Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 258

Why the tech giants still impress

Despite concerns regarding high valuations and potential regulatory backlash, the latest earnings reporting season highlighted the strong and well diversified sources of earnings the tech giants are still able to harness. This article delves into the actual earnings performance of some of the leading names in the NASDAQ-100 Index.

US earnings continue to shine

Before focusing on tech stocks in particular, it’s worth noting that the current US earnings reporting season has been strong by historic standards.

According to US research firm FactSet, most of the companies in the S&P500 beat market expectations in first quarter earnings in 2018. Annual growth in quarterly earnings is now estimated at around 24%, up from the bullish expectation of 18% before the reporting season began.

What’s more, while US tax cuts have been an important recent driver of improved earnings performance, other factors such as the economy’s strength, rising oil prices and a weaker US$ have also played key roles. Indeed, revenue performance has been even more impressive, with 77% of companies beating revenue estimates, compared to a 5-year beat ratio of only 57%.

Rising commodity prices have delivered particularly strong growth in energy and material sector earnings, while the technology and financial sectors have benefited from strong advertising markets and higher interest rates respectively.

Source: FactSet

Tech giants still doing well

Given the relatively strong performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index in recent years, particular interest of late has focused on the tech giants such as Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (Google), and Facebook. And contrary to concerns that they may be running out of growth options, their latest earnings reports were impressive.

Indeed, although many of the tech giants rose to prominence through a single flagship product or service, they are still able to generate good returns from their traditional 'cash cows', due to strong network effects and scale economies.

At the same time, most of the tech giants have also successfully expanded into new areas, such as cloud computing, music, and video streaming services.

Despite recent controversies over the use of private data at Google and Facebook, both their users and advertisers have so far remained loyal. And Apple’s performance has been so good that famed US investor, Warren Buffett, announced recently that he had increased his stake and expressed regret that he could not own the whole company.

More detail on the earnings results, and underlying drivers, for the top five companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index are provided below:

Source: Thomson Reuters

Of course, new regulations, particularly most recently in Europe, could make it easier for users to delete their private data or opt out of the data collection arrangements by companies such as Alphabet and Facebook, and hence lessen their ability to offer 'micro-targeted' advertisements. The extent to which users eventually avail themselves of these opportunities to better protect their private data remains to be seen.

Nevertheless, it is likely that today’s leading companies will retain a dominant position in whatever form of targeted digital ad services remains in the new regulatory era. Companies such as Facebook could also move toward seeking subscription fees for the digital platforms and services that it offers.

NASDAQ-100 valuations still not demanding

More broadly, given the ongoing strong earnings performance of companies in the NASDAQ-100 Index, valuations have become even more reasonable of late.

As at end-April 2018, the price-to-forward earnings ratio for the NASDAQ-100 Index had dropped to 18.8 from a recent end-month peak of 21 at end-January. That’s still below the long-run average PE ratio of 24 (which also excludes the bubble years from 1998 to 2000). Based on current Bloomberg earnings expectations, forward earnings are expected to rise a further 8% by end-December 2018, and a further 13% over 2019.

Despite the Australian equity market’s low technology weighting, Australian investors can easily gain exposure to the tech giants on America’s NASDAQ-100 Index – and diversify their portfolios – via the BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (ASX code: NDQ). NDQ aims to track the NASDAQ-100 Index before fees and expenses and can be bought and sold like any share on the ASX.

 

David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, which offers exchange traded products listed on the ASX. This article contains general information only and does not consider the investment circumstances of any individual. Nasdaq®, OMX®, Nasdaq-100®, and Nasdaq-100 Index®, are registered trademarks of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. and are licensed for use by BetaShares.

BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.

 

  •   14 June 2018
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why the four tech giants are not expensive

Is your portfolio too heavy on technology stocks?

Howard Marks warns of market froth

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Latest Updates

Planning

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Superannuation

There's a reason why your super is locked up until your 60s

For decades, it seemed settled. Then one controversial idea reignited a debate that could reshape the financial future of millions. The real question isn’t who’s right or wrong, but whether a long-held assumption deserves another look.

Property

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Retirement

Under-retiring: The greatest retirement risk in a generation

Two retirees. Similar savings. Completely different lives. New research from Challenger reveals why some Australians confidently spend in retirement while others hold back and the overlooked factor shaping retirement decisions.

Five risks to watch in markets

Things you may often hear are: a recession is around the corner, markets are overpriced, the AI sector is about to flop at any moment. It’s like the never-ending laundry pile that sits in my house, it never really disappears.

Investment strategies

Do you qualify as ‘rich’?

What does it mean to be 'rich'? For something so universally desired, it is surprisingly difficult to define. That ambiguity creates a challenge for investors and raises a bigger question about what financial success really looks like.

Investment strategies

If you’re worried about your bond portfolio, you’re missing the point

Most investors think they know what bonds are for. But when markets turn volatile, a surprising misunderstanding can lead to costly decisions. Here’s the overlooked lesson that could change how you view your portfolio.

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.