Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 194

Reporting season gives reasons for optimism

At a headline level, the recent reporting season provided several reasons for optimism with Corporate Australia beginning to successfully adjust to the more subdued growth environment.

At first glance, the results do not deviate too far from historical norms: 22% of companies upgraded while 32% downgraded which, while better than last season, is broadly in line with the long-term average. More telling is the change in aggregate expected earnings for the S&P/ASX 200 in FY17, which increased by 1.6% as a result of reporting season. While this may not seem like much, as the following chart shows, it is the best result since February 2010 and stands in stark contrast to the average downgrade of -0.9% that follows reporting seasons.

S&P/ASX 200 EPS upgrades / downgrades for FY17

The upshot is that the S&P/ASX200 remains on track for its first financial year of positive EPS growth since FY14, with upgraded expectations now at 16% growth for FY17, following -13% in FY16 and -3% in FY15. This is a remarkable turnaround, given the market expected 8% EPS growth for FY17 as recently as August 2016.

Resources resurgent

The caveat to all this positive momentum and earnings upside is that it was largely the result of a resurgent resource sector. Soft data at the end of 2015 saw the Chinese authorities administer an economic adrenaline shot via a credit injection and a renewed focus on infrastructure spending in early 2016. The result was an uptick in demand for resources which, in conjunction with supply disruption and discipline in iron ore and coal, have seen commodity prices soar. This, in turn, has seen a surge in cash flow and earnings for the miners, with their operational leverage enhanced by several lean years of cost cutting and, in some cases, near-death experiences. The turnaround has been spectacular, with cash flow funding debt reduction, dividends and buybacks, and share prices have surged accordingly.

We would caution against excessive exuberance regarding the turnaround in earnings; it is not broad-based and, while resource companies have been adept in controlling costs and capex, it has been the exogenous factor of commodity prices which has driven their success.

Industrials less spectacular, but significant

Beneath the turnaround in resources there is something perhaps more surprising and potentially more significant: the market ex-resources (ie the industrials) did not, on the whole, disappoint.

The S&P/ASX 200, once commodity companies are removed, saw earnings expectations increase by +0.2%. Again, this does not seem much, but needs to be considered within the context of the average historical downgrade of -0.6% and the fact this is the best result since 2010.

S&P/ASX 200 ex commodities EPS upgrades / downgrades for FY17

Cost discipline behind earnings upgrades

Earnings quality among the industrials was mixed. For all the nascent signs of optimism in this reporting season, we remain in an environment of muted revenue growth for most industries. Where companies beat expectations in this season, it was often a result of delivering surprisingly high levels of cost reduction.

Qantas provides a salient example. While it reported a 7.5% contraction in underlying pretax earnings due to the combination of softer domestic demand for much of 2016 and an increase in international industry capacity, the stock actually did well, as earnings were $25 million ahead of the market consensus. Cost discipline has allowed QAN’s earnings to be more resilient than the market expected and enabled them to continue to return capital to shareholders.

Declining earnings quality drives underperformers

If cost discipline drove earnings upgrades and outperformance within industrials, any signs of declining cash flow or rising capital intensity drove the season’s underperformers. There was an uptick in companies relying on a range of accounting measures in order to hit earnings targets, such as the inclusion of one-off profits, release of provisions, changes to depreciation and amortization policies, or changes in treatment of working capital. It is possible to discern, in the underperformance of previous market favourites who showed signs of deteriorating quality, a growing focus on cash flow, rather than accounting earnings.

This highlights the need for investors to go beyond headline reported earnings to understand the underlying profitability of the business. Ultimately, accounting earnings can be manipulated, to an extent. Cash flow cannot, and often offers a far more accurate gauge of a company’s true health and fortune.

Look for strong strategy and ability to execute

All in all, Corporate Australia remains in reasonable health, underpinned by strong cost discipline. Management remained focused on capital management in preference to further capex and increased dividends and buy backs should serve to help support the equity market.

We remain mindful that we are in an environment of significant industrial disruption due to globalisation, developments in technology and changes in regulation. The combination of low revenue and industrial disruption sorts the wheat from the chaff in management quality. Only those companies with a strong strategy and the ability to execute will ultimately thrive. This is where we deploy our team and company-level insight to greatest effect, by finding the companies who are equipped to traverse today’s challenging environment.


Crispin Murray is Head of Equities at BT Investment Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This information is general only and does not take into account the personal circumstances or financial objectives of any reader.


How to handle the riskiest company results in history

To zig or to zag?

Reporting season was not all doom and gloom


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.