Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 150

The resilience of airports

Airports have become important assets in most infrastructure funds, and investors should consider whether the fundamentals will ensure the strong past performance is likely to continue in the future.

Since the development of commercial aviation during the post-World War II era, passenger volumes at major commercial airports have grown at multiples of GDP over any medium-term period. This growth reflects many underlying factors including increasing wealth, real reductions in the cost of air travel, developments in aircraft technology and improvements in international airspace regulation.

Global passenger growth is illustrated in Chart 1 below, showing the fairly consistent growth of airline passenger volumes since the mid-1960’s and more recently, this measure has grown by 62% over the last 10 years [Airbus, 2015]. More importantly, the chart illustrates the resilience of air travel to external shocks and the speed of the recovery to a long term upward trajectory.

Chart 1: Air travel has proved to be resilient to external shocks


Source: ICAO, Airbus, GMF 2015. RPK = Revenue Passenger Kilometre

High quality airports benefit from a near monopoly stream of passengers from which they are able to generate both aeronautical and commercial revenues. Regulation is structured to allow the aeronautical operations (including passenger, landing and ancillary fees) to earn returns in line with the cost of capital, whilst there are typically no restrictions placed on the returns that can be generated from non-aeronautical operations, such as retail, parking and commercial property.

Stock example: Aeroports de Paris (ADP)

ADP is the owner and operator of the Paris airport system. This includes both the Charles de Gaulle and Orly Airports. In 2014 these airports handled 92.7 million passengers, making it the second largest system in Europe after London.

Key points on Paris airports:

  • Passenger traffic at the Paris airports was up 3.0% over 2015
  • This was despite the shock of Paris seeing its second terrorist attack in November 2015
  • Chart 2 below shows the very material impact of the terror attacks in November 2015 (with drops of around 4% in traffic for November and December)
  • However, by January 2016 passenger traffic had recovered back to 0.9%, with Air France and ADP both reporting that volumes are back to usual
  • This is a clear demonstration of the resilience of airports and the ability to bounce back from short-term passenger shocks

Stock example: Sydney Airport (SYD)

SYD is owner and operator of the Sydney domestic and international airport. In 2015 SYD handled approximately 40 million passengers. The long term resilience is equally evident with SYD as illustrated in Chart 3 below.

Key points on Sydney Airport:

  • The notable external shock within the Australian context was the collapse of Ansett Australia in 2001. Ansett was Australia’s second largest domestic airline.
  • The rising middle class, particularly in Asia has been contributing to strong passenger growth

In summary, airports form a core part of Magellan’s definition of infrastructure and have, over time, delivered robust financial performance and generated healthy returns for investors. We believe that airports remain a global growth sector and offer an attractive balance of regulated and competitive earnings potential.

 

Gerald Stack is Head of Investments and Portfolio Manager of the Magellan Infrastructure Fund. He is also Chairman of the Investment Committee and has extensive experience in the management of listed and unlisted debt, equity and hybrid assets on a global basis. This material is for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

 

  •   7 April 2016
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
Gary M
April 08, 2016

I would challenge the central claim that airport traffic volumes are “resilient to external shocks” because the charts demonstrate the opposite. The charts look exactly like real GDP charts – with the same drawdowns at the same times – ie they are a good proxy for economic activity – ie cyclical – the opposite of resilience. This makes sense because 2/3 of economic activity is household spending and air travel is discretionary and falls in economic recessions – same with business travel. But the claim of resilience is the essence of their case for owning them.

Vishal Teckchandani
April 08, 2016

Great article Gerald. One question though, what's your view on the level of debt airports generally hold?

Frank Casarotti
April 11, 2016

Vishal – thank you for your question.

Magellan is very comfortable with the level of debt held by the airports we are invested in. In fact, the debt level is generally less than what it was a decade ago.

Of the airports in our portfolio, the current average debt as measured by Net Debt to Enterprise Value is 23% (compared to 33% across the entire portfolio) with an average Debt Service Cover Ratio i.e.( Revenue – Operating Costs)/Interest Costs of 9.6. That means they are producing almost 10 times as much operating cash flow as they need to meet their annual interest costs.

While airports are more risky than some other sectors in which we invest such as regulated utilities, their earnings have shown to be very resilient to shocks such as 9/11 and the GFC.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why airport stocks deserve a place in long-term portfolios

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.