Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 12

Not all growth is good

This is Part 1 in a three part series on capital allocation and management ability.

Many years ago the world’s wealthiest man Warren Buffett said that growth was not always a good thing. What? Aren’t companies of the western world doggedly pursuing growth? If our economy has two quarters of negative growth, we call it a recession and recessions are bad things. More sales, more profits, more products. It is all about ‘more’.  But growth is not always good. They might not know it but for some investors, growth has destroyed wealth both quickly and permanently.

Remember ABC Learning Centres? April 2006. The shares were trading at more than $8.00 and profits were growing at a fantastic rate - they had risen from about $11 million in 2002 to over $80 million in 2006. The problem was return on equity was declining.

It is return on equity that will help you identify the great companies to safely invest in.  And it is return on equity that will save your portfolio from permanent destruction.

To understand what Warren Buffett was talking about when he said not all growth is good, you need to know something about return on equity.

Imagine you have a business, even a good one. You invested $1 million dollars in it, bought a shop and in the first year, produced a real cash profit after tax of $400,000.  That’s a 40% return. Now suppose another shop came up for sale in another area for $400,000 and you decided to buy it. As it happens you are really good at running the first store you bought but you have found running the second store a little harder. Traveling between them is a challenge and so you bring in a manager for the second store. The result is that after a year of owning the second store it produces a profit of $20,000. Meanwhile the first store produces another $400,000. The second store has generated a return of just 5%. Many business owners – and I know one or two – would say this is still satisfactory, because profits have gone up. In the first year your business made $400,000 and in the second year, profits have gone up to $420,000. Profits of your new ‘group’ grew by 5%.

Thinking about this situation another way reveals what a poor investment the second shop is. You first have to remember that you gave your business more money, so profits should have gone up. A rocking chair to sit in and a bank account are all you need to make profits go up. Invest $1 million in a bank account and then put in another $400,000 the year after and the interest you earn in the second year will be higher than in the first. You have grown the profits and it has been no effort at all.

So when a company increases its profits it is nothing spectacular if the owners have invested more money in the company. This is purchased growth. Shareholders have funded the opportunity for the directors to look good. The situation is even worse if that additional money generates a return that is less impressive than the rate available from a bank account. And if a higher return can be earned for the same risk or the same return for less risk, somewhere else, then the reality is that you don’t want to put more money into the business. You don’t want it to grow. It is better that the $400,000 is taken out of the business, rather than employed to purchase another shop. The $400,000 should be invested elsewhere at a higher rate or even at the same rate in a bank account, which has a lot less risk.

If, each year, you invested the $400,000 from the original shop into a new one that produced a return of 5%, the business would have many shops earning 5%, and each year the business would be worth less and less even though profits would be growing.

Many investors don’t understand this – that there is growth that will destroy wealth. They happily allow the management of a company to keep the money ‘to grow the business’ and willingly accept a low return. That low return is actually costing you money because you could have earned a better return elsewhere. It is called opportunity cost. Investing the money in the business at a low rate of return has cost you the opportunity of earning more or earning the same, but with more safety, elsewhere.

For example, the following table shows that an investor in a company that generates a 5% return on equity and that keeps all the profits for growth rather than paying those profits out as a dividend, will lose half their money.

Table 1: How to lose money despite profits and capitalisation rising

Table 1 shows a company listed on the stock exchange and whose shares are trading on a price earnings ratio of 10 times. The price earnings ratio is simply the share price divided by the earnings. So if the share price is $5 and the earnings are 50 cents, the price earnings ratio will be 10. It means that buyers of the shares are happy to pay 10 times the profits for the company.

In Year 1 when the company earned a profit of $50,000, the stock market was willing to pay 10 times that profit or $500,000 to buy the entire company. Another way of thinking about it is that the stock market thinks the company is worth $500,000. Of course, as we have talked about already, what the stock market thinks the company is worth and what it is actually worth are very often two different things.  Don’t listen to what the stock market thinks.

The company begins Year 1 with $1 million of equity on its balance sheet and in the first year, generates a 5% return on that equity, or $50,000. Management decides that the money is needed to ‘grow’ the business and so no dividend is paid. As you are about to discover, that decision has cost shareholders a small fortune.

By keeping the profits, the equity on the balance sheet grows from $1 million at the start of the year to $1,050,000 at the end. In the second year, the company again earns 5% on the new, larger equity balance. A 5% return on $1,050,000 is a profit of $52,500.

So on the surface things look rosy. I’ll give you a week to think about what the problem is, and in Part 2 of this series next week in Cuffelinks, I’ll show you how shareholders have been dudded by management and company directors.

 

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Capital allocation and management ability – Part 2

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.