Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 133

Ructions in the SMSF market

Two issues that are currently working their way through the SMSF market could have a profound impact on the way the market operates.

The first involves the way that the largest profession servicing this market, accountants, operates. The second involves an aggressive tax play used by SMSFs.

Let’s start with a reminder of how the SMSF market is regulated.

What’s happening to accountants?

While becoming a member of an SMSF technically is a dealing in a ‘financial product’, which would normally require the adviser to be licensed under the Corporations Act, accountants are, until 1 July 2016, exempt from those rules when advising on setting up or winding down an SMSF.

Now things are changing and accountants need, from that date, either a full financial services licence or a limited financial services licence, if they want to advise a client on setting up an SMSF and dealing with their existing superannuation interest.

The most obvious client example where this would be relevant would be an individual coming up to retirement having, say, $700,000 in a retail or industry super fund, who wants to manage it themselves using an SMSF, as they will now have more time on their hands. Usually, they would seek guidance from their trusted accountant, but what will happen in future?

If the accountant goes down the licencing route, either as a licensee or an authorised representative of a licensee, their world changes significantly as the business will differ greatly from an accounting practice. At a macro conceptual level, licensees and authorised representatives work on a ‘disclosure basis’, in that the potential investor has to have all the risks associated with a potential investment disclosed and then they decide whether to invest or not.

At a legal relationship level, there are a whole range of rules for managing conflicts of interest by licensees and authorised reps, such as acting in the best interest of the client and not being remunerated by commission.

At a practical level there is also the paper work. Licensees and authorised reps must tell clients what they can do in terms of financial services (a Financial Services Guide) and, more importantly, they must document their recommendations and reasons for them (a Statement of Advice).

Compare this formal and stylistic way of working with that of an accountant, which is largely the reverse, where clients rely on and trust decisions and recommendations made by accountants. Ultimately, clients rely on the membership of an accounting body subject to its ethical and professional conduct restraints.

(Note, there are a few alternatives for accountants who do not want to go the licensing option, such as providing execution-only services or co-venturing with a licensed financial adviser who does all the activity requiring a licence).

ATO closing a contributions loophole

The other issue that will affect the SMSF market involves income tax. To limit the amount of tax benefits anyone can get out of using a SMSF, there are limits on how much they can contribute, both concessionally-taxed and after-tax. These are called the contribution caps.

It was different prior to 2007, when you could put as much into a SMSF as you wanted (not all of which would be deductible of course), but if you took out more that was considered reasonable, you paid extra tax. These were called the Reasonable Benefit Limits. From 2007, the tax system reverted to the way that it had operated before 1997, when there were limits on the amount that could be contributed to a SMSF. Which is what we have now with the caps.

If instead of contributing to a SMSF and being limited by the contribution caps, you could lend all your wealth interest free, well, you have just driven a Mack truck through some pretty important integrity measures in the system, being those contribution caps.

As you are both the borrower, being a member of your SMSF, and the lender, why pay yourself interest? Indeed, that is what has been happening.

The ATO is now actively trying to resolve this serious integrity breach by reclassifying the income that the SMSF receives from the investment that it acquires with the funds that have been borrowed at zero interest from the member as “Non Arm’s Length Income”- NALI, in the trade (an unfortunate acronym for those involved). That type of income is taxed at the highest marginal tax rate and not the preferential super tax rates of 15% or 0% if in pension mode.

After a couple of false starts, the ATO has now put the SMSF market on notice of the risk of tax at 47% on related party non-commercial loans.

The SMSF advising market seems to have got the message and are now saying that all loans to SMSFs, including from related parties, should be on full commercial terms. Not just with respect to the interest charged, but also in terms of LVRs and payment schedules.

 

Gordon Mackenzie is a Senior Lecturer in taxation and business law at the Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales.

RELATED ARTICLES

Top 10 hints for SMSF trustees before 30 June

What exactly is the ATO’s role in SMSFs?

What are wealth industry regulators thinking about?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.