Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 162

Department stores going out of vogue

Department stores worldwide are facing challenging times. In the past few years we have seen many department stores marking down prices to move excess inventory, including Nordstrom and Macy’s, the darlings among the global department stores. Others like JC Penney and our homegrown Myer and David Jones are still in the process of turning their businesses around.

Even today, with economic conditions in the US and Europe improving (but now under the Brexit shadow), department stores, which straddle the line between luxury, value and convenience, continue to lose market share. Department stores currently account for only 11% of the total US apparel market, down from 26% in 2005. This slump has given rise to questions and fears about the overall health and relevancy of the department store model in today’s retail and economic environment.

Australian department store headwinds

Myer and David Jones have had some tough years with both companies taking drastic measures to turn their businesses around and make them more relevant to today’s consumers. Target and Big W continue to struggle with Wesfarmers announcing major write-downs and restructuring costs in relation to Target, and Woolworths undertaking a comprehensive review of Big W.

Only Kmart has been successful in growing market share. It is a well-managed business and has stayed relevant at a time when consumers were cutting back spending. This phenomenon is similar to dollar stores and Walmart in the US performing well during the GFC and is common during times of economic hardships.

Also affecting the department store sector is the growth of specialty retailers both local and international and the advent of online shopping. A slew of international specialty retailers has set up here and this shows no signs of abating. Then there is online shopping – the elephant in the room. When the Aussie dollar was more or less on par with the US dollar, Australians discovered the joys of shopping online. While the depreciating Aussie dollar has made this less desirable, the ease of shopping coupled with the ability to compare prices means harried Australian consumers continue to shop online.

Shopper habits change during economic hardships

During the GFC, shoppers didn’t stop shopping but they did look for cheaper and newer options. They stepped out of their comfort zone and tried new formats and new stores. Those who used to shop at Macy’s ventured into Walmart and dollar stores. Those who shopped at Myer and David Jones tried out Kmart, Target and Big W. This changed shoppers’ perception of value and some continue to frequent these discount chains even as economic conditions improve.

Ibis World reports that the department stores sector in Australia declined by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 0.1% over the past five years while the discounted department stores sector grew at an annual rate of 2.1%.

Figure 1: Australian department stores losing market share (except Kmart)

 

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 9.41.16 pm

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 9.41.16 pm

The department store model is losing relevancy

The root cause of the problem goes deeper than shoppers looking for cheaper options. Department stores are unable to remain relevant and viable in an environment characterised by changing consumer behaviour. As Kevin Graff, retail consultant, says, “Department stores are being ‘out-retailed’ by specialty retailers.” Department stores were formed on the premise of convenience, but this exact business model is now working against them.

Younger consumers with little time to spare find department stores inconvenient and time consuming. They are difficult to get to (most are situated in malls which means you have to park elsewhere and walk to the store), they are difficult to navigate (consumers have to walk past myriad sections that they have no interest in to buy just that one product they’re looking for) and they do not have enough staff or pay counters (consumes even more time as clients have to go in search of these). And to top it all off they are usually more expensive.

On the other hand, specialty retailers who also straddle the luxury­–discount border and thus compete directly with department stores may offer a smaller range of products but boast a better selection in their chosen product range (i.e. women’s clothing, swimwear, active wear or toys), more competitive prices, higher quality merchandising, better in-store and service experience as well as a comprehensive online presence.

Department stores’ autumn and winter styles usually consist of the traditional dark and dreary clothing. However, hipper specialty retailers like Uniqlo have bucked this trend and are selling bright colours all year round. International specialty retailers like H&M, Zara and Uniqlo have been successful in growing their presence in Australia. While they only accounted for around 1.1% of total sales across clothing, accessories and department stores in Australia in 2015, Macquarie Research expects them to continue to grow their footprint within the country, accounting for around 1.7­–2% of sales in 2016.

Figure 2: International specialty retailers increasing presence in Australia

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 9.41.48 pm

Online shopping is the elephant in the room

Shoppers can go online while travelling home on the train and order a pair of shoes from the US or China at a fraction of the cost, time and effort it would take to shop at a department store. This trend continues to play havoc on retailers. Amazon is now referred to as middle class America’s new department store, and Morgan Stanley reports that “internet retailers (led by Amazon) have added US$27.8 billion to their apparel revenue since 2005, while department stores have lost US$29.6 billion”. It expects department stores to only account for 7% of the total apparel market in the US by 2020, down from 26% in 2005.

 Figure 3: US department stores in a losing battle with internet retailers

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 9.54.51 pm

The story is no different in Australia. NAB’s latest online retail index reports that Australian online retail sales surged 10.8% in the year to April 2016 reaching a phenomenal A$19.6 billion, growing 3x faster than traditional brick and mortar retail sales.

 Figure 4: Australian online retail sales growing 3x faster than traditional retail sales

Screen Shot 2016-06-29 at 10.09.18 pm

Australia’s biggest retailers entered the online game late and are still playing catch up to international retailers. Citigroup reports, that on average, online sales at Australia’s largest 10 retailers, represent only around 6% of total sales - well below global online sales penetration of 11%. Australian consumers are bypassing these giants altogether and opting to shop at international e-commerce sites such as Amazon, eBay, asos.com and boohoo.com.

We prefer specialty retailers and remain cautious on department stores

While the department store model may be outdated, not all is over for retail. Experts believe that adopting an omni-channel strategy will allow these department stores to stay relevant even in today’s environment. However, they have to act quickly and decisively. Those who take measures to complement their retail presence with a well laid out online strategy, superior customer service and who provide an experience rather than a service stand to gain in this day and age.

Our preference in the retailing sector is specialty retailers like Baby Bunting (baby goods), Adairs (high end linen and homeware), JB Hi-Fi and Harvey Norman (electronics) and Premier Investments (Smiggle – children’s stationery). These companies have built a sustainable competitive advantage within their chosen products, boast good growth prospects and continue to exert their dominance by expanding locally and internationally.

 

 

John O’Connell is Chief Investment Officer at Macquarie BFS and Founder of Owners Advisory by Macquarie. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.