Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 265

Why dividend yields in Australia are so high

People often ask me why listed company dividend yields in Australia are so high. The average dividend yield across the Australian stock market is currently 4.1% or twice the world average. It is the highest in the world apart from Russia, Portugal, Turkey, UAE, Qatar and Nigeria.

There is a good reason for this. In the early stages of a country’s development, dividend yields start at high levels because investors are nervous about getting their money back if they have to wait too long. In the 1880s, dividend yields in Australia and the US both ran at 6% to 8%. As a country matures, investors develop trust in the corporate sector’s ability to invest wisely for future growth and so they let boards retain more of their profits to invest, and pay less back as dividends. In this sense, Australia is still like an early stage emerging market.

A history of reckless spending

Investors have a well-deserved distrust of Australian directors' and CEOs' ability to invest excess cash wisely, and so they demand profits be returned as dividends instead. Australian companies have a long history of wasting money on ego-boosting projects, usually in the form of reckless overpriced overseas ventures undertaken in booms. Then they are forced to sell, close or give the assets away after wasting billions of dollars. This trait has infected our big banks, miners, telcos, retailers, and hundreds of other companies. Success stories like Westfield, Macquarie, CSL, Seek, Cochlear, Sonic and Computershare are rare exceptions in a sea of red ink from failed expansions.

Australia is a small country in the middle of nowhere, and our directors find it hard to resist the temptation to chase the dream of free travel and adventure in pursuit of fame and fortune, all with shareholder money! Grand plans are usually hatched at the tops of booms, often with debt, with assumptions that prices will keep rising forever. They never do of course.

At the top of the 2011 mining boom when oil prices were above $100 per barrel, BHP spent $20 billion buying two shale oil operations in south eastern USA – Fayetteville for $4.8 billion and Petrohawk for $15 billion. BHP’s CEO was South African former management consultant Marius Kloppers, and Chairman was former Ford CEO Jac Nasser. Nasser had spent his career at Ford begging Canberra for handouts for Ford Australia, and begging Washington for handouts for Ford US. Neither knew much about mining or running profitable businesses without taxpayer support. BHP then spent the next six years throwing even more money at the troublesome projects while progressively writing off billions.

Click to enlarge

In theory, shareholders appoint the custodians of their companies

Finally last week, BHP announced the sale of both projects - Fayetteville for just $300 million and Petrohawk for $10.8 billion. At the same time, it wrote off another $3 billion, bringing losses to around $20 billion. That’s US dollars, not Australian dollars!

In the meantime, CEO Kloppers was fired and replaced by Scotsman Andrew Mackenzie, a real miner, and Chairman Nasser was replaced by former Amcor CEO Ken MacKenzie, with real experience running a very profitable business.

It is good to see BHP back in good, or at least better, hands once again. But we still don’t trust them. Thankfully, they are handing back all of the cash proceeds of the Petrohawk and Fayetteville sales to shareholders. They are also paying out record dividends from the windfall recovery in commodities prices over the past two years. The BHP share price is drifting up again, mainly because prices of commodities are rising, not because of good management.

The scary thing is that it could have been much worse. Kloppers and Nasser tried to use BHP to take over rival miner Rio Tinto for $150 billion in early 2008 when the iron ore price was at its all-time peak of $200 per tonne. It is now just $65 per tonne, and Rio was rescued by the Chinese government.

The problem is we can’t blame the CEOs, directors and chairpersons for bad decisions even if they had no relevant experience when there were appointed. In theory, they are put there by shareholders, so that’s where the blame lies. In reality, it is a cozy club because the big shareholders – which is mainly the big institutional super funds – stand by idly and let it happen. For small shareholders, it is easier to just watch from a safe distance and get out when we see trouble brewing.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

5 Comments
Gen Y
August 03, 2018

You can hardly create the link between Australia having a 'developing sharemarket' and high dividends... You could argue our share market is one of the most developed in the world given we all have significant exposure to it through our Superannuation.

It is Tax, Tax, Tax and Tax. Most companies offer generous dividend reinvest terms, why? Because it is in many investor's best interest to wash the money through as a dividend with the fat refundable tax credit, then it is for the company to simply reinvest those profits. Many companies also complete Capital Raisings whilst also paying out a high proportion of profits as dividends, again for the same reasons.

