Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 147

Real estate outlook: positive returns expected in challenging year

Now we’re into 2016, investors are asking the question, “Are real estate markets peaking, or is there more upside in this cycle?"

Since the lows of the GFC, non-residential real estate and listed A-REITs (Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts) have delivered positive risk-adjusted returns. In fact, A-REITs have been the standout performer over the past five years, taking the title as the best performer in four of the past five years.

Over the five years to 31 December 2015, A-REITs delivered a total return of 15.3% per annum, more than double the 6.7% per annum from equities and 6.6% from bonds, and higher than the 10.7% from direct property, as shown in Figure 1. The one-year 2015 performance is also strong.

It is not surprising that investors are increasingly asking, “Is this as good as it gets?”

We believe the strong performance of both listed and unlisted real estate sectors won’t be repeated to the same extent in 2016, but we also believe that a major downturn is unlikely. The one caveat is if the volatility and negative investor sentiment that hit global financial markets in the first two months of this year returns, leading to a major tightening of liquidity in financial markets, then real estate, whether listed or unlisted, won’t be immune to the fallout. Having said that, prime real estate with secure income and strong A-REITs with quality assets and management will look relatively attractive.

Foreign investment set to continue

International capital was a feature of the Australian market in 2015 and will be again in 2016. According to Cushman & Wakefield, non-residential transactions topped $29.9 billion, with foreign investors accounting for just over 50% of total transactions by value, as shown in Figure 2.

Foreign investment activity in non-residential real estate (and also the listed A-REIT sector) has been growing steadily over the past few years driven by a confluence of factors, including:

  • global investors chasing Australia’s relatively high yields
  • Australia’s transparent and relatively stable market
  • growth in Asia-Pacific focused real estate funds which are allocating capital to Australia as part of their regional mandates
  • China’s insurance companies targeting real estate investments, together with a relaxation of restrictions on their international investing activities
  • the decline in the Australian dollar.

A challenging year to deploy capital

International investors will continue to be active buyers in Australia particularly for prime office, retail and industrial assets, making it difficult for local investors who typically have a higher cost of capital to compete. We also see the listed A-REIT market as being attractive to foreign capital in 2016 for much the same reasons as direct real estate.

We are now seven years into the up-cycle, and we see less upside to many markets than we have in recent years. Valuations in the direct market are not cheap enough in many instances to reflect the risk we see from the macroeconomic headwinds.

We expect steady real estate demand across most non-residential sectors with the exception of Perth and to a lesser extent Brisbane, which are affected by the resource sector downturn. Notwithstanding cap rates are nearing pre-GFC lows, given the weight of money chasing real estate assets, capital values for quality assets (i.e. those with strong covenants, long leases and quality locations) will rise in the year ahead.

The availability of equity from domestic and international investors and debt from lenders will be critical. Should one or both of these sources of capital contract due to concerns about economic or capital market conditions, it could place pressure on values, especially for secondary assets unless there is a clear strategy for value creation.

The challenge in this environment is to avoid broad ‘beta’ plays on real estate (investing in the hope that the market uplift will drive asset performance) or simply taking greater risk in search of higher (yield) returns.

Given we are close to full valuations in some markets, earnings growth rather than yield compression will be the key driver of value creation going forward.

Investors seeking higher returns by taking on more risk may not be rewarded. Instead investors should focus on value-creation through active management of assets via releasing, repositioning or refurbishing. Now is not the time to stretch on price or overcommit to acquisition-driven strategies. Be disciplined and be patient. Sometimes being defensive, including raising some extra cash, is actually an offensive move as it creates optionality when the future appears most uncertain. In our view, the next 12 to 24 months could be one of those times.

We continue to believe that real estate related social infrastructure (childcare, seniors living, healthcare and student housing) will offer attractive investment returns in the coming year. The demographic drivers and a shortage of quality accommodation in these sectors will see investors increasingly look at these investments as a legitimate part of a real estate portfolio.

A-REITs still attractive as a defensive play

The A-REIT sector has generally been disciplined in its capital allocation, including:

  • focusing on core investment strategies and not undertaking risky global expansion plays like it did prior to the GFC
  • maintaining relatively low leverage
  • employing sustainable pay-out ratios
  • growing earnings through active asset management.

We expect A-REITs to deliver a total return of circa 10% in 2016, underpinned by a dividend yield of 5%. A-REITs present well on yield relative to the cash rate and other ASX-listed equity sectors and global REIT markets and should continue to be well supported given their relatively visible earnings and distribution growth.

To access the Folkestone 2016 Real Estate Outlook paper, please click here.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone (ASX:FLK). This article is general information and does not address the specific investment needs of any individual.

 

3 Comments
Adrian Harrington
March 21, 2016

Thanks Gary for the question. Rising investment in Australia by Chinese investors is part of a global trend. Capital flows from China to Australia are being driven by our new bi-lateral trade agreement, growing numbers of Chinese tourists, students, and immigrants.
There are four key areas where Chinese investment will continue into Australia:
1. agriculture - this is being driven by China's desire to have access to foodchain;
2. hotels - Chinese are now the biggest source of inbound tourism to Australia taking over from NZ. Chinese travel companies are looking to become globally integrated and this means owning hotels in key destinations including Australia.
3. office buildings - Chinese insurance companies have only been allowed to invest in real estate since 2009. Further deregulation in 2012 allowed investment in overseas markets
and today overseas investment can be up to 15% of total asset value. Current holdings of investment properties for all Chinese insurance companies totals less than 1.0%. According to Cushman & Wakefield, the top five insurers have an allocation of under 2%
underscoring the potential for rapid growth. Most US, UK and Australian insurance companies will have around 10% allocated to real estate so they are underweight. Hence why China insurance companies like CIC, Ping Am and Fosun have been, and will continue to be active buyers of real estate in global gateway cities including Sydney and Melbourne office markets
4. residential - both developers and investors continue to come to Australia. Our residential markets are attractive for a variety of reasons. This amount of capital flowing in will ebb and flow depending on conditions in China and Australia at certain times in the cycle. However, we see the Chinese as being key players long-term in our residential market.

As to which sectors are most at risk, it is clearly residential given the recent strong flows and the investor activity. A number of smaller Chinese developers have paid too much for sites and we are hearing them struggling with rising construction costs to make things stack up. Investment into the other sectors is being driven by long-term decisions so they are mostly adopting a buy and hold strategy.

As to how much - the impact is hard to quantify. I have yet to see anyone really put a hard number on this despite reports produced by CBRE - Chinese Capital - is it here to stay?, KPMG/Knight Frank - Demystifying Chinese Investment in Australia, Knight Frank - Chinese Outward Real Estate Investment Globally and into Australia and Credit Suisse - Australia: China's Extended Property Boom. I have copies of all four reports if you'd like them.

Warren Bird
March 20, 2016

Why does this matter? Speculation about where markets might go is NOT what I read Cuffelinks for.

Gary M
March 19, 2016

Adrian, I think the biggest threat to many sectors of real estate is the potential for limits to capital outflow from China. Assuming this happened, which sectors do you think would be hardest hit, and by how much?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Real estate social infrastructure coming of age

State of play in listed real estate

A guide to real estate investing strategies

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.