Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 448

Lessons for family businesses from the House of Gucci movie

The crime drama movie released last year, House of Gucci, is Ridley Scott's controversial interpretation based on the true story of Patrizia Reggiani and her conviction for murdering her ex-husband Maurizio Gucci.

The prestige product manufacturer, Gucci, has seen the potential for negative publicity for its brand arising from the film and has asserted that it is a work of fiction. I have no way of knowing if the film is factually incorrect but, from 25 years of advising family business owners, I would say there is no doubt that there were disputes in the family.

In 1993, after one grandson, Maurizio, sold his inherited 50% interest in Gucci to the same investment firm he had brought in to buy up his relatives’ shares, there was no longer anyone from the Gucci family involved in running the firm. His lavish spending and lackluster management left the company in a parlous position when he finally relinquished control.

Maurizio would go from reluctantly joining his family firm to ruthlessly removing his relatives to execute his vision to save the company.

He was murdered on the steps of his office building in Milan in 1995. The film explains that his wife, Patrizia Reggiani, was sentenced to 29 years in prison for orchestrating the murder, and she was released in 2014 after serving 16 years. She could have been released even earlier but she turned down a work-release programme, reportedly saying, “I never worked a day in my life, and I don’t intend to start now.”

The movie ends with an inheritance dispute as often happens. In our experience, behind most such disputes there is family drama that could have been handled much better.

After her release, Patrizia was asked by paparazzi in the street why she hired a gunman to kill Maurizio rather than do it herself, she said, “My eyesight is not so good, I didn’t want to miss.” According to the new afterword in the movie tie-in edition of the book on which the film is based, the wife succeeded, against her two daughters who presumably wanted the inheritance, in her claim for a substantial annuity from the Gucci estate. In 2014, she said, “I still feel like a Gucci – in fact, the most Gucci of them all.”

The other family members did not fare much better. Another grandson, Paolo, filed for bankruptcy in 1993 while his father, Aldo, served time in prison for tax evasion.

Roberto, one of Aldo’s sons not depicted in the movie, went on to run a small leather goods business in Florence after selling his shares of the family company, and once said, “The Guccis were a great family. I ask forgiveness for all their mistakes. Who doesn’t make mistakes?”

I first came across this story in a book considering family succession by Alan Crosbie called 'Don’t Leave It To The Children'. Crosbie writes with authority being the fifth generation of an Irish newspaper dynasty. He writes:

“Guccio Gucci suffered from a bad sense of parental fairness. He had two sons, and in order to be fair to both of them, he divided his company equally between them: each son received 50% of the shares in the family firm. Now, that figure has a certain magic to it. The expression ‘They divided the business 50-50’ has a wonderful ring to it. Unless you’re one of those accountants or lawyers who has had to mop up the results of such an even split between family members.”

At Legacy Law, we are one of the mopper-uppers. The way to avoid family disputes is to have good communication, adequate preparation and helpful dispute resolution  - by which we mean avoiding the civil and criminal courts. 

Well-respected commentator on family business, Dennis Jaffe, recently opined:

“Major decisions were hard to make since the brothers were equal owners and it was never clear who was in charge. As in many families since biblical times, interpersonal dramas and sibling rivalry were dominant, and they were on course to disrupt a thriving business”.

The film ends with a note that acknowledges the company’s current leadership and that it has an estimated value of US$60 billion. It just has no family owners.

In the book, as Maurizio rises in the company, his own father Rodolfo tells his wife, “Once he gets money and power, he will change.” As humans, we all change but it is positive change that is required if families are to avoid falling victim to disputes and miss the opportunity to Be A Better AncestorTM.

If you have a business, ask yourself if you want to build one of the great business families. They are plenty of good and bad examples but the good ones do a lot more than rely on good luck and goodwill.

Have you simply left the shares equally to the children? Equality, without more governance, communication and consensus can leave a family business exposed to public ridicule, or worse.

 

Donal Griffin is the Principal of Legacy Law, a Sydney-based legal firm specialising in protecting family assets, and author of 'An Irish book of living and dying' (the first book in the 'Be A Better Ancestor' series). Legacy Law is not licensed to give financial advice and this is general information.

 

2 Comments
Donal Griffin
March 11, 2022

Thanks Matt

Matt Meehan
March 06, 2022

Thanks Donal

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

The legal fallout when a carer becomes a partner

Six common estate planning errors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.