Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 162

Don’t let Brexit rush you to the exit

As I write this column, the UK has voted to leave the European Union. According to relatives of members of my team living in London, Britons on the Tube are telling Eastern Europeans, “Time to pack your bags”.  The Dow is down over 5%, Spain is down 12% and some individual shares have fallen by more than 20% (Editor's note: at the time of publication, many markets have recovered some of the initial losses, which thus far serves to reinforce the comments made in this article).

Jumping at shadows is the stock market’s specialty and for an industry that is paid a percentage of activity, it relishes such events. But the Greek philosophers had it right when they said: “This too will pass.”

And pass it does

In the 66 years since 1950, there have been 57 market moves downward of 20% or more in either of the US S&P 500, the UK's FTSE, Germany's DAX, and Japan's Nikkei. Think about that statistic - it means a ‘crash’ in a major market every 1.15 years. I would describe that as frequent and regular. As markets become more interconnected and investors more aware, anything form slowing Chinese growth to a rising oil price can trigger panic.

When asked about whether he was worried about a big drop in the market, Warren Buffet’s colleague Charlie Munger replied:

“In fact you can argue that if you’re not willing to react with equanimity to a market price decline of 50% two or three times a century you’re not fit to be a common shareholder and you deserve the mediocre result you’re going to get compared to the people who do have the temperament, who can be more philosophical about these market fluctuations.”

Munger’s comments beg the question, why would an investor be willing to invest in any market that could halve? The answer is that the stock market is the greatest concentration of financially irrational people in any one place.

Here’s an allegory used by Buffett that I like: think about a farmer in Orange, Dubbo or Parkes who has inherited a farm from a generous ancestor, and on which there is no debt. The farmer is under no pressure to sell the farm. Clearly there will be a few bad years, but there will also be a few good years. Buffett suggests you think of the stock market and its distracting and noisy volatility as the emotionally immature farm neighbour who:

“[yells] out a price every day to me at which he would either buy my farm or sell me his — and those prices varied widely over short periods of time depending on his mental state … If his daily shout-out was ridiculously low, and I had some spare cash, I would buy his farm. If the number he yelled was absurdly high, I could either sell to him or just go on farming.”

Despite their apparent significance, events like Brexit represent little more than the noisy neighbour panicking that his farm might fall further in price. The constant stream of discussion, prediction and introspection about interest rates, unemployment, inflation and the economy is nothing more than a distraction from the main game of investing.

Try to avoid the distractions

Now, it is true that prices may indeed fall but should we care? Is the value of a portfolio of pieces of extraordinary businesses determined by daily gyrating prices? We know that a company increases in value by adding retained earnings to its equity capital and maintaining its return on the now larger equity.

If I can find a business that is able to grow its equity tenfold while maintaining its return on the growing equity, I know that I will be able to sell it for far more in the future than I paid for it today. I don’t need to worry about China, the US Federal Reserve or Brexit.

Stock market investors forget the valuation mechanics of compounding returns and allow the emotional behaviour of their fellow investors to infect their decision-making, causing them to respond emotionally too. If you didn’t rush to sell your home, your hobby farm, your holiday house or your caravan during the tech wreck or the GFC, then there is no reason you should behave differently when it comes to your share portfolio. The only difference is that one is priced daily and the other assets are not.

Price is what you pay, value is what you receive. If that is true, then the value of the portfolio changes much more slowly than prices. Don’t let the daily liquidity of shares combined with the noise of Brexit and other macro events dissuade you from taking advantage of bargains or influence you to sell extraordinary companies when their shares are temporarily depressed.

 

Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able’. This article is for general educational purposes and does not consider the specific circumstances of any individual.

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reason to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies will benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated investors' can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.