Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 21

The financial life cycle paradox

Changing lifestyles combined with increasing life expectancy have outgrown traditional retirement planning models. But living longer does not translate into financial freedom. The natural conclusion is that you can work longer and therefore have more savings for your retirement. But the paradox is that people have less income-earning years and more education years and a better education does not necessarily lead to an improved financial position.

Increased life expectancy

Over the last 50 years, life expectancy has increased by around 12 years. A child born today will live until they are in their early 90s, and possibly much longer. The reasons Australians are living longer include better diet, improved medicines and living conditions.

In addition to everyone living longer, people are delaying significant life events. Australians are getting married and starting families later and having fewer children. Higher property costs means that children are staying at home longer and this is reflected in the increasing age of first home buyers. Many of these decisions regarding lifestyle are made because of someone’s financial position.

Economic structural changes

There have also been structural changes to the Australian economy that are impacting on an individual’s ability to save and invest for their future. Notably, Australia has increasingly become a high cost of production economy and to compete internationally we must improve our skills and qualifications. Australians are therefore spending more time at school and in tertiary and vocational training at a financial cost to themselves. Even with Government assistance to fund tertiary education many young adults are starting their working years indebted.

Another major structural change occurring is the increasing trend to casual or part time work.  Until the early 1990s it was common to have a job with one organisation for life. Today, this is rare and it is expected that people will change not only jobs four or five times in their career, but also the industry. This trend to part time or casual work, particularly amongst older workers, means their pre-retirement incomes are lower, limiting their ability to save.

Wealthmaker Financial Services has analysed these trends and structural changes, producing some telling ratios that have implications not only for financial institutions, but every Australian.

Sources: CIA World Fact Book, World Bank, ABS School Statistics Census, Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Averaging has been applied to cover the differences, e.g. males versus females.

The table shows that a person born in 1960 was expected to live to 71, today that person’s life expectancy has been revised to 82. The table then shows how those years will be spent. The table contains three important points for all of us:

1. Income earning/life expectancy

In 1960 the average Australian spent 61.7% of their life working, whereas today it’s only 42.7%.  This means that Australians have less time in the workforce, and therefore a reduced timeframe to save and invest for their retirement.

2. Retirement/life expectancy

In 1960 the average Australian was expected to live for 8 years after they retired. Today it’s around 22 years. For many in their pre-retirement years, they are unable to accumulate any more wealth because they are working part-time, even though they may wish to work full time. This means that their income is being used for living expenses.

3. Income Earning/retirement

In 1960, an Australian had 5.5 income-earning years to save or invest for each retirement year. Today the ratio is 1.6 earning years. An individual must save enough during their income-earning years to pay for 22 years of expected retirement.

Another factor frequently overlooked is the increasing tertiary education costs. Even with HECS and VET fee assistance, most children today when they start their working lives are indebted and often have to pay off this debt before they take out a mortgage. This is unlike the baby boomers, many of whom received free tertiary education, so they started their working lives debt free.

As our income-earning years are decreasing and our retirement years are increasing the current level of superannuation savings is insufficient. The Federal Government is taking some action to address this by increasing the superannuation levy, however, this only goes part of the way.  Australians will have to work longer and may have to accept a lower standard of living both before and in retirement.

 

Michael McAlary is Founder and Managing Director of WealthMaker Financial Services.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Putting off that retirement speech

So, we are not spending our super balances. So what!

Why life expectancy numbers are widely misunderstood

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.