Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 153

Large funds need to earn retirement loyalty

This is the third in a series of articles highlighting the leadership attributes that can help superannuation industry executives move from their historical focus on accumulation to a whole of life view and particularly the provision of retirement income.

For executives in the super industry, driving change from an accumulation to a whole of life focus is a major change management exercise. How do you drive change management? Leadership expert Harvard’s John Kotter identifies creating a sense of urgency as step 1 of the 8-step programme he prescribes in Leading Change.

Where is the sense of urgency?

It’s often said that we need a ‘burning platform’ to create the sense of urgency to drive change. While APRA statistics suggest we should have that urgency due to poor member retention, rarely do we hear the word ‘fire’ from our executives.

According to the 2015 APRA report, over 50% of funds are losing more accounts than are coming in and, likewise, over 50% have higher outflows than inflows when benefits payments are included. And most funds are doing a poor job in retaining members into pension phase, with the number of lump sum payments dominating pension account openings by a factor of four to one.

The retention problems can be devastating for fund economics and, like demographic changes, can manifest themselves slowly at first and be overlooked. But continued gradual losses of members or outflows erode a fund’s economic competitiveness. The industry would appear to have an impending loyalty problem.

Fred Reichheld has been perhaps the most articulate advocate of ‘loyalty management’ as an imperative of business success. The author of The Ultimate Question and creator of the Net Promoter Score championed the idea that loyalty leadership was the key driver of success in many businesses.

Loyalty drives firm economics. Firms with better client loyalty enjoy both higher revenues and lower costs. Higher revenues come from more sales to existing clients, the additional revenues from not losing clients or holding onto them longer, and from referrals from satisfied clients. Lower costs come from satisfied clients having a lower cost to serve for many reasons (eg acquisition costs are defrayed over a longer tenured relationship). And lower marketing costs accrue from referral.

Driving client loyalty

Even before I joined Vanguard in 1980, the redemption ratio (the inverse of retention) was a key driving variable. We drove redemption rates to less than half the industry average. That meant Vanguard each year had to sell billions less, later tens of billions less, and today hundreds of billions less than competitors to exceed them on cash flows. That fact, certainly more than large or clever marketing spend, was the driver in making Vanguard the top US mutual funds manager by cashflow for nearly every one of the last 20 years.

Client loyalty is something you have to earn and can’t buy or take for granted. It’s multi-dimensional as clients appraise your features and services against competing offers. It’s built on trust over time, is hard won and easily lost. It’s often built on a relationship - personal or brand-related - and a sense of engagement. The heart of a firm’s strategy and execution should be beating to earning client loyalty.

But it’s also obvious that there are certain critical points in customers’ lives when client loss is more likely. The two most important for our industry are job change and approaching retirement. We’ll focus on retention at retirement here. People over 50 control more than 60% of assets in the super system and balances are, on average, much larger for pre-retirees and retirees than for younger members.

Member retention in retirement

It should be an urgent and galvanising problem that many superannuation funds are losing more than 90% of their members going into retirement phase. Ironic indeed that a fund should nurture its members throughout their working careers and then lose them when the fund should be helping them with the ultimate mission of the super industry: assistance through retirement years.

Talking to fund executives, few have really taken the retirement phase loyalty challenge to be a matter of urgency, and there are even some executives who think the fund is only about accumulation. Some funds don’t even offer a pension choice.

It’s a loyalty leadership challenge. A multi-year and multi-dimensional approach to increasing the organisational focus on retirement is needed. The fund needs to demonstrate its credentials and interest in helping members with their journey to and through retirement. Raising awareness that the fund is there for the member in retirement is a key element.

Providing retirement income forecasts is an obvious and effective way to start members thinking about retirement with the fund, supplemented by coaching and advice solutions. Advice is probably the best way to help members with retirement. And as traditional advice won’t reach the vast majority of members, digital advice has to come to the forefront, with the option of triaging to traditional telephone based or face to face advice when needed.

Simplifying the transition to retirement is also critical. A complex transition is the enemy of member loyalty. Behavioural finance research shows how making something easy is a winning strategy for serving members. A default solution, like the government’s mooted Comprehensive Income Product for Retirement, may well be part of the answer.

It's critical to the member that they make the right choice and get the help they need to do so. The right decisions at retirement are challenging and highly personal. Default MySuper may get many members through their accumulation phase but in retirement members will need a personalised solution.

To focus on maintaining loyalty, the right metrics are critical. As Peter Drucker argued, “what gets measured gets improved.” Funds should establish their loyalty metrics around retirement and then work relentlessly to improve them.

Fund executives have a burning platform to move fast on client retention around the retirement phase. They must develop the sense of mission that can motivate their teams around highly measureable goals. Funds that lead and win in maintaining client loyalty through retirement will grow and prosper.

 

Jeremy Duffield is Co-Founder of SuperEd. See www.supered.com.au. He was the Managing Director and Founder of Vanguard Investments Australia, and he retired as Chairman in 2010.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.