Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 271

Retail investors can invest like institutions

“An organization's ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.” – Jack Welch

The way big institutional investors invest money has changed over the past 50 years. In the 1960s and 1970s, investors didn’t really distinguish between the sources of portfolio return, with active investing the predominant way of managing long-term portfolios. Then in the 1980s and 1990s, finance research underpinned the adoption of passive investing as an alternative basis for implementation. That involves investors capturing market beta efficiently through low-cost index investing, with a portion (perhaps half) remaining actively managed.

In the 2000s, a third component called factor investing (or smart beta) was introduced. It lies somewhere between passive and active investing and attempts to generate alpha (i.e. returns above index) in a systematic way by exploiting factors such as value, quality, small size or low volatility.

What might be considered a 'state-of-the art' institutional approach at the moment is approximately 50% in low-cost beta and 25% each in factor-based investing and highly concentrated active portfolios (see graphic below).

Source: MSCI

Rebalancing plays a key role

Such an approach minimises the chances of underperforming a benchmark after fees, whilst still striving for alpha (outperforming the market).

When asset allocations deviate too far from strategic benchmark weights, many institutional investors choose to bring them back into line through a process of passive rebalancing, regularly trimming the weights of what has outperformed and increasing the weights of what has underperformed (i.e. selling high and buying low in a systematic way). Such an approach has typically produced better results than market strategists making big-picture tactical asset allocation (TAA) calls.

In the field of factor-based investing, many different factors have been tried. Besides producing the market-cap-weighted MSCI World index, the MSCI organisation (and others) also produces several factor-based World indexes, including an equal-weighted one. Each factor has certain advantages but invariably outperforms at certain times and underperforms at other times.

The chart below shows the performance of each factor relative to the standard MSCI World benchmark. Although each one has generated alpha over the long term, there is volatility along the way.

The rise of multi-factor models

What has emerged is a trend towards multi-factor models that blend the various factors, smoothing out the alpha volatility because the correlation between them is low.

MSCI has blended four factors (Value, Size, Momentum and Quality) into its MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor (DMF) Index. They impose additional risk controls around country and sector weights, and exposures to growth, liquidity and volatility. The end result is something that mitigates shorter-term cyclicality, while maintaining long-term potential for outperformance (see chart below).

Source: MSCI

These strategies are available to the average investor, not just to institutions. MSCI licenses their indexes to ETF providers who track them. iShares has an ETF version of the multi-factor World index mentioned above. There is an Australian-listed version, the iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor ETF (WDMF.AXW), as well as a US-listed version (ACWF.ARC).

They also have an equivalent multi-factor ETF for Australian equities, the iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (AUMF.AXW), and one for Emerging Markets equities, the iShares Edge MSCI Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (EMGF.BZX) listed in the US. There is also an Australian-listed version called the VanEck Vectors MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMKT.AXW). The MSCI indexes underlying these ETFs have a demonstrated history of outperforming their respective market-cap-weighted benchmarks over the long term.

A wide range of alternatives for retail investors

Other ETF providers such as Vanguard, BetaShares and State Street also offer factor-based ETFs listed on the ASX (a list of ETFs can be found in the ASX report on this link in Cuffelinks).

Lessons learned by big institutional investors over the decades (often learned the hard way) are of relevance to the average investor. Investment solutions that were once only available to the big end of town are now available to anyone willing to learn the same lessons.

 

Marcus Tuck is Head of Equities Research at Mason Stevens. This article is general advice only and does not take into consideration any personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs and should not be relied upon as personal advice.

  •   11 September 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

It pays to look under the hood of ETFs

What is smart beta and why is it growing in popularity?

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Latest Updates

Shares

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Superannuation

When you can withdraw your super

You can’t freely withdraw your super before 65. You need to meet certain legal conditions tied to your age, whether you’ve retired, or if you're using a transition to retirement option. 

Retirement

A national guide to concession entitlements

Navigating retirement concessions is unnecessarily complex. This outlines a new project to help older Australians find what they’re entitled to - quickly, clearly, and with less stress. 

Property

The psychology of REIT investing

Market shocks and rallies test every investor’s resolve. This explores practical strategies to stay grounded - resisting panic in downturns and FOMO in booms - while focusing on long-term returns. 

Fixed interest

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Bonds have had a tough few years and many investors are turning to other assets to diversify their portfolios. However, bonds can still play a valuable role as a source of income and risk mitigation.

Strategy

Is it time to fire the consultants?

The NSW government is cutting the use of consultants. Universities have also been criticized for relying on consultants as cover for restructuring plans. But are consultants really the problem they're made out to be?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.