Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 258

Why the tech giants still impress

Despite concerns regarding high valuations and potential regulatory backlash, the latest earnings reporting season highlighted the strong and well diversified sources of earnings the tech giants are still able to harness. This article delves into the actual earnings performance of some of the leading names in the NASDAQ-100 Index.

US earnings continue to shine

Before focusing on tech stocks in particular, it’s worth noting that the current US earnings reporting season has been strong by historic standards.

According to US research firm FactSet, most of the companies in the S&P500 beat market expectations in first quarter earnings in 2018. Annual growth in quarterly earnings is now estimated at around 24%, up from the bullish expectation of 18% before the reporting season began.

What’s more, while US tax cuts have been an important recent driver of improved earnings performance, other factors such as the economy’s strength, rising oil prices and a weaker US$ have also played key roles. Indeed, revenue performance has been even more impressive, with 77% of companies beating revenue estimates, compared to a 5-year beat ratio of only 57%.

Rising commodity prices have delivered particularly strong growth in energy and material sector earnings, while the technology and financial sectors have benefited from strong advertising markets and higher interest rates respectively.

Source: FactSet

Tech giants still doing well

Given the relatively strong performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index in recent years, particular interest of late has focused on the tech giants such as Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (Google), and Facebook. And contrary to concerns that they may be running out of growth options, their latest earnings reports were impressive.

Indeed, although many of the tech giants rose to prominence through a single flagship product or service, they are still able to generate good returns from their traditional 'cash cows', due to strong network effects and scale economies.

At the same time, most of the tech giants have also successfully expanded into new areas, such as cloud computing, music, and video streaming services.

Despite recent controversies over the use of private data at Google and Facebook, both their users and advertisers have so far remained loyal. And Apple’s performance has been so good that famed US investor, Warren Buffett, announced recently that he had increased his stake and expressed regret that he could not own the whole company.

More detail on the earnings results, and underlying drivers, for the top five companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index are provided below:

Source: Thomson Reuters

Of course, new regulations, particularly most recently in Europe, could make it easier for users to delete their private data or opt out of the data collection arrangements by companies such as Alphabet and Facebook, and hence lessen their ability to offer 'micro-targeted' advertisements. The extent to which users eventually avail themselves of these opportunities to better protect their private data remains to be seen.

Nevertheless, it is likely that today’s leading companies will retain a dominant position in whatever form of targeted digital ad services remains in the new regulatory era. Companies such as Facebook could also move toward seeking subscription fees for the digital platforms and services that it offers.

NASDAQ-100 valuations still not demanding

More broadly, given the ongoing strong earnings performance of companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index, valuations have become even more reasonable of late.

As at end-April 2018, the price-to-forward earnings ratio for the NASDAQ-100 Index had dropped to 18.8 from a recent end-month peak of 21 at end-January. That’s still below the long-run average PE ratio of 24 (which also excludes the bubble years from 1998 to 2000). Based on current Bloomberg earnings expectations, forward earnings are expected to rise a further 8% by end-December 2018, and a further 13% over 2019.

Despite the Australian equity market’s low technology weighting, Australian investors can easily gain exposure to the tech giants on America’s NASDAQ-100 Index – and diversify their portfolios – via the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX code: NDQ). NDQ aims to track the NASDAQ-100 Index before fees and expenses and can be bought and sold like any share on the ASX.

 

David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, which offers exchange traded products listed on the ASX. This article contains general information only and does not consider the investment circumstances of any individual. Nasdaq®, OMX®, Nasdaq-100®, and Nasdaq-100 Index®, are registered trademarks of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and are licensed for use by BetaShares.

BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

 

  •   14 June 2018
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why the four tech giants are not expensive

Is your portfolio too heavy on technology stocks?

Howard Marks warns of market froth

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.