Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 12

Not all growth is good

This is Part 1 in a three part series on capital allocation and management ability.

Many years ago the world’s wealthiest man Warren Buffett said that growth was not always a good thing. What? Aren’t companies of the western world doggedly pursuing growth? If our economy has two quarters of negative growth, we call it a recession and recessions are bad things. More sales, more profits, more products. It is all about ‘more’.  But growth is not always good. They might not know it but for some investors, growth has destroyed wealth both quickly and permanently.

Remember ABC Learning Centres? April 2006. The shares were trading at more than $8.00 and profits were growing at a fantastic rate - they had risen from about $11 million in 2002 to over $80 million in 2006. The problem was return on equity was declining.

It is return on equity that will help you identify the great companies to safely invest in.  And it is return on equity that will save your portfolio from permanent destruction.

To understand what Warren Buffett was talking about when he said not all growth is good, you need to know something about return on equity.

Imagine you have a business, even a good one. You invested $1 million dollars in it, bought a shop and in the first year, produced a real cash profit after tax of $400,000.  That’s a 40% return. Now suppose another shop came up for sale in another area for $400,000 and you decided to buy it. As it happens you are really good at running the first store you bought but you have found running the second store a little harder. Traveling between them is a challenge and so you bring in a manager for the second store. The result is that after a year of owning the second store it produces a profit of $20,000. Meanwhile the first store produces another $400,000. The second store has generated a return of just 5%. Many business owners – and I know one or two – would say this is still satisfactory, because profits have gone up. In the first year your business made $400,000 and in the second year, profits have gone up to $420,000. Profits of your new ‘group’ grew by 5%.

Thinking about this situation another way reveals what a poor investment the second shop is. You first have to remember that you gave your business more money, so profits should have gone up. A rocking chair to sit in and a bank account are all you need to make profits go up. Invest $1 million in a bank account and then put in another $400,000 the year after and the interest you earn in the second year will be higher than in the first. You have grown the profits and it has been no effort at all.

So when a company increases its profits it is nothing spectacular if the owners have invested more money in the company. This is purchased growth. Shareholders have funded the opportunity for the directors to look good. The situation is even worse if that additional money generates a return that is less impressive than the rate available from a bank account. And if a higher return can be earned for the same risk or the same return for less risk, somewhere else, then the reality is that you don’t want to put more money into the business. You don’t want it to grow. It is better that the $400,000 is taken out of the business, rather than employed to purchase another shop. The $400,000 should be invested elsewhere at a higher rate or even at the same rate in a bank account, which has a lot less risk.

If, each year, you invested the $400,000 from the original shop into a new one that produced a return of 5%, the business would have many shops earning 5%, and each year the business would be worth less and less even though profits would be growing.

Many investors don’t understand this – that there is growth that will destroy wealth. They happily allow the management of a company to keep the money ‘to grow the business’ and willingly accept a low return. That low return is actually costing you money because you could have earned a better return elsewhere. It is called opportunity cost. Investing the money in the business at a low rate of return has cost you the opportunity of earning more or earning the same, but with more safety, elsewhere.

For example, the following table shows that an investor in a company that generates a 5% return on equity and that keeps all the profits for growth rather than paying those profits out as a dividend, will lose half their money.

Table 1: How to lose money despite profits and capitalisation rising

Table 1 shows a company listed on the stock exchange and whose shares are trading on a price earnings ratio of 10 times. The price earnings ratio is simply the share price divided by the earnings. So if the share price is $5 and the earnings are 50 cents, the price earnings ratio will be 10. It means that buyers of the shares are happy to pay 10 times the profits for the company.

In Year 1 when the company earned a profit of $50,000, the stock market was willing to pay 10 times that profit or $500,000 to buy the entire company. Another way of thinking about it is that the stock market thinks the company is worth $500,000. Of course, as we have talked about already, what the stock market thinks the company is worth and what it is actually worth are very often two different things.  Don’t listen to what the stock market thinks.

The company begins Year 1 with $1 million of equity on its balance sheet and in the first year, generates a 5% return on that equity, or $50,000. Management decides that the money is needed to ‘grow’ the business and so no dividend is paid. As you are about to discover, that decision has cost shareholders a small fortune.

By keeping the profits, the equity on the balance sheet grows from $1 million at the start of the year to $1,050,000 at the end. In the second year, the company again earns 5% on the new, larger equity balance. A 5% return on $1,050,000 is a profit of $52,500.

So on the surface things look rosy. I’ll give you a week to think about what the problem is, and in Part 2 of this series next week in Cuffelinks, I’ll show you how shareholders have been dudded by management and company directors.

 

Roger Montgomery is the founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund.

 

  •   26 April 2013
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Capital allocation and management ability – Part 2

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Retirement

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

The ASX is full of broken blue chips

Investing in the ASX 20 or 200 requires vigilance. Blue chips aren’t immune to failure, and the old belief that you can simply hold them forever is outdated. 

Shares

Buying Guzman y Gomez, and not just for the burritos

Adding high-quality compounders at attractive valuations is difficult in an efficient market. However, during the volatile FY25 reporting season, an opportunity arose to increase a position in Mexican fast-food chain GYG.

Investment strategies

Factor investing and how to use ETFs to your advantage

Factor-based ETFs are bridging the gap between active and passive investing, giving investors low-cost access to proven drivers of long-term returns such as quality, value, momentum and dividend yield. 

Strategy

Engineers vs lawyers: the US-China divide that will shape this century

In Breakneck, Dan Wang contrasts China’s “engineering state” with America’s “lawyerly society,” showing how these mindsets drive innovation, dysfunction, and reshape global power amid rising rivalry. 

Retirement

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.