Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 225

Will millennials change the investment landscape?

Millennials recently became the largest demographic cohort, and now 29% of the Australian population was born between 1980 and 2000. By 2030, they will represent the largest source of income and consumer spending, earning two out of every three dollars in Australia. While much has been written about how the shift in spending patterns will change the retail landscape (online over brick and mortar and experiences over materialism) relatively little research has focused on the changes to investing and asset management. Over the next two decades millennials will not only become the largest earners but are also set to inherit significant wealth, further increasing their importance to the investment industry.

Tech savvy and socially responsible

Much of the focus on the investments of millennials has to date revolved around the growth of passive/ETF investing (according to Commsec, millennials now account for 25% of ETF trades) and the use of ‘robo-advice’. Both have largely been driven by lower minimum investments and perceived low fees, making them attractive entry level propositions. While these trends are likely to continue, millennial investors are also likely to move into more traditional investment products as they build wealth over their lifetimes. Indeed, we are already beginning to see this, with Commsec finding that 50% of all new customers are under 35 years of age while millennial customers have increased by 51% over the last five years and now represent 28% of all active members.

With 87% of millennials believing that business success should be measured by more than just financial performance, one of the largest changes is likely to be the continued growth in responsible, sustainable or ‘impact’ investing. Growth in these strategies is accelerating in Australia, with rise in funds invested in ‘core responsible investments’ from $11.9 billion in 2006 to $64.9 billion in 2016 and reaching 4.5% of total assets, as shown below. Market share remained under 2% for the majority of the last decade, but have surged in the last few years.

Core responsible investment strategies as a percentage of assets under management

Source: RIAA, Responsible Investment Benchmark Report 2017 Australia.

With 85% of millennials interested in or currently using social impact investments, this trend is likely to accelerate further as they make up a larger proportion of the market. Additionally, 85% of millennials now consider investment decisions as a way to express their values. Financial investments will become more aligned with social, political and environmental factors.

At CFSGAM, we recently conducted a survey of our own staff (30% of whom are millennials) on the extent of their individual beliefs on responsible investment. The survey found that:

  • 80% of staff believe considering ESG issues leads to more complete analyses and better-informed investment decisions.
  • 85% supported the view that asset owners should, as part of their duties, consider both the direct and indirect ESG impacts of their investments.
  • 75% believed that the risks and opportunities associated with ESG factors are not being captured in market values.

This tells us that millennials are ahead of the curve when thinking about the impact and implications of responsible investment strategies. Further, they are more likely to favour responsible investment strategies and are also more likely to believe that investing responsibly does not negatively impact performance. Indeed, there is strong evidence that utilising ESG factors improves performance, with a recent BofAML Report finding that they could have helped investors avoid 90% of bankruptcies.

The funds management industry will need to adapt and responsible investing will become increasingly mainstream and less of a niche or nice to have addition to traditional offerings.

 

Harry Moore is Head of Business Development for Australia and New Zealand at Colonial First State Global Asset Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

 

5 Comments
Chris
November 02, 2017

And as a side note to the financial planning industry, the time to get involved and interested in millennial clients (and anyone else who isn’t a boomer like themselves, by the way) is BEFORE they grow their wealth, not when you think they might just suddenly inherit a whole lot (which is not a given and probably the exception, rather than the rule).

Most planners I’ve talked to look down their nose and over their bifocals at my modest, sub-million net worth and think it’s not worth bothering about.

Otherwise, you just come across as a gold digger, who suddenly becomes interested in marrying an old (wo)man with a dodgy ticker who has just won the lottery. It’s pretty obvious.

Gen Y
November 04, 2017

Oh Chris, I'm sure they're interested. They'll surely sell you some life insurance...

Rick
November 06, 2017

Wow, "bifocals", seriously? You've just painted the picture of a Bank Manager circa 1972, pretty outdated, cynical stuff. I don't know who you've been talking to, but the advisers I know are all energetic, progressive, and forward looking - they're very happy working with less established clients. In fact, helping younger clients move decisively towards achieving their goals is the part of my job I actually enjoy the most. And btw if an adviser charges a flat, dollar based fee, how much accumulated wealth a client has is irrelevant from an adviser remuneration perspective.

Gen Y: Life insurance and estate planning is a serious part of the wealth building/wealth protection equation, and for an adviser to not discuss it with a client would be negligent in the extreme. Let's not have a shot about 'selling' life insurance?

Chris
November 02, 2017

“set to inherit significant wealth, further increasing their importance to the investment industry.”

Really ? Sorry, but as a Gen-X (born late-70s), I don’t expect or demand that my parents (one of them already being in a nursing home) will have anything to leave me (as one of four kids), in that the only thing they own are some cash, premium bonds and the house (which is nothing special).

They will likely need that money to look after themselves and any aged care requirements.

If they do leave me any money, it’s a good surprise, but I’d go and pay my mortgage off, then put my daughter through school / university, and if there was anything left after that (unlikely), then look at investing it.

Frank
November 02, 2017

Why are people born in 1980 called ‘millennials’?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Four reasons ESG investing continues to grow

Looking deeper than the home page of roboadvice

Sustainable, responsible or ethical – what’s the difference?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.