Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 271

Retail investors can invest like institutions

“An organization's ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.” – Jack Welch

The way big institutional investors invest money has changed over the past 50 years. In the 1960s and 1970s, investors didn’t really distinguish between the sources of portfolio return, with active investing the predominant way of managing long-term portfolios. Then in the 1980s and 1990s, finance research underpinned the adoption of passive investing as an alternative basis for implementation. That involves investors capturing market beta efficiently through low-cost index investing, with a portion (perhaps half) remaining actively managed.

In the 2000s, a third component called factor investing (or smart beta) was introduced. It lies somewhere between passive and active investing and attempts to generate alpha (i.e. returns above index) in a systematic way by exploiting factors such as value, quality, small size or low volatility.

What might be considered a 'state-of-the art' institutional approach at the moment is approximately 50% in low-cost beta and 25% each in factor-based investing and highly concentrated active portfolios (see graphic below).

Source: MSCI

Rebalancing plays a key role

Such an approach minimises the chances of underperforming a benchmark after fees, whilst still striving for alpha (outperforming the market).

When asset allocations deviate too far from strategic benchmark weights, many institutional investors choose to bring them back into line through a process of passive rebalancing, regularly trimming the weights of what has outperformed and increasing the weights of what has underperformed (i.e. selling high and buying low in a systematic way). Such an approach has typically produced better results than market strategists making big-picture tactical asset allocation (TAA) calls.

In the field of factor-based investing, many different factors have been tried. Besides producing the market-cap-weighted MSCI World index, the MSCI organisation (and others) also produces several factor-based World indexes, including an equal-weighted one. Each factor has certain advantages but invariably outperforms at certain times and underperforms at other times.

The chart below shows the performance of each factor relative to the standard MSCI World benchmark. Although each one has generated alpha over the long term, there is volatility along the way.

The rise of multi-factor models

What has emerged is a trend towards multi-factor models that blend the various factors, smoothing out the alpha volatility because the correlation between them is low.

MSCI has blended four factors (Value, Size, Momentum and Quality) into its MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor (DMF) Index. They impose additional risk controls around country and sector weights, and exposures to growth, liquidity and volatility. The end result is something that mitigates shorter-term cyclicality, while maintaining long-term potential for outperformance (see chart below).

Source: MSCI

These strategies are available to the average investor, not just to institutions. MSCI licenses their indexes to ETF providers who track them. iShares has an ETF version of the multi-factor World index mentioned above. There is an Australian-listed version, the iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor ETF (WDMF.AXW), as well as a US-listed version (ACWF.ARC).

They also have an equivalent multi-factor ETF for Australian equities, the iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (AUMF.AXW), and one for Emerging Markets equities, the iShares Edge MSCI Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (EMGF.BZX) listed in the US. There is also an Australian-listed version called the VanEck Vectors MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMKT.AXW). The MSCI indexes underlying these ETFs have a demonstrated history of outperforming their respective market-cap-weighted benchmarks over the long term.

A wide range of alternatives for retail investors

Other ETF providers such as Vanguard, BetaShares and State Street also offer factor-based ETFs listed on the ASX (a list of ETFs can be found in the ASX report on this link in Cuffelinks).

Lessons learned by big institutional investors over the decades (often learned the hard way) are of relevance to the average investor. Investment solutions that were once only available to the big end of town are now available to anyone willing to learn the same lessons.

 

Marcus Tuck is Head of Equities Research at Mason Stevens. This article is general advice only and does not take into consideration any personal objectives, financial circumstances or needs and should not be relied upon as personal advice.

RELATED ARTICLES

It pays to look under the hood of ETFs

What is smart beta and why is it growing in popularity?

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.