Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 427

Never Evergrande: where to from here?

The failing financial position of China Evergrande Group, one of China’s largest residential property developers, has captured the world’s attention for fears of a broader economic and social fall-out. Property investment and related construction and appliance activity is a substantial contributor to China’s GDP, up to 25% by some estimates. Hence, the risk of a sudden collapse of Evergrande could threaten capital providers and home buyer sentiment leading to a downturn in property investment and the Chinese economy.

This could have far-reaching implications for the regional and global economy. The challenge is to understand the depth of the issues facing Evergrande, its industry competitors and the Chinese residential market.

Our global REIT portfolio has no direct exposure to the Chinese property developers, including Evergrande. We have long doubted the quality of the earnings and the strength of their balance sheets.

We stress that pontificating on the broader implications for Chinese central planning policy and the consequent outcomes of Evergrande’s collapse is a fool’s errand. Recall few experts predicted the U.S. subprime crisis, and countless pundits have been predicting the demise of the Chinese residential market for a decade. Notwithstanding, we have reached out to a broad range of interested parties to get a balanced perspective.

Chinese housing boom is over 

Our channel checks support the view that the housing boom in mainland China is largely over. Having maintained a high-risk capital structure reliant on continued if not accelerated home price dynamics, Evergrande is a high-profile casualty of a changed dynamic and there will likely be others albeit likely not on its scale.

Evergrande is one of China largest property developers and ranked 4th in terms annual housing production. Whilst by itself Evergrande is not too big to fail, the broader consequences on the housing market, financial institutions and the economy are meaningful, particularly if it leads to the rapid collapse of many other highly leveraged players in the market.

Direct stakeholders include purchasers of unfinished homes, construction workers and building materials suppliers as well as its debt and equity investors. Equity investors and offshore bond holders should prepare for the worst, but they should not be shocked given Evergrande’s precarious financial position has been evident for some time. 

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has warned in the past 2-3 years that it is seeking to address some imbalances in the economy. Whilst part of the motive of the CCP is to curb the influence of large private enterprise and high-profile individuals, there also appears to be a deliberate policy to reign in escalating education and housing costs in an attempt to address low birth rates and stagnating population growth.

Specific to the residential property sector, President Xi Jinping is often quoted saying “houses are built to be inhabited, not for speculation”.

Buoyed by seemingly ever-rising land prices and a constantly growing economy, as highlighted in the chart below, Chinese residential developers have maintained higher financial leverage then their global peers.

Concerned about this dynamic, from a policy perspective, the Chinese Government had been tightening lending conditions for developers for some time – most recently initiating the ‘three-red-lines’ policy[1] introduced in August 2020 which imposes three specific leverage metrics targets on property developers. This tightening of lending conditions has been well telegraphed. 

Indeed, policy tightening is a major contributing factor to the timing of Evergrande’s troubles, but principally because it was already in a self-inflicted precarious financial position as the graph below illustrates.

Global snapshot sample – Publicly-listed residential property development companies

Source: S&P Capital IQ

Not in the Lehman league

We do not believe the challenges facing Chinese developers and their lenders is likely to be a crisis on the magnitude of Lehmans. Whilst there are 'shadowy' recesses in the financial system, there is limited evidence of low doc NINJA (No Income No Job Applicants) type loans that riddled the US banking system in the lead up to the GFC.

Indeed, the Government has deliberately put in measures to forestall such a crisis. Stress testing conducted by sell-side banking analysts generally concurs that the Chinese banking sector should be able to manage various default scenarios for both Evergrande and the Chinese property sector more broadly. The Chinese banking regulator is directing banks to maintain liquidity to other property developers to avoid a broader loss of buyer confidence in developers’ ability to deliver.

Nevertheless, we acknowledge the CCP’s efforts to balance the economy could fail and wider contagion impacts depend on whether Chinese homebuyer confidence diminishes more broadly. This is accentuated by the way in which off-the-plan home buyers make progress payments throughout the construction phase in China, putting more risk on the home buyer when developers fail and are unable to deliver the completed project.

We will not be surprised to see the liquidation or significant restructure of Evergrande’s affairs but do expect it to be executed in an orderly manner, potentially with State-Owned-Enterprises called upon to assume responsibility for completing major works in progress.

Access to foreign capital is likely to be curtailed for some time so much depends on the Chinese banking system’s ability to fill any voids in order to reduce the extent of a housing slow down.

Crucially, the CCP has no motive to undermine the housing market, the populace has most of its wealth invested in residential and, as mentioned at the outset, it is a significant driver of the economy. Hence, we expect the Government will pull levers necessary to stabilise the market.

Residential affordability a global problem

The challenges facing China’s residential market in relation to demographics and affordability are by no means isolated. The collapse of Evergrande places pressure on Chinese policy makers to underpin property values whilst addressing affordability issues. We stress this is a challenge not confined to China as governments and societies around the world also face the challenge of how to manage residential affordability.

In terms of the broader global REIT sector, financial leverage is moderate, debt sources are diversified and debt maturities are well laddered. We see limited risk of a repeat of the GFC liquidity crisis which impacted the REIT sector. Our portfolio remains skewed towards exposures which have sound balance sheets, prudent management teams and healthy operating conditions where landlords continue to have pricing power.


Andrew Parsons is a Co-Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Resolution Capital, and affiliate manager of Pinnacle Investment Management. Pinnacle is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs, and because of that, reliance should not be placed on this information as the basis for making an investment, financial or other decision.

For more articles and papers from Pinnacle Investment Management and affiliate managers, click here.


[1] The three red lines

  1. Liability-to-asset ratio (excluding advance receipts) of less than 70%
  2. Net gearing ratio of less than 100%
  3. Cash-to-short-term debt ratio of more than 1x

If the developers fail to meet one, two or all of the ‘three red lines’, regulators would then place limits on the extent to which they can grow debt.



Debt is the biggest risk on China’s horizon

China’s growth slowdown is underway


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Charlie Munger and stock picks at the Sohn Conference

The Sohn Australia Conference brings together leading fund managers to chose their highest conviction stock in a 10-minute pitch. Here are their 2021 selections with Charlie Munger's wisdom as the star feature.


John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.


Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?


The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.