Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 173

How rebalancing can help your portfolio

As with most things in life, it is the less exciting aspects of managing a portfolio such as rebalancing that turn out to be the most important. So what does rebalancing mean? Quite simply, it’s repositioning your portfolio back to target weights.

This is the first in a series exploring different methods to rebalance a portfolio. There are plenty of ways to do this, but here we start with the simplest method – calendar rebalancing, which means rebalancing over a set period of time, and it can be done at different time intervals.

'Set and forget' performs worst in this example 

Assume we started in August 1996 with $100,000 to invest and run the analysis for 20 years. We chose four stocks – BHP Billiton (BHP), Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA), National Australia Bank (NAB) and Woolworths (WOW). We set our target weights at 30%, 20%, 20% and 30% respectively. This is not about portfolio construction, so for illustrative purposes four stocks is enough.

We consider four scenarios; ‘Set and forget’, monthly, semi-annual and annual rebalancing. We rebalance our portfolio irrespective of what the stock price has done, what we think (or hope) it’s going to do and simply buy or sell shares at the calendar end of the period to take our target weights back to our starting position. With calendar rebalancing, there is no emotion.

‘Set and forget’ lets us down here with a final portfolio value of $523,000.



Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016 (Click to enlarge)

However, simply rebalancing the portfolio (albeit a very simple portfolio) monthly gives a final portfolio value of $587,000, semi-annual rebalancing gives a final portfolio of $545,000, and for this portfolio, annual rebalancing adds no value. The total returns for these portfolios are shown in the table below:


The performance difference from rebalancing is significant, particularly over a long period of time. Why? Let’s look at two of these scenarios and the weights through time to show the story.

‘Set and forget’ weights through time impact performance


Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

‘Monthly rebalancing’ holds our exposures largely constant through time


Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Looking at the weights through time we see that, should we just set and forget, Woolworths becomes a large position in our portfolio. In fact, our dollar holding in the set and forget portfolio increases to over 50% of our portfolio.

In our monthly rebalancing, we begin to see why rebalancing performs the best for a concentrated stock portfolio. By design, we buy stocks when they have fallen below our target weight and we sell stocks when they have risen above our target weight. We are implementing the ‘trader’s catch-cry’ of buying low and selling high simply because we have held true to the weights we started with.

The second reason why rebalancing helps is it is the simplest method of portfolio risk control. Consider WOW: in the set and forget portfolio, we have let our best performers run, which is a very tempting way to manage a stock portfolio. But looking at what happens when WOW reprices reveals the other side of why a rebalancing regime helps overall portfolio performance.

By 2015, in the ‘set and forget’ portfolio the dollar holdings in WOW has risen to approximately $400,000, as opposed to around $200,000 in the monthly rebalanced portfolio


Source: FactSet, Owners Advisory, September 2016

Woolworths fell 9.5% on 26 to 27 February 2015, costing us 4.5% in the entire portfolio on the day ($30,000 in dollar terms). However, in those portfolios where we have controlled our total exposure to a single stock, we see that while we still suffer a loss, it is only 2.5% of the portfolio’s value ($18,000 in dollar terms).

Simply having the discipline to hold shares at predetermined weights can go a long way to adding value to the total portfolio’s returns over the long term.

In the next instalment, we look at using the percentage deviation from target weights as our rebalancing trigger to see whether we can improve our overall portfolio performance by being just a little bit more sophisticated.


Leah Kelly is Portfolio Manager at Owners Advisory. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

Errol Davey
August 18, 2019

The figures would be vastly different if the 20 year period was from 1999 to 2019, WOW is now $36.00.

Ramon Vasquez
February 12, 2018

Hi Everyone ...

Thanks very much for the article , especially as l have been to much of a trader ,but am now approaching retirement age and need to change my style accordingly .

Would it be possible to make a comparison similar to the outline and some querical objections , against an EQUALLY WEIGHTED portfolio of the same four stocks , l wonder ???

Best wishes , Ramon Vasquez .

September 17, 2016

Rebalancing always baffled me,the high costs of churning as others have pointed out.Shooting the horse that wins the race to feed it to the ones that lost,weird.Should we not just let winners run?

I would have no problem with a concentrated portfolio,looking for the end result and the magic of compounding.The dividends they would bring in after retirement.

Have dividends been reinvested as the total seems a bit low.If they have then CBA would now be far ahead of all the rest of that portfolio,probably with a good performance from WOW.

I remember reading the 'Top stocks ' book in the early 1990s,I forget the name of the guy that writes it.Of 10 stocks I think 3 of them went bust,but the silly thing was,he had sold out of Westfield.Westfield had swamped the rest of the portfolio and was worth more than all the other shares put together.Preaching the necessity to rebalance so the portfolio was not concentrated.

I would what Frank Lowy's answer would be if somebody told him he was silly for not rebalancing,just a thought.

September 16, 2016

Furthermore, were trading costs included? I think they would have been relatively significant to the monthly re-balancing portfolio.

September 15, 2016

Hi - thanks for your question. I will be looking at that in part 3 as yes - it certainly changes the numbers reported.

September 15, 2016

Hi Leah, capital gains tax (particularly for individuals but also for super) would be a major source of performance leakage from this strategy, have you looked at after-tax performance of rebalancing vs set and forget? Thanks


Leave a Comment:



The asymmetric value of gold for Australian investors

ETFs and the art of portfolio rebalancing

There's nothing sleepy about Rip Van Winkle indexing


Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Five stock recoveries not hanging on COVID predictions

The focus on predicting the recovery from the pandemic is the wrong emphasis. Better to identify great companies benefitting from market changes over a three- to five-year horizon with or without COVID.

Peak to peak, which LIC managers performed during COVID?

A comprehensive review of dozens of LICs shows how they performed in the crucial 'peak to peak' of COVID. This 14 months tested the mettle and strategies of a sector often under fire, with many strong results.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Blink and you missed a seismic shift in these stocks

Blink and it happened. If announcements in this sector were made by a producer of iron ore, gas, copper or some new tech, the news would have been splashed across the front pages. Have we witnessed a major change?

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Latest Updates


Platinum’s four guiding investment principles

Buying mispriced stocks is often uncomfortable when companies are outside the spotlight and markets are driven by emotions. And it's inescapable that the price paid ultimately determines the end result.


Andrew Lockhart on corporate loans as an income alternative

Loans to corporates were the traditional domain of banks, but as investors look for income alternatives to term deposits, funds have combined hundreds of loans into a single structure to create a diversified investment.


10 things I learned in my faux-retirement

Pre-retirees should ‘trial run’ their retirements. All those things you want to do - play golf, time with the family, a hobby, write a book - might not be so appealing in reality, but you might discover other benefits.


Achieving a sufficient retirement income portfolio

Retirees require a reliable income stream to replace the wages they received when they were working and should focus on the dollar income generated over time rather than the headline yield percentage.

'Wealth of Experience' podcast and ASA webinar on ETFs v LICs

Peter reveals some top stock picks with an emphasis on long-term assets like Sydney Airport, Graham discusses spending in retirement and valuing assets, the key to Amazon, guest Andrew Lockhart and plenty more.


Lucy Turnbull’s three lessons on leadership and successful careers

From promoting women to boost culture to taking opportunities as they arise, Lucy Turnbull AO says markets should not drive decision-making and leaders must live and breathe the company's mission and values.


Are concerns about inflation inflated?

While REITs and some value stocks are considered 'inflation-sensitive' assets, the data provide little support that they are good inflation hedges, and energy stocks and commodities are too volatile. So what works?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.