Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 4

Is defined contribution superannuation fit for retirement?

Many people ask me what I think about Stronger Super and the legislation based on the Cooper Review recommendations. Overall, it looks pretty good, although naturally, various compromises and changes of emphasis and approach have occurred here and there. Of course, we also need to see it work in practice.

The big disappointment, though, is retirement. Here, it seems super funds weren’t ready or the changes looked too dramatic. Whatever the reason, we are left with an unfinished retirement system; just a continuation of the accumulation phase. Like the 401(k) regime in the United States, our defined contribution (DC) system was never designed to provide retirement income, but just a lump sum to retire with.

We now realise there is a lot more work to be done in building a proper retirement system. That said, I do acknowledge Bill Shorten’s efforts in pursuing, through the Superannuation Roundtable, ways that new retirement income products could be brought to market. So, progress is being made.

But, what is wrong with DC retirement savings schemes? Well, think of the age pension. Its cash flows are fortnightly; it is AAA-rated; and it keeps up with price and wage inflation. It is the gold standard of retirement products, but the obvious problem is that it is only a safety net. Nobody aspires to live at the standard of living afforded by the age pension. But, the point is all about the design features.

Can the private sector create products that work like the age pension? The answer is that Australian life insurance companies can deliver private pensions that are effectively (apart from obvious differences) the same as the age pension. Okay, what then? Well these need to be integrated into both the super system and into our consciousness: a partial ‘re-intermediation’ of super, accessing specialist balance sheets to provide the secure income in retirement that a purely DC approach cannot by itself deliver.

Governments and corporations around the world realised some time ago that defined benefit (DB) pensions that involved carrying market, inflation and longevity risk for people in retirement were simply too risky and expensive other than for some specialists.

DC seemed like the perfect solution. Because a DC super scheme does not aim to provide the retiree with a particular level of income in retirement, there is no target from which there can be a shortfall.

DB plans pool the risk related to an unknown length of life for each person across the pool, while DC plans leave it to the participants to deal with on their own. This makes most DC retirees like small insurance companies taking on their own longevity risk without any additional capital or the skills to do so. As a person ages, longevity risk overtakes even market risk as the key risk in retirement.

DC also tends to encourage a ‘wealth management’ mindset in retirement, as opposed to a ‘retirement income’ approach. Under the latter approach, retirees get regular income and protection from inflation and longevity risk as a ‘floor’. Only after this floor has been secured and precautionary liquidity is available do they consider exposure to growth assets. There is quite a difference between the two approaches.

Are target date funds the solution? Partly, but it depends on what the retirement solution looks like. Asset allocation alone doesn’t go the distance in protecting against all of the risks in retirement. If a target date fund is merely reducing exposure to volatile asset classes as a person ages, then it is helping with some of the issues – such as sequencing risk and portfolio size effect - but it does not address longevity risk or exposure to inflation.

What is it about retirement that makes a DC fund that is relying solely on asset allocation struggle to provide an adequate solution for retirees? In retirement:

  • The ‘financial dynamics’ of accumulation are reversed. There is generally no regular wage or salary (or other income) and the retiree starts drawing down on their savings to fund consumption. This makes it a fundamentally different proposition from accumulating savings and introduces new risks. For example, dollar cost averaging works in reverse, against the retiree’s interests.
  • Retirees are exposed to longevity risk: the risk that they outlive their savings by reason of increasing life expectancies.
  • The sustainability of retirement savings becomes a new and important concept. This has two elements: the probability of success of the retirement plan (expressed as a percentage of likelihood of reaching a particular age and still being able to access sufficient income) and the range of potential outcomes based on market returns that deviate from long term averages.
  • Retirees’ aversion to loss is greatly increased. In a large US study carried out in 2007, just under half the retirees surveyed said they would be unwilling to risk even $10 in a bet that offered a 50% chance of winning $100.
  • Close to retirement, more of a retiree’s money is exposed to potential losses and so negative market movements around that time have the most adverse impact on sustainability of cash flows.
  • A retiree’s ability to recover from poor investment returns (or take advantage of lower market prices) is generally limited.
  • Inflation takes on a new dimension because the retiree is disconnected from wage rises and can generally only maintain purchasing power via the age pension or explicitly inflation-linked investments. Contrary to a widely-held view, equities do not provide an adequate hedge against inflation.
  • Plans based on long term averages and notions like ‘investing for the long term’ are generally inappropriate in retirement. This is because approximately half of a typical retiree’s savings are consumed in the first 10 years; later retirement spending is funded from dollars created by compounding returns during retirement.
  • The financial needs of retirees differ. The spending profile for someone with $1,000,000 in super won’t be the same as someone who has only $100,000, but it won’t be ten times as much though. A different rate of outflow from the investment portfolio might require a completely different investment mix to get a suitable outcome. The shape of cash flow is important in retirement.

