Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 258

Why the tech giants still impress

Despite concerns regarding high valuations and potential regulatory backlash, the latest earnings reporting season highlighted the strong and well diversified sources of earnings the tech giants are still able to harness. This article delves into the actual earnings performance of some of the leading names in the NASDAQ-100 Index.

US earnings continue to shine

Before focusing on tech stocks in particular, it’s worth noting that the current US earnings reporting season has been strong by historic standards.

According to US research firm FactSet, most of the companies in the S&P500 beat market expectations in first quarter earnings in 2018. Annual growth in quarterly earnings is now estimated at around 24%, up from the bullish expectation of 18% before the reporting season began.

What’s more, while US tax cuts have been an important recent driver of improved earnings performance, other factors such as the economy’s strength, rising oil prices and a weaker US$ have also played key roles. Indeed, revenue performance has been even more impressive, with 77% of companies beating revenue estimates, compared to a 5-year beat ratio of only 57%.

Rising commodity prices have delivered particularly strong growth in energy and material sector earnings, while the technology and financial sectors have benefited from strong advertising markets and higher interest rates respectively.

Source: FactSet

Tech giants still doing well

Given the relatively strong performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index in recent years, particular interest of late has focused on the tech giants such as Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (Google), and Facebook. And contrary to concerns that they may be running out of growth options, their latest earnings reports were impressive.

Indeed, although many of the tech giants rose to prominence through a single flagship product or service, they are still able to generate good returns from their traditional 'cash cows', due to strong network effects and scale economies.

At the same time, most of the tech giants have also successfully expanded into new areas, such as cloud computing, music, and video streaming services.

Despite recent controversies over the use of private data at Google and Facebook, both their users and advertisers have so far remained loyal. And Apple’s performance has been so good that famed US investor, Warren Buffett, announced recently that he had increased his stake and expressed regret that he could not own the whole company.

More detail on the earnings results, and underlying drivers, for the top five companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index are provided below:

Source: Thomson Reuters

Of course, new regulations, particularly most recently in Europe, could make it easier for users to delete their private data or opt out of the data collection arrangements by companies such as Alphabet and Facebook, and hence lessen their ability to offer 'micro-targeted' advertisements. The extent to which users eventually avail themselves of these opportunities to better protect their private data remains to be seen.

Nevertheless, it is likely that today’s leading companies will retain a dominant position in whatever form of targeted digital ad services remains in the new regulatory era. Companies such as Facebook could also move toward seeking subscription fees for the digital platforms and services that it offers.

NASDAQ-100 valuations still not demanding

More broadly, given the ongoing strong earnings performance of companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index, valuations have become even more reasonable of late.

As at end-April 2018, the price-to-forward earnings ratio for the NASDAQ-100 Index had dropped to 18.8 from a recent end-month peak of 21 at end-January. That’s still below the long-run average PE ratio of 24 (which also excludes the bubble years from 1998 to 2000). Based on current Bloomberg earnings expectations, forward earnings are expected to rise a further 8% by end-December 2018, and a further 13% over 2019.

Despite the Australian equity market’s low technology weighting, Australian investors can easily gain exposure to the tech giants on America’s NASDAQ-100 Index – and diversify their portfolios – via the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX code: NDQ). NDQ aims to track the NASDAQ-100 Index before fees and expenses and can be bought and sold like any share on the ASX.

 

David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, which offers exchange traded products listed on the ASX. This article contains general information only and does not consider the investment circumstances of any individual. Nasdaq®, OMX®, Nasdaq-100®, and Nasdaq-100 Index®, are registered trademarks of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and are licensed for use by BetaShares.

BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

 

  •   14 June 2018
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why the four tech giants are not expensive

Is your portfolio too heavy on technology stocks?

Howard Marks warns of market froth

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.