Trying to create a link between anything else is just incorrect.

David Heath
August 02, 2018

Good article Ashley. Your criticisms of individual companies applies to the whole of Australia and governance. The ASX has gone up around 4 times over 30 odd years compared to 12 times for the Dow and around 60! times for the Nasdaq. Australian property is up around say 8 times over the same period. This is extremely strange as the risk premium for property is lower than for stock market investments. In addition if we take the last 10 years the ASX is up around 20% (Dow 110%) compared to inflation of around 30% so individuals who sell the overall market now pay CGT on real losses! The relative difference in the treatment of CGT between property and the ASX is one of the reasons why the ASX has underperformed compared to property. If Labor increases the CGT to around 36% at the highest marginal rate this would be close to the highest in the world - and still not indexed for inflation - which is the reason for the current 50% discount - I think I will move to NZ or Switzerland if I can get in! In Australia we seem happy to pay an extra $100b per year in financing costs (Australian banks are still five times bigger than in the US in terms of relative market cap - for doing the same work!) in oder to save a default of say $20b that might happen once every 10 years!

hank
August 02, 2018

I would have thought that tax policy in conjunction with a massive pool of superannuation money and high levels of retail share ownership may have a significant impact ??
(think imputation, significant SMSF sector, deductibility of interest & tax credits)

Peter Thornhill
August 02, 2018

I can think of no better endorsement of dividends versus retained profits. The episodes of misuse of shareholders money by megalomaniac CEO's are legendary.

Hank
August 02, 2018

I would have thought the tax system in conjunction with a massive superannuation pool plays a major role in the high level of payouts in both absolute & relative terms

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Banks, BHP, RIO, CSL and the tyranny of size

ASX stocks that have stood the test of time

Longest positive run for Australian shares since WWII

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Where Baby Boomer wealth will end up

By 2028, all Baby Boomers will be eligible for retirement and the Baby Boomer bubble will have all but deflated. Where will this generation's money end up, and what are the implications for the wealth management industry?

Are term deposits attractive right now?

If you’re like me, you may have put money into term deposits over the past year and it’s time to decide whether to roll them over or look elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of cash versus other assets right now.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

How retiree spending plummets as we age

There's been little debate on how spending changes as people progress through retirement. Yet, it's a critical issue as it can have a significant impact on the level of savings required at the point of retirement.

Meg on SMSFs: $3 million super tax coming whether we’re ready or not

A Senate Committee reported back last week with a majority recommendation to pass the $3 million super tax unaltered. It seems that the tax is coming, and this is what those affected should be doing now to prepare for it.

How much do you need to retire comfortably?

Two commonly asked questions are: 'How much do I need to retire' and 'How much can I afford to spend in retirement'? This is a guide to help you come up with your own numbers to suit your goals and needs.

Latest Updates

Economy

Is 'The Great Australian Dream' a sham?

Peter Dutton has made housing a key issue for the next election, pledging to “restore the Australian dream” of home ownership. It got me thinking about what this dream represents, how it originated, and whether it’s still relevant today.

Superannuation

Clime time: Taxing unrealised capital gains – is there a better idea?

The efficacy and fairness of establishing an unrealised gains tax regime will hopefully be hotly debated at the next election. We need better ideas on how to use the strategic and unique benefits of our massive super funds.

Retirement

How long will you live?

We are often quoted life expectancy at birth but what matters most is how long we should live as we grow older. It is surprising how short this can be for people born last century, so make the most of it.

Investment strategies

What poker can teach us about investing

So-called ‘resulting’ is what poker players call the tendency to judge a decision based on its outcome rather than its quality. It's something that happens a lot in investing, though should be avoided at all costs.

Latest from Morningstar

Should you buy and hold an Artificial Intelligence portfolio?

For those with the patience to own an investment as volatile as the AI sector, buying and holding a stock basket might make sense. However, based on internet stocks’ history, you need not rush to do so.

Strategy

The bull market in commodities may be just starting

The world is entering a higher cost environment which will hit the profits of companies in many sectors. A key beneficiary will be commodities, where supply shortages are meeting increasing demand from AI and green energy.

Shares

The challenges facing electric vehicles

Slowing demand and profit warnings from the EV manufacturers has seen analysts revise down their EV penetration forecasts. What's behind the slowdown, and are the issues a blip or something more serious?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.