Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 150

The resilience of airports

Airports have become important assets in most infrastructure funds, and investors should consider whether the fundamentals will ensure the strong past performance is likely to continue in the future.

Since the development of commercial aviation during the post-World War II era, passenger volumes at major commercial airports have grown at multiples of GDP over any medium-term period. This growth reflects many underlying factors including increasing wealth, real reductions in the cost of air travel, developments in aircraft technology and improvements in international airspace regulation.

Global passenger growth is illustrated in Chart 1 below, showing the fairly consistent growth of airline passenger volumes since the mid-1960’s and more recently, this measure has grown by 62% over the last 10 years [Airbus, 2015]. More importantly, the chart illustrates the resilience of air travel to external shocks and the speed of the recovery to a long term upward trajectory.

Chart 1: Air travel has proved to be resilient to external shocks


Source: ICAO, Airbus, GMF 2015. RPK = Revenue Passenger Kilometre

High quality airports benefit from a near monopoly stream of passengers from which they are able to generate both aeronautical and commercial revenues. Regulation is structured to allow the aeronautical operations (including passenger, landing and ancillary fees) to earn returns in line with the cost of capital, whilst there are typically no restrictions placed on the returns that can be generated from non-aeronautical operations, such as retail, parking and commercial property.

Stock example: Aeroports de Paris (ADP)

ADP is the owner and operator of the Paris airport system. This includes both the Charles de Gaulle and Orly Airports. In 2014 these airports handled 92.7 million passengers, making it the second largest system in Europe after London.

Key points on Paris airports:

  • Passenger traffic at the Paris airports was up 3.0% over 2015
  • This was despite the shock of Paris seeing its second terrorist attack in November 2015
  • Chart 2 below shows the very material impact of the terror attacks in November 2015 (with drops of around 4% in traffic for November and December)
  • However, by January 2016 passenger traffic had recovered back to 0.9%, with Air France and ADP both reporting that volumes are back to usual
  • This is a clear demonstration of the resilience of airports and the ability to bounce back from short-term passenger shocks

Stock example: Sydney Airport (SYD)

SYD is owner and operator of the Sydney domestic and international airport. In 2015 SYD handled approximately 40 million passengers. The long term resilience is equally evident with SYD as illustrated in Chart 3 below.

Key points on Sydney Airport:

  • The notable external shock within the Australian context was the collapse of Ansett Australia in 2001. Ansett was Australia’s second largest domestic airline.
  • The rising middle class, particularly in Asia has been contributing to strong passenger growth

In summary, airports form a core part of Magellan’s definition of infrastructure and have, over time, delivered robust financial performance and generated healthy returns for investors. We believe that airports remain a global growth sector and offer an attractive balance of regulated and competitive earnings potential.

 

Gerald Stack is Head of Investments and Portfolio Manager of the Magellan Infrastructure Fund. He is also Chairman of the Investment Committee and has extensive experience in the management of listed and unlisted debt, equity and hybrid assets on a global basis. This material is for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

 

3 Comments
Frank Casarotti
April 11, 2016

Vishal – thank you for your question.

Magellan is very comfortable with the level of debt held by the airports we are invested in. In fact, the debt level is generally less than what it was a decade ago.

Of the airports in our portfolio, the current average debt as measured by Net Debt to Enterprise Value is 23% (compared to 33% across the entire portfolio) with an average Debt Service Cover Ratio i.e.( Revenue – Operating Costs)/Interest Costs of 9.6. That means they are producing almost 10 times as much operating cash flow as they need to meet their annual interest costs.

While airports are more risky than some other sectors in which we invest such as regulated utilities, their earnings have shown to be very resilient to shocks such as 9/11 and the GFC.

Vishal Teckchandani
April 08, 2016

Great article Gerald. One question though, what's your view on the level of debt airports generally hold?

Gary M
April 08, 2016

I would challenge the central claim that airport traffic volumes are “resilient to external shocks” because the charts demonstrate the opposite. The charts look exactly like real GDP charts – with the same drawdowns at the same times – ie they are a good proxy for economic activity – ie cyclical – the opposite of resilience. This makes sense because 2/3 of economic activity is household spending and air travel is discretionary and falls in economic recessions – same with business travel. But the claim of resilience is the essence of their case for owning them.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.