Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 55

Material shift from production to distribution

There is a fundamental change occurring in the global production of basic materials. The Asian economies, hungry for growth, are combining access to cheap labour and cheap energy on a massive scale. The result? An oversupply of materials, which is destabilising the Australian market.

The production of basic materials, such as petrol and cement, is a capital-intensive exercise. Historically, these materials would be supplied by a handful of local companies that would build the infrastructure at great cost, and in return, enjoy monopolistic pricing power. As a result, the producers of basic materials in Australia have been relatively sheltered from the rising powers in Asia due to distance.

Australian producers uncompetitive

But with global shipping rates decreasing and the Australian currency remaining relatively strong, Australian production has become uncompetitive. The giants of Australian industry, which enjoyed favourable market dynamics for decades, are faced with the reality that their business models must fundamentally change – and fast.

Let’s first look at the impact on the Australian fuel market, which was traditionally dominated by BP, Shell, Mobil and Caltex. The companies would import crude oil from Africa or Singapore to produce petrol or diesel in their onshore refineries.

Singapore was traditionally the only refiner to export to Australia in volume, but in the past five years there has been considerable investment in the region. Because fuel is refined in accordance to universal standards, a wide range of commoditised products can now be sourced from anywhere in the region – Japan, Taiwan, China, Korea, India.

For Australian refiners, it is now more economical to convert existing refineries into import terminals. Not only does this outsource the risk of production (which can be very volatile), but the lead time is reduced from months to weeks.

Caltex made the decision in 2012 to restructure its supply chain and focus on distribution. It is likely that it will import all of its product within ten years. Due to its global reach, Shell has chosen to direct its resources to exploration. It has since sold its Australian petrol stations and refineries, but will retain ownership of its aviation fuel business and grease plants in Brisbane. There are reports that BP is also considering the sale of its refineries in Queensland and Western Australia.

The same shifts are occurring in the region’s cement industry. The main producers in Australia are Adelaide Brighton, Boral and Cement Australia. In the early days, each player had invested in a particular state due to the natural monopoly afforded to capital-intensive cement production. This limited competition skewed the bargaining power in favour of the resident-producer, and so competitors would be forced to accept the terms of their interstate counterparts when supplying product outside of their primary markets.

But in the past decade, there has been a dramatic shift in the global cement market, which is described by Boral in its 2013 Review. Ten years ago, 95% of cement was produced in Australia, while 5% was imported. In 2013, 70% of cement was produced in Australia, and 30% was imported. This trend is likely to continue, as Australia’s demand for cement is 10 million tonnes a year, while China is producing 2.15 billion tonnes a year.

This has dramatically changed the economics for the local incumbents. Like the fuel refiners, the incumbents are focused on shifting their value chain to the distribution of building materials, rather than production. Boral has converted its production facility in Victoria to an import facility. Adelaide Brighton has invested in Malaysia to source product from overseas. Cement Australia also has plans to build import facilities, and has recently terminated a major contract with Adelaide Brighton in South Australia as a result.

So where will the value lie as these major players transition from production to distribution? Does this create investment opportunities?

Pricing power

Typically, distributors aren’t compelling value propositions because they don’t control the product, which means it is difficult to exercise pricing power. But this dynamic may in fact be favourable to the incumbents, as they change from a volatile, capital-intensive business, to a model that is characterised by steadier cash flows.

Sustainable value will be dependent upon the companies’ bargaining power with suppliers. In the case of Caltex, the company has favourable bargaining power with suppliers given the number of mega refineries in the region. If Caltex can build an efficient operating model, this may provide enough protection to withstand the Asian advances in the medium term. But given how rapidly the global market is changing, the landscape may be very different in another ten years.

 

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘Value.able

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.