Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 312

Senator Hume imposes moral obligation before SG increases

SG; super guarantee

SG; super guarantee

Senator Jane Hume is the new Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology. In her 20 years before entering politics in 2016, she worked in banking, funds management and superannuation in roles at Deutsche Bank, Rothschilds, National Australia Bank and AustralianSuper.

In the last two weeks, she has given her first speech and interview, and while no new policies were announced, she gave a road map on what to expect for the next few years. Most significant was the requirement to meet a "moral obligation" for efficiency.

The moral obligation before SG increase

Interviewed in The Sydney Morning Herald on 25 June 2019, Senator Hume said:

“If a system is compulsory and it quarantines nearly $1 in every $10 that you earn for up to 40 years, it is imperative that the government make that system as efficient as possible ... There is no time to waste.”

“Which is why we have to get rid of high fees, duplicate accounts, underperforming funds and unnecessary insurance, because that’s what makes the system inefficient.”

She nominated better outcomes for superannuation savers as her most important priority. Improvements must be made as a "moral obligation" before the scheduled and legislated increases in the superannuation guarantee (SG) rate from 9.5% to 10% in 2021, up to 12% by 2025.

Senator Hume’s first speech

Her first speech as Assistant Minister was at the Bloomberg Buy Side Forum, and here are some direct quotations:

“The Treasurer has stated publicly we are ‘positively disposed to a review of the retirement income system as recommended by the Productivity Commission.’ The Government will provide further information about the Review in due course.”

“The (Productivity Report) found a number of structural problems in the system and concluded that the prevalence of unintended multiple accounts, pockets of entrenched underperformance and the sheer complexity of navigating the system have eroded members’ trust in the system as well as their balances.”

“In an industry crowded with opinion makers, industry groups and lobbyists, it is important that consumers themselves have a stronger voice. As such, the government has announced our intention to establish a superannuation consumer advocate and will be consulting on the scope of its activities, funding and governance arrangements.”

“Currently, there is very little guidance on how retirees should draw down their savings when they reach retirement. The Government is addressing this by developing a retirement income framework, which includes a covenant requirement for funds to develop a retirement income strategy. The Government is also exploring ways of expanding the range of retirement income products available. Funds will need to consider the retirement income needs of their members, as well as provide guidance to their members to select the most appropriate retirement solution for their circumstances.”

Following the Bloomberg event, she told The Australian:

“We made some pretty significant reforms in 2016 and I don’t think there is any intention that we would do any more at this stage.”

This suggests changes will be more about implementing work already in the pipeline, but the Liberal Party also made promises in 2013 and 2014 not to change superannuation taxes but then Scott Morrison as Treasurer implemented numerous changes.

So watch this space for the review proposed by Josh Frydenberg, and a revisit of recommendations from both the Productivity and Royal Commissions.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks.

 

6 Comments
David Williams
June 28, 2019

Whatever we do with super, people are still appallingly under-educated about how the rest of their life (their longevity) could pan out. Any review of super should start with correcting this as a primary objective.

stefy
June 27, 2019

More changes coming. Will it ever end?

Chris
June 27, 2019

Another major inefficiency is the time delay in SGC payments being made to the super funds. These payments, which belong to the worker, are being used to help employers' cashflow - that is not what was intended.

nick
June 26, 2019

Wonder if she took the moral high ground when she worked in the banking and finance industry.

Warren Bird
June 27, 2019

Give it a break!

For goodness sake, is everyone who has ever worked in banking and finance now automatically under a moral cloud because of the sins of a small portion of the industry? As serious as those sins were, the vast majority of their colleagues were/are appalled and disgusted by the things that were done; the vast majority just got on with doing a good job, looking after customers; the vast majority do not deserve such slurs.

I do not know Ms Hume personally, but I suspect she of all former bankers is not deserving of a such a slur. Not mentioned in the intro was her nearly 5 years as a Director of the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne.

Whoever you are 'nick', it's easy to throw slurs at people you don't know, but a tiny bit of research might have led you to think twice about this one.

Jennifer Harris
June 27, 2019

Warren Bird....well said

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.