There are no universal solutions to funding a retirement, but it is critical that policy makers address these matters with the increasing number of baby boomers approaching retirement. Over 60% of the value of the superannuation system is owned by the 45-65 year-old cohort.

Part of the solution will lie in thinking about the partial re-intermediation of our DC super system so that retirees get a promise of a certain level of income above the age pension that will last as long as they do.

Jeremy Cooper is Chairman, Retirement Income at Challenger Limited.

Disclosure: Jeremy Cooper is a full-time employee of Challenger Limited and has interests in equity securities issued by Challenger, which is an issuer of annuities in Australia.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Time to build a super system fit for retirement

The comprehensive income product for retirement

10 years on from the GFC, retirees still jittery

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel's share winners and loser plus budget reality check

Among the share success stories is a poor personal experience as Telstra's service needs improving. Plus why the new budget announcements on downsizing and buying a home don't deserve the super hype.

Grantham interview on the coming day of reckoning

Jeremy Grantham has seen it all before, with bubbles every 15 years or so. The higher you go, the longer and greater the fall. You can have a high-priced asset or a high-yielding asset, but not both at the same time.

Five stock recoveries not hanging on COVID predictions

The focus on predicting the recovery from the pandemic is the wrong emphasis. Better to identify great companies benefitting from market changes over a three- to five-year horizon with or without COVID.

BHP v Rio v Fortescue: it's all about the iron ore price

Don’t look at an earnings forecast or a DCF valuation or a broker target price for a mining company. Share price forecasts are only as good as the commodity price assumptions they are based on, and they are a guess.

Blink and you missed a seismic shift in these stocks

Blink and it happened. If announcements in this sector were made by a producer of iron ore, gas, copper or some new tech, the news would have been splashed across the front pages. Have we witnessed a major change?

Peak to peak, which LIC managers performed during COVID?

A comprehensive review of dozens of LICs shows how they performed in the crucial 'peak to peak' of COVID. This 14 months tested the mettle and strategies of a sector often under fire, with many strong results.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Jane Hume shakes up super, but what will it achieve?

The Government calls 'Your Future, Your Super' the most significant reforms since the start of compulsory super. Stapling has benefits and we should remove poor funds, but performance comparisons are difficult.

Superannuation

Launch of the 'Wealth of Experience' podcast

Welcome to the first episode of our fortnightly podcast, Wealth of Experience, with Graham Hand and Peter Warnes. They have a combined 99 years in markets and they will share this experience to help build your wealth.

Investment strategies

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Investment strategies

Where will investment returns come from in 2021?

There are only three sources of returns when investing in companies. Whether an investment delivers on dividends, earnings or valuation expansion determines performance, and the contribution of each varies over time.

Investment strategies

Portfolio composition and what you find under the bonnet

Powerful structural themes such as technology disruption and demographic changes may disguise what is driving company success. Watch these broad categories as they may not apply in ways you expect.

Investment strategies

When rates rise, it's time to look for new players on the team

Long duration assets such as government bonds and property have benefitted from falling interest rates, but a turn is coming. It's time to find assets that may benefit from rising rates, such as private debt.

Investment strategies

How are high net worths investing and thinking now?

Citi research delves into how high net worth investors are feeling in the current market, and how they are investing during the drama of the pandemic. There is plenty of optimism and a willingness to stay invested.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.