Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 518

Howards Marks on balancing aggressive and defensive investing – Part 2

On 24 May 2023, Howard Marks spoke by video to MBA students at INSEAD’s Fontainebleau campus outside Paris. Marks is a pioneer of distressed debt investing as an asset class and in 1995, he founded Oaktree Capital Management, where he is now Co-Chairman of a firm with over 1,000 employees globally and more than US$170 billion assets under management. Marks has written two books and is best known for his client memos published since 1990 (free to subscribe). He was interviewed by Roi Lipovetzky and Andras Galambos, students at INSEAD. We published Part 1 last week.

---

In Part 1, Marks said he avoids macro forecasts because they are unknowable and therefore offer no market edge. He concentrates more on the micro risks he can understand if something with a company goes wrong, such as a product going out of favor, too much competition or management mistakes. But he then made an admission that although he believes macro forecasting is “terrible”, every micro forecast requires a macro forecast. To predict company earnings, for example, he needs to know GDP in a future year or whether the economy be “booming or cratering”.

Making neutral forecasts

How does Marks reconcile this micro/macro view? He relies on what he calls “neutral forecasts”, that next year will be like most years or this year, in a neutral extrapolation. He says if everybody thinks GDP will rise by 2%, there is no money to be made by forecasting 2%. Only at 4% or 0% can a forecaster act and make money. But he doesn’t know which is correct, so he ignores both.

“Most of the time, forecasts of a deviation from trend, forecasts of the end of extrapolation, are usually wrong. So, in order to make money from a macro forecast, you have to have a forecast which is non-consensus, which is hard because most of the evidence is reflected in the view of the consensus, and you have to be right, which is hard because the future is hard to predict. You put those two conditional things together and you figure out that macro forecasts have no value.”

He says the things fund managers do are simple, but it's hard to do them in a superior manner that creates added value.

Taking the temperature of the market

Before Marks engages in a new activity or investment, he takes the temperature of the market to gauge the psychology. It can be pessimistic or optimistic and overdone in one direction or another. Nobody can predict psychology. He cites the market reaction during the pandemic on 23 March 2020, after the S&P500 was down a third in the previous month. When the Fed made some announcements, the market started going up, but most people thought the optimism was wrong. Then it went straight up from there, but it was unpredictable. Investors thought that what the Fed was doing would be insufficient, but the market rose anyway.

Marks believes that even when people say they know what the market is going to do, they never know when, because knowing when is a matter of knowing when psychology will turn. He says that whenever he hears a statement which starts with the word when, he rejects it.

Know your balance between aggressive and defensive

Marks was asked about the ideal investor behavior in an overvalued market, such as when prices are higher than intrinsic values. He says it’s about finding the right personal balance:

“Each investor should have a notion for what is the right balance of aggressiveness and defensiveness for them. It's a personal thing, it's subjective, and it varies from one person to another and from one institution to another. So let's say, you have a sense for that. Now the question is, today, should you be at your normal balance, or should you be emphasising offense or defense relative to your norm, whatever your norm is. The S&P was at 4,800 and now it's at 4,200 but last year it was at 3,500. It's kind of in the middle ground. The P/E ratio is a little high, but it's not ridiculously high. The outlook calls for a recession, but nobody says it's going to be a profound recession. We're seeing inflation, super-high deficits and debts of the U.S. and other countries, plus the geopolitical uncertainty in Ukraine and in China and so forth. So, I would be a little balanced toward defensiveness today rather than aggressiveness. And you'd have to be creative to sketch out a very optimistic future for the next year. But don't listen to me because I'm incapable of it.”

The future is always unclear

It’s welcome to hear Marks say he does not rely on forecasting and his opinion has little merit, despite the fact that he is one of the leading global names in investing. People still want to know about his forecasts even when he tells them they are a waste of time. The investment industry is desperate for sage guesses to remove some future doubt, but the amount of time the financial media, advisers and investors spend on this pontificating does not match its dubious value. Marks expands:

“I don't know what's going to happen. The future is unusually murky, unusually uncertain. Well, I believe that there are two kinds of times. There's the time when the future is clear. And there's the time when the future is murky. The main difference is that when people think the future is clear, they're probably wrong. The future is always uncertain. And the belief that it's not tends to get people into trouble because they become sanguine at a time when they should not be.”

The biggest mistakes companies make

Marks is the world’s leading investor in distressed debt, and he sees companies at their worst, where they have made mistakes. Oaktree steps in with capital, often to rescue the business when other lenders disappear. But shareholders and the company pay a high price as Oaktree controls a chunk of equity in the form of convertible debt, rather than simply lending money. When the company’s fortunes improve, Oaktree becomes a major shareholder and enjoys the upside, not only a fixed income return. He says:

“Companies that get into trouble either can't imagine a negative-enough scenario or overestimate their ability to succeed in a negative scenario. One of my favorite sayings is never forget the person who was six feet tall who drowned crossing the stream that was five feet deep on average. The idea of surviving on average is a ridiculous idea. Like a skydiver, on average, who is successful 98% of the time. It's not a good idea. You have to be successful all the time, which means you have to survive all the time, which means you have to survive in the worst of times. And so, when companies over-lever, it's because they overestimate their ability to persist in a negative environment. And then, the negative environment comes along, and they melt down.”

Marks has invested through many different markets, including when Leveraged Buy-Outs (LBOs) were completed with 96% debt and 4% equity. Leverage magnifies successes but it also magnifies failures, and equity carries a company through the tough times. Often, the deals with too-little equity fail. He says management might allow for revenues to fall 10% but not 20%, and then rather than profits falling 60%, they go down 100%.

But he also supports the right level of leverage, not the least. In his student days, 20 American companies were rated AAA, and while it gave them bulletproof balance sheets, their returns on equity were compromised. They realised that a rating of AA or A was high enough and still gave a low cost of capital. But the major mistakes come from too much debt.

 

Graham Hand is Editor-At-Large for Firstlinks. This is Part 2 of a selection of Howard Marks’ comments to INSEAD’s Fontainebleau students on 24 May 2023. The full discussion is here. This article is general information only.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.