Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 282

Conexus sees conflict in fund manager awards

Editor's introduction

Colin Tate is CEO of Conexus Financial, publisher of several trade titles. We admire that he has taken a stance against fund manager awards where conflicts arise. As he says, the awards encourage short termism and the outcome may be influenced by contributions to the revenues of various agencies.

Cuffelinks recently discussed with a major research house the possibility of a new award for the best Listed Investment Company (LIC) and/or Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). We soon realised the dilemma this would create. Any event needs sponsorship, and obviously, LIC and ETF providers would be prime candidates to support the event. But they are unlikely to sponsor an award to one of their competitors, placing the organisers in a compromised position. Some of these award nights have so many prizes, it feels like there's something for everyone.

We reproduce Colin's letter to his subscribers below.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professional standards in the advice and wealth management industry are shifting quickly. As a publisher and a thought leader, it’s important to be ahead of the curve at all times, which is why we’ve made the decision to discontinue our successful Professional Planner/Zenith Fund Awards.

This decision is in no way intended to take away from the efforts and successes of the winners and finalists.

In recent years, I’ve been struggling to see how sell-side awards ceremonies add any value to the client, not to mention what this backslapping looks like to people outside the industry. By people outside the industry, I mean those paying a percentage of their savings for returns to afford a better lifestyle and a dignified retirement.

The Hayne Royal Commission hearings and interim findings have already called out many conflicts of interests, but many more will be called out in coming months and the industry needs to make some of these calls itself to move forward. I think the fund ratings process is one of the areas that needs to change, which is why – despite the revenue opportunity for our company – we are walking away from the awards.

Conexus Financial, the privately-owned publisher of Professional Planner, holds 20 events across its three titles, which also include Investment Magazine and Top1000funds.com

The fund awards are the only sell-side event in our stable. The event is inconsistent with our mission to push the industry to lift professional standards and, ultimately, further the interests of the member and the end investor.

By promoting the awards, we are inadvertently promoting short-term behaviour, which is not what investment or super should be about. Firstly, from a portfolio construction point of view, there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that it’s asset allocation, not fund manager selection, that makes the difference to investor returns over the long term.

Further, the role of fund ratings and research houses in the ecosystem is heavily conflicted and, indeed, is hampering the progress of the industry towards professionalism. Requiring fund managers to pay for ratings makes the system favour larger managers with multiple funds because they contribute more to the revenues of the ratings agencies. It’s these types of arrangements that end up creating worse – not better – outcomes for clients.

There are too many agents in this industry already. We need to do much better for the end customer in this regard.

Following the Royal Commission’s final report in February, serious reform will be on the way and there will be no appetite for the financial industry to be congratulating itself, so we are moving now to set the right tone.

Conexus Financial, through Professional Planner and its other mastheads, has core values of making a quantifiable difference, promoting inclusion for women and minorities, and championing diversity in general. Our goal is to encourage growth within the industry, while also promoting more participation in clear and sustainable investment outcomes for individuals and society. In every venture, and in every area, our efforts must reflect these values to remain current, contemporary and relevant.

We thank S&P and subsequently Zenith, along with all our partners, for their past support.

Colin Tate

Chief Executive

Conexus Financial

 

  •   28 November 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The most vital question ever put to me as a portfolio adviser

2020 Morningstar Fund Manager of the Year awards

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.