Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 293

Risk vs reward: How do P2P lenders stack up?

Peer-to-peer lending (P2P) allows everyday Australians to take advantage of investing in consumer loans, a well-established asset class that was previously the exclusive domain of banks and institutional investors.

P2P lending takes place via an online marketplace that uses technology to match borrowers who seek a competitive loan with investors who seek competitive returns.

To everyday investors (including SMSFs), P2P lenders deliver a new source of attractive, stable returns, with regular payments from borrowers. To borrowers, P2P lenders provide an attractive alternative to traditional financial products, with lower rates and a simpler, easier customer experience. By reducing inefficiency, P2P lenders can offer better value to everyone.

If you’re thinking about investing in a P2P lending platform, or have already invested, it’s important to understand the relationship between risk and reward. RateSetter is Australia’s largest P2P lender, with over 14,000 registered Australian investors, including an increasing number of SMSFs. Here we look at how RateSetter manages risk and reward to provide investors with an attractive and stable investment opportunity.

Credit criteria

RateSetter is committed to ensuring that investor risk is managed carefully, not only during benign economic periods, such as we are experiencing now, but also in tougher economic climates. This starts with carefully screening loan applicants to minimise borrower credit risk. We have a large underwriting team that uses both innovative technologies and traditional resources (such as credit bureau information) to analyse data and assess each applicant’s credit risk. Their primary objective, of course, is to lend only to creditworthy borrowers, and ensure that when they do approve a loan applicant, any risks are appropriately priced.

Loss protection – the RateSetter Provision Fund

RateSetter offers a unique additional buffer to help manage risk: our Provision Fund. RateSetter’s Provision Fund is a pool of cash available to compensate investors in the event of borrower late payments or defaults. While the Provision Fund doesn’t provide a guarantee, it currently represents over $12 million, representing 160% coverage of RateSetter’s anticipated loss rate. We’re very proud of the fact that, to date, our Provision Fund has ensured that no RateSetter investor has ever lost a single cent.

Choice and control

One of the best things about P2P lending is the control it gives investors over the amount they lend, the rate at which they lend, and the loan term. With RateSetter, investors decide which market they wish to invest in (from one month to five years) and then select the rate at which they wish to lend. The platform then matches their funds to corresponding loan orders, much like a sell order is matched on a stock market.

Our expertise

As experts in consumer credit risk, RateSetter considers risk assessment to be our responsibility. Our team of experienced professionals protects lenders from undue risk by rigorously assessing each borrower applicant. That means we choose who to lend to, simplifying the process for investors.

Transparency

At RateSetter, transparency is paramount. On our website, investors can access data related to every loan RateSetter has funded through the RateSetter Lending Platform since its launch in 2014, as well as a host of supplementary information, such as the credit performance of loans funded each year.

Every investment entails a degree of risk. At RateSetter, we’re committed to ensuring that our investors understand the risks associated with their investments, and, importantly, that we can mitigate these risks to offer investors strong and stable returns on an ongoing basis.

Ready to find out more or start investing? Get started here.

 

Daniel Foggo is CEO of RateSetter, Australia’s largest peer-to-peer lender, and a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.  Investors should make their own independent enquiries and consult with a financial adviser.

For more articles and papers from RateSetter, please click here.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

How marketplace lending meets investor needs

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.