Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 489

The return of shared equity mortgages

Shared equity mortgages, as a solution to Australia’s housing affordability problem, have been talked about for years, but apart from a few failed commercial attempts it has been left to governments to develop initiatives in this area.

But this year things changed, with several financial institutions partnering with investment managers and fintechs to launch shared equity products. Product rollout is still in the early stages, so we are yet to see whether it will work this time.

Products launched or in-train

Groups launching or planning to launch shared equity products include:

  • AMP Bank working with investment company Bricklet;
  • Home Owners’ Partnering Equity (HOPE) working with Police Bank and possibly other lenders;
  • mortgage insurer Genworth and shared equity deposit bond developer OSQO;
  • FrontYa; and
  • OwnHome

AMP’s shared equity partner Bricklet was founded three years ago and has been working with property developers Mirvac and Stockland to develop a shared equity service for property investors. Its partnership with AMP is its first move into the owner occupier market.

It has funding from two private funds owned by high-net-worth investors. Under the arrangement with AMP, the funds will acquire 20-30% of the equity in the property, allowing the bank to lend at a loan-to-valuation ratio of 80% or less and not charge lenders mortgage insurance.

Bricklet chief executive Darren Younger said the investors would expect to hold their equity for five to 10 years, at which time the borrower would be expected to refinance and pay them out (the homeowner can buy out the equity investor at any time).

Investors will receive an annual fee of 6% of the value of their investment in the property and any capital gain on sale of their equity.

Younger said Bricklet would pre-approve home buyers with as little as A$20,000 of savings.

AMP Bank group executive Sean O’Malley said the bank was targeting borrowers with appropriate income to service the loan but who don’t have a deposit. The product is not designed for social housing purposes.

HOPE launched a shared equity scheme this year, announcing that it had raised A$30 million of investor funds. The HOPE scheme will co-invest up to 50% of a mortgage and is designed for essential workers such as teachers, police and nurses.

In November, its initial partner Police Bank settled its first loans under the scheme.

Mortgage insurer Genworth has invested in OSQO, a start-up that hopes to fill home buyers’ deposit gaps. OSQO is developing a platform that raises funds from a range of sources, including private investors, to provide home buyers with a 'shared equity deposit bond' to fund a deposit.

OSQO will pay investors quarterly interest at prevailing mortgage rates, which is passed through from the home buyers, and advise home buyers on the best time to refinance and pay out their OSQO finance.

It claims its fees will be cheaper than the cost of lenders mortgage insurance would be if the borrowers took out a loan with a loan-to-valuation ratio over 80%.

Genworth chief executive Pauline Blight-Johnson said she hopes to have an OSQO product in the market next year.

FrontYa, which was launched last year, offers to double a home buyer’s deposit with a contribution of up to $250,000 for approved properties. The funding is for six years and FrontYa will take 25% of the property’s capital appreciation over that time.

If there is no increase in value, the property owner is only required to repay the deposit funding. The company is yet to provide any details of partnerships with enders of its business activity.

OwnHome, which was launched last year, offers a variation on the shared equity theme. It will buy the property for customers, who enter a lease agreement and an option agreement.

The option to buy the property from OwnHome can be exercised any time from year three to year seven. The price will be the OwnHome purchase cost plus an increase of 3.8% a year. Each year, 2.5% of the monthly lease payments go to “purchase credits”.

OwnHome does a serviceability assessment of the customer to determine what the price of the property will be and then allows the customer to choose a property in that price range. OwnHome will be the title holder until the option is exercised.

And in another variation, BankFirst has a Shared Equity Agreement that supports parents or other family members who contribute money towards a deposit. The formal agreement protects the contributor’s interest if circumstances change and they need the money back.

 

John Kavanagh is Associate Editor of Banking Day. This article is republished with permission.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A housing market that I'd like to see

What's left unsaid in Australia's housing bubble

Financial pathways to buying a home require planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.