Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 44

Too much jam: the consequences of choice overload

In academic circles, the phrase ‘too much jam’ doesn’t refer to over-consumption of jam (though a useful reminder at this festive time of year) but rather a well-known behavioural experiment by the psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper. It refers to the problem of choice overload and it provides useful insights for the funds management industry.

The paper is titled “When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?, and was published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2000. It has been cited in over 1500 subsequent pieces of research. The paper contains three choice experiments.

In the first experiment, shoppers at an upmarket supermarket encountered a tasting booth that displayed either a limited range (just six) or an extensive selection (varieties) of different flavours of jam. This type of research is known as a field experiment and research assistants dressed up as shop employees ran the jam-tasting booths so that outcomes could be carefully observed.

In the second experiment students in an introductory social psychology class were given the opportunity to write an extra-credit (ie not compulsory) two-page essay. Students were given either six or 30 potential essay topics on which they could choose to write.

The third experiment involved tasting chocolate (where do I volunteer?!). Participants were presented with either a limited or extensive range of chocolates from which to make an initial choice. After this some people were given the chocolate of their choice to taste while others had a chocolate chosen for them.

So what results came out of these experiments? In the first (jam booth) experiment:

  • consumers appeared to be more attracted to a tasting booth that offered significant choice, with 60% of customers stopping at the booth with the extensive selection
  • however, significantly more shoppers purchased a jar of jam when presented with only the limited selection compared with an extensive range (30% versus 3%).

In the second (extra-credit essay) experiment:

  • students showed greater participation when offered limited choice (74% undertook the essay when offered limited topic choice versus 60% when offered extensive topic choice)
  • students offered limited choice attained higher grades than those offered a wider topic choice.

In the final (chocolate) experiment:

  • those offered an extensive range of chocolates found the choice decision more enjoyable than those offered a limited range, but they also found the decision-making process relatively more difficult and more frustrating
  • for those who tasted the chocolate they chose, subjects who chose from a limited range were more satisfied with their choice than their counterparts who chose from an extensive range.

So what do we take out of all this? Clearly the results highlight the issue of choice overload where too much choice can have adverse effects on outcomes. It also highlights the complexity of choice.

There are many examples of different industries which cleverly account for consumer behavioural choice issues. For instance, Aldi supermarkets only provide one or two choices in each product category, and many car companies have over recent years reduced the number and complexity of choices within their model range.

Choice and investment decisions

Is the funds management and superannuation industry similarly affected by these complex choice behavioural issues? Logic would suggest yes. Why wouldn’t investment decisions be affected by the size of the range of investment options? Making investment decisions is complex and too much choice may create similar experiences as in the chocolate experiment.

Indeed, in a subsequent Pension Research Council Working Paper by Iyengar, this time with Wei Jiang and Gur Huberman (entitled How Much Choice is Too Much?: Contributions to 401(k) Retirement Plans), the authors explore whether extensive choice is a deterrent to participation in a pension plan. They find that participation in 401(k) retirement plans falls as the range of investment choices increases. Note that plan participation in the US is not compulsory, and so this result isn’t directly applicable in Australia, where we have the Superannuation Guarantee. However, it lends weight to the argument that choice overload can be a deterrent to making an active choice, and can lead to a difficult and frustrating investment decision-making.

Yet the concept of choice overload is challenged by the rapid growth of SMSFs (with no restriction on investment choice) and the increasing range of investment options offered by super funds.

While SMSFs offer huge flexibility, they do not compel members to make an active choice from a defined menu list. Some investors may run very simple investment strategies (high allocations to cash and domestic equities) while some SMSFs may be established with an investment strategy already pre-conceived. So an argument can be made that SMSFs actually provide the benefits of choice without the restriction of a limited choice menu or the stress of an extensive choice menu.

When it comes to menu choice, the retail funds have historically offered much more choice than industry, public sector and corporate funds, generally more than 200 choices for a retail fund versus around only 10 or less for a non-retail fund. So does this mean that retail funds encounter substantially higher level of choice overload problems than non-retail funds? Not necessarily – it most likely depends on the financial service model. Many retail super fund investors have probably been placed in these funds by a financial planner who is trained to make investment decisions; of course they may have their own technical, agency and behavioural issues. However they would most likely be better placed to handle larger investment choice menus than the fund member.

What will be interesting to watch are moves by industry funds to provide a greater range of choice to their members in an attempt to stop the flow of high balance members shifting their accumulation balance to an SMSF. It may be that many members choose to switch to this broader offering (a la the more extensive jam booth) but perhaps, if this extended range of investments is not complemented by advice, we may see choice overload issues come to the fore.

Choice overload is one of many complex issues associated with the study of how choices are made. It is a major (and realistically incorrect) assumption that rational financial decisions will always be made. We are soon to enter a major review of the Australian financial system and choice should be considered in far greater detail rather than simply taking an ideological view that more choice and more freedom is always better.

 

David Bell’s independent advisory business is St Davids Rd Advisory. David is working towards a PhD at University of NSW.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Three rules to invest by

Lending policies can spoil good SMSF strategies

A better approach to post-retirement planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.