Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 138

Commodities prices and the Australian stock market

This article describes how commodities prices affect Australian stock market returns. My focus is not on how the price of one commodity like iron ore affects a particular stock such as Rio or Fortescue, but how commodities prices in general have affected overall returns from the broad stock market over many decades.

Everything we eat, wear, read, sit on, drive, ride, communicate with, and use in our lives every day is made by companies using commodities – crops, livestock, energy, minerals, metals, timber, etc. Commodities prices have cyclical impacts on corporate revenues, earnings and share prices.

The commodities price factor described here is one of several factors used in my fundamental multi-factor, multi-time frame process that is used to make asset allocation decisions.

Focus on changes in the rate of change

What happens to commodities prices is related to subsequent returns from the overall stock market. It is not the level of commodity prices (ie high or low) or changes in prices (direction) that are important, but changes in the rate of change in commodities prices (ie changes in direction) that are related to subsequent equity returns.

My analytical process requires the relationship to have worked for at least 50 years over many different types of market conditions, so I use the Reuters-Jeffreys CRB index. It measures prices of a broad basket of commodities and the composition of the basket changes to reflect changes in global commodity usage and importance.

AO Picture1 111215

AO Picture1 111215

The above chart shows the commodities price index and the Australian stock market index since WW2.

The more recent swings in commodities prices are the late 1970s oil spike and gold/silver bubble, the 2000s China-led mining boom and bust, the GFC price collapse and rebound, and the current price slump caused by the China slowdown and global over-supply in virtually all commodities. These big commodities boom-bust cycles are when the commodities factor in my analysis generates the strongest signals for subsequent stock market returns.

The commodities price factor works best when used in the short term (within 1 year) outlook models for the broad stock market.

How my modelling works

In my model, it doesn’t matter whether commodities prices are high or low, nor whether they are rising or falling. What matters is changes in the rate of change of commodities prices. For example, if prices having been rising (or falling) steadily for a while, investors get used to this and price their expectations of ‘more of the same’ into share prices. But when the rises (or falls) suddenly accelerate or decelerate this changes investor expectations and accelerates the buying or selling of shares.

Slowing rates of commodity price growth (or decelerating rises) are usually followed by relatively low equity returns:

  • Investors price in lower export prices and revenues
  • Foreign investors lose their interest in Australian shares (not just mining related stocks)

Rising rates of commodity price growth (or decelerating falls) are usually followed by relatively high equity returns:

  • Investors price in higher export price and revenue growth
  • Foreign investors are more attracted to Australian stocks.

Forecast excess returns using this factor

The following chart shows quarterly forecast excess returns (above prevailing cash rate) from this factor since 1960.

AO Picture2 111215This factor has worked well by providing warning signals before the biggest stock market downturns and upturns. The biggest negative signals (lowest red bars) were immediately before the 1973-1974 stock market crash and before the 2008-2009 sub-prime crash.

It has also worked well through most of the other less severe upswings and downturns, even in cycles that did not involve mining booms or busts.

Like the other factors used in the models, the commodities price factor will often generate small positive or negative signals (short blue or red bars in the chart), for example, the small signals during the middle stages of the 2003-2007 boom. These small signals provide no information to the process and in these cases at least one of the other factors in the model are usually providing more meaningful signals as they measure different aspects of the overall market environment. What I am looking for is big positive or negative signals and these big signals have provided reliable outlooks for subsequent returns from the broad stock market.

The next chart is the same as the last (forecast return above the prevailing cash rate) but in more detail since 2000.

AO Picture3 111215This factor was bullish during the middle and late stages of the 2000s boom then turned bearish at the end of 2007, at the start of the downturn. It then turned extremely bullish right at the bottom of the GFC before the big 2009 rebound. It was bearish before the 2010 Greece crisis and again before the 2011 Greece 2 crisis.

Current position

The short term outlook from this factor is currently bullish.

It's more common to believe that because commodities prices have been relatively low and falling further recently, this would be bearish for shares prices. But not necessarily so. What is important is the changes in the rate of change in commodities prices, not the level or direction.

The factor lost its bullishness in late 2014 but only mildly and briefly, indicating two things. First, it was not bullish for shares in 2015. Second, the stock market pause or decline in 2015 would probably not be sustained or serious (unlike the big and sustained bearish signals before and during the tech wreck, the GFC, Greece 1 and Greece 2). The factor has been bullish from mid-late 2015.


The commodities price factor described here is only one of the several factors used in our short term outlook for Australian shares. Often the different factors provide conflicting signals because they are measuring different aspects of the overall capital markets environment.

In addition to the several factors in the short term models, I also use several 3 year medium term cyclical factors and also factors in the long term 7-10+ year fundamental pricing models in arriving at the overall outlook. As Australian shares is just one asset class in multi-sector portfolios, I also use a range of processes to determine outlooks for the other asset classes. All these factors are taken into account when making asset allocation settings in portfolios.

For those requiring more detail, a brief outline of the process is attached here.

During 2016, I will write a series of articles further describing the factors I consider in my models and asset allocation techniques.


Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund. This article is for general education only and is not personal financial advice. It does not consider the financial circumstances of any individual.


Leave a Comment:



BHP v Rio v Fortescue: it's all about the iron ore price

Commodity prices rescue 2019 Budget

2015 asset class review and 2016 outlook


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.