Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 266

Will the Royal Commission end our debt obsession?

Australians appear to be addicted to leverage, and most specifically, housing leverage. In 23 of the last 25 years, Australian household leverage has increased. That is, the average household has borrowed more money for the same dollar of income. The debt to income ratio has continued to rise, with only occasional pauses. Will this continue into perpetuity? We are reminded of a famous German proverb, “Trees don’t grow to the sky.”

Source: Reserve Bank of Australia, Auscap

Household debt as a percentage of disposable income now exceeds 190%.

Housing credit is now over 62% of total private sector credit.

Source: Reserve Bank of Australia, Auscap

Part of the equation has been falling borrowing costs. As interest rates fall, households can afford to borrow more money with the same dollar of income. Whether this is a sensible strategy is a question for debate. In recent years, APRA has started to insist that lenders use a minimum borrower interest rate assumption of 7% to assess a borrower’s capacity. This is recognising that interest rates are unlikely to stay low forever, and that housing loans are typically written over a 25 or 30 year period. Ensuring that households can afford their loans under a higher interest rate scenario is logical and sensible.

Will greater recognition of expenses be the straw that breaks the camel's back?

The Financial Services Royal Commission appears to have uncovered another reason explaining why and how leverage has been ballooning. The availability of credit has been growing partly due to the widespread understating of household expenses and a corresponding lack of due diligence by lenders to investigate the facts. The Household Expenditure Measure (HEM), an index designed to put a floor on claims of low living expenses, was relied on by many loan applicants and lenders as the estimate for actual annual non-housing related living expenses. When applied, this index has been an unrealistically low approximation for the majority of households.

We suspect ensuring appropriate household expenditure due diligence by lenders will be an outcome of the Royal Commission. As Wayne Byers, Chairman of APRA, stated in a speech to the Australian Business Economists,

“Under ASIC’s responsible lending obligations, banks are required to make reasonable inquiries into borrowers’ living expenses, and APRA’s own prudential practice guide is clear that benchmarks shouldn’t be relied on to proxy expenses. Benchmarks can be helpful in providing a prudent floor where borrower declared expenses appear low, but should not be a replacement for making reasonable inquiries.”

The major banks appear to have already adopted more stringent measures. Formal due diligence on bank account and credit card statements could be an outcome. Positive comprehensive credit reporting will undoubtedly give lenders a greater ability to assess a borrower’s financial position.

How this affects leverage ratios and the creation of household credit is unclear. Household leverage ratios may be peaking. This is significant, because increasing leverage has clearly been a partial driver of house price growth over recent years. Credit contraction would reduce property price growth. The outcome of the Royal Commission, APRA’s multi-year focus on ensuring prudent lending standards and the banks’ adoption of more rigid standards is not yet clear in the data. As Wayne Byers commented “the changes in lending practices to date do not seem to have had an obvious impact on housing credit flows in aggregate”. But perhaps this is no surprise. Living expenses featured in the Royal Commission in March 2018. Our enquiries with a number of lenders suggest that living expenses came into greater focus around this time. So, will a sustained focus on living expenses be the straw that breaks the camel’s back?

Mixed reporting of credit growth

The size of domestic credit in aggregate relates to the stock of total credit in an economy. It is last year’s aggregate credit plus new credit created less any credit extinguished.

Source: Reserve Bank of Australia, Auscap

It is our view that this is a lagging indicator for what is happening in the economy, which operates more on the flow of credit. That is, how much new credit is being created this year versus how much was created last year. The largest component of credit is housing-related credit.

Source: Reserve Bank of Australia, Auscap

The most recent May 2018 data point suggests new housing credit growth is weak, coming in at just +0.08% on an annualised basis. The actual exchange of properties that has led to this data most likely occurred six to eight weeks prior. This data potentially predates any changes made by lenders following the focus on household expense verification.

We suspect there are other leading indicators, such as auction clearance rates. It would be understandable that vendors have price expectations based on comparable sales made six to twelve months ago. But if a borrower’s capacity has been reduced, there might be a noticeable gap between a buyer’s ability to pay and a vendor’s expectation on price. Clearance rates around the country have recently fallen significantly.

Weekly Australian Auction Clearance Rate, Combined Capital Cities

Source: Corelogic

If lower clearance rates and listing volumes are symptomatic of falling housing credit growth, this should become apparent in the data over the coming months. The level of housing credit growth has important implications for the domestic economy. Has Australia become overly reliant on the creation of housing credit and increased household leverage to fuel economic growth? Only time will tell, but it might provide both long and short opportunities in the near term.


Tim Carleton is Principal and Portfolio Manager at Auscap Asset Management, a boutique Australian equities-focussed long/short investment manager. This article contains information that is general in nature. It does not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person. 


The pace and structure of lending stifles Australia


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Latest Updates


'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

Policy proposals allow young people to access their super for a home bought from older people who put the money back into super. It helps some first buyers into a home earlier but it may push up prices.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.


Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.


Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.


Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.