Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 658

Meg on SMSFs: Payday super – why should SMSF members even care?

I must admit Payday super largely passed me by until recently. Certainly I thought it was mainly an issue for me as an employer rather than someone receiving employer contributions into my SMSF.

As an employer, I have to make sure my company can comply with the new rules from 1 July 2026 to pay super contributions for my staff within 7 business days of paying their salaries. And it’s not good enough that the money leaves my company’s bank account within 7 days, it has to actually land in the employee’s super fund and be ready to be allocated by the fund in that time – including passing through the clearing house we use for super.

Fortunately we can tick that box.

But Payday super actually has a few ramifications for SMSFs receiving employer contributions and it’s worth being aware of these.

On time lodgement of the annual return just got even more important

If an SMSF’s annual return is more than two weeks overdue, its regulation details are removed from an online service called “Super Fund Lookup” on the first business day of the following month.

An employer who tries contributing to an SMSF where its regulation details have been removed will generally see that payment rejected and contributions will need to go to another fund. There’s a special extension (to 20 days rather than 7) when this happens. But it’s still a very narrow window – and this is the bit that’s new, we now have a very tight timeframe to get it right.

Of course, this is music to my ears as an administrator of 5,000 funds. I love anything that encourages my clients to respond promptly when we ask for information to complete their annual return or send it to them for signing. But it will certainly introduce some additional pressure – particularly since the vast majority of SMSF annual returns are due in a few weeks on 15 May.

It also means anyone who knows their SMSF return is not going to be lodged on time (perhaps there’s a long running issue they need to deal with that’s stopping them) should probably set up a new (temporary) super account in a public fund now to make sure their employer has “somewhere” to pay post 1 July 2026 contributions into.

Check the SMSF’s bank account

From 1 July 2026, all super funds receiving employer contributions must have an “NPP enabled” bank account. This includes SMSFs, other than where the contributions are from related party employers.

NPP stands for New Payments Platform.  I’d never heard this term before – although I now understand the fact that I see “Osko” on my personal banking app (and those payments happen instantly) tells me my personal bank account is NPP enabled. I’ve double checked my SMSF’s bank account is too.

Note – employers don’t have to pay via Osko etc (they could still use EFT or BPAY if they wanted to). But they might start because they only have 7 days to get the money from their bank account into the SMSF’s. And importantly, unless the SMSF is only receiving employer contributions from related employers, it has to be ready to take payments this way.

Most major banks already offer NPP enabled accounts, so I expect most SMSFs will be fine. The ones to check would be cases where employer contributions are currently being paid to the cash accounts of wrap or platform providers.

And of course if any of this prompts a change of bank account, the details of any new bank accounts must be given to the ATO.

Can the SMSF’s software support Member Verification Requests?

Payday super is not just about when a contribution is received. It’s also about whether the fund can accept and allocate it.

From 1 July 2026, employers have to use the ATO’s new Member Verification Request (MVR) process before making a super contribution to a fund for an employee for the first time.

The MVR allows employers to confirm whether a fund can accept a contribution for a particular employee.

Most SMSF accountants use one of three major software providers (Class, BGL or SuperMate) and they are all over this. They’ll make sure the process is fully automated and the fund’s accountant won’t need to do anything for this process to work. But if an SMSF’s accountant uses something different, it’s worth checking.

Watch excess contributions

Nothing has changed when it comes to the limits on concessional contributions each year ($30,000 for 205/26 for most people, going up to $32,500 next year). But what might change is that employers who are getting ready for Payday super could bring more payments into this year or have more occurring next year than usual.

For example, imagine an employer has historically paid super contributions quarterly. At the end of July 2025, a payment would have been received for the April – June 2025 contributions. But as part of getting ready for Payday super, they’ve changed practices. They’re planning to make the April – June 2026 contributions just before 30 June 2026 and then they’ll start making contributions every fortnight in line with their employees’ pay periods from 1 July. That means five quarters worth of contributions will happen in 2025/26. For most people it won’t be a problem. But someone aiming to maximise their concessional contributions now has a problem. The Government has said they’ll have measures to deal with this – but at the moment they’re only talking about dealing with excesses in 2026/27.

There’s certainly plenty to think about for employers when it comes to Payday super. But equally, a few traps to be aware of for employees who receive super contributions into their SMSF.

 

Meg Heffron is the Managing Director of Heffron SMSF Solutions, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and it does not constitute any recommendation or advice. It does not consider any personal circumstances and is based on an understanding of relevant rules and legislation at the time of writing.

For more articles and papers from Heffron, please click here.

 

  •   15 April 2026
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

Meg on SMSFs: Ageing and its financial challenges

Meg on SMSFs: Facts and figures 2023/24

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.