Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 135

Great businesses where customers do the work

What business would you like to own? For some, the dream might be McDonalds, Subway or even the local Laundromat, all potentially good businesses. But some new companies have more compelling operating models. Uber owns no cars, Facebook doesn’t pay for its media content and Alibaba, the world’s largest e-commerce site, has no stock to store. They’re all great businesses because they require little inventory and have low capital costs. They also become better businesses as they get bigger because of the network effect (see Facebook below). Some businesses like Tripadvisor have customers that do their work for them. That’s a fantastic business model - customers make the business better for free.

You are the content

Facebook doesn’t buy TV shows. It’s a reality show that is you. Your posts are the content. Unlike other media businesses, Facebook doesn’t pay money to produce shows or write off shows you don’t like. It makes money from your content by placing advertising within your newsfeed. On average, 1 in 20 posts have an advert. In the past 12 months, their global average revenue per user was $10.47. Australia is not broken out but the average US user brings in $34.

All those likes you click add up. Facebook needs 70 likes to understand your personality better than your friends. With 250 Facebook likes, a computer can know you better than your spouse. Facebook has a Superbowl-like audience every day where advertisers can target specific customers with a compelling alternative to television advertising. Facebook doesn’t need to market to sign up new users. Current users help Facebook grow for free as they send out links to sign up friends. The network effects are strong with one billion daily active users. A past example of the network effect is the telephone. The more people who own telephones the more valuable the telephone is to each user. Facebook is the same.

The average gross margin (sales minus costs of goods sold) for S&P500 companies is 33%. A large gross margin means greater potential profitability. Facebook’s unique business model delivers its 83% margin. The majority of expenses are employees researching and developing new services such as Instagram, instant messaging with WhatsApp and virtual reality with Occulus Rift. According to Nielsen, the average Australian spends 1.7 hours a day on Facebook. It’s easy to admire a new age media company that doesn’t pay for the content that drives the business.

Customers working for you

Tripadvisor is a similar user-generated model. It is the world’s largest travel site allowing travellers to plan and book their perfect trip. Tripadvisor doesn’t employ staff to write hotel reviews, their customers do it for them. Every day, the CEO wakes up and customers have added thousands of more reviews every night. I personally like the sound of this business.

Tripadvisor has 250 million reviews on 5.2 million places to stay, eat and things to do. You couldn’t hire enough staff to build it. Frequent reviewers receive virtual badges and you can guess how much that costs. Users are even willing to write reviews on small mobile screens. Like Facebook, it has a virtuous circle where more reviews lead to more traffic which leads to more reviews. Tripadvisor employs only 3,000 staff compared with 18,000 staff at Expedia and 12,700 at Priceline. Gross margins are even larger than Facebook’s at 96% (that’s not a typo). The majority of expenses are sales and marketing, such as television advertising. As the diagram below shows, customers (free employees) add 160 contributions a minute.

Source: Tripadvisor 2Q Investor Presentation

Source: Tripadvisor 2Q Investor Presentation

Source: Tripadvisor 2Q Investor Presentation

Can the business scale?

Apart from user-generated content, other good businesses involve companies that can grow and scale with little additional staff. As an ex-accountant and fund manager, I appreciate the benefits of scalability. Good people are hard to find. As accounting or law firms grow, they need to add more staff as they win new business. However, as a fund manager grows they don’t have to increase staff numbers commensurately. Look at the success of Magellan and Platinum. Magellan manages $39 billion with only 90 staff.

Another great business model is one that involves large-scale exchange traded funds (ETFs). There is none of the key man risk associated with star portfolio managers, and it’s hard to underperform a benchmark when you create it. In most sectors, ETFs are highly scalable with few of the limits to capacity evident for specialist managers such as hedge funds or small caps. In fact, as an ETF attracts more money it becomes more valuable to customers as liquidity and trading increases. For example, the US ETF provider, WisdomTree (represented in Australia by BetaShares), employs 124 people to manage $60 billion.

High gross margins and scalability

There are many great businesses out there but technology tends to top the list. The reason why the NASDAQ is one of the best performing indexes is because their companies tend to have high gross margins and scalable business models. Anyone in an operating business would love to have these characteristics. It’s hard finding good staff and attracting customers. Let your customers do the work and scale your business!

 

Jason Sedawie is a Portfolio Manager at Decisive Asset Management, a global growth-focused fund. Disclosure: Decisive holds Facebook in its fund. This article is for general purposes only and does not consider the specific needs of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Network effects: when big gets very big very quickly

Facebook, Google need new business model

Why the tech giants still impress

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.