Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 282

Senior Australians’ changing relationship with financial advisers

This article is the fourth in a series written by leading retirement website YourLifeChoices. It draws on surveys that show the level of satisfaction with the financial services sector.

YourLifeChoices’ members say that they are less likely to seek advice from financial advisers in the aftermath of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. Tellingly, for those who have sought financial advice, satisfaction with the quality of the guidance has fallen sharply from 75% to 50% in the past two years. Our members are aged from 55 to 75 years and have a focus on maximising their retirement income.

Reasons for not visiting a financial adviser

Two years ago, the YourLifeChoices 2016 Insights Survey showed that of 4,155 respondents, 57% had visited a professional to discuss finances in the previous year.

The main reasons given for not visiting a planner were:

  • Perceived high costs
  • Insufficient assets or funds
  • Ability to satisfactorily manage their own financial affairs
  • Lack of trust in the profession.

Many responses complained of financial planners pushing their own products. Another sizeable group said they did not understand how to assess the quality or independence of the guidance. Still others claimed they had received bad advice that had hampered their returns, which had put them off seeking financial advice again.

Royal Commission will affect use of advisers

Early this year, the 2018 Insights Survey found the proportion of members that had sought financial advice had grown from 57% in 2016 to 63%. However, by July 2018, after the Royal Commission had been in hearings for a few months, members started to lose faith in the financial services sector. The percentage of those who had or would consider consulting a financial adviser about their retirement had fallen to 53%.

The vast majority of members, 86%, say they manage their own finances, although some may also see a financial adviser. In the YourLifeChoices Boomer Consumer Survey undertaken in October 2018, 37% said they would be willing to take an average risk in order to receive average returns. Almost 9% said they would take substantial risk with investments and less than a third said they were not willing to take financial risks.

Asked where they had sought advice, of 1,719 respondents, about 500 had reached out to their superannuation fund and approximately 500 to their own financial planner. The next highest category was banks (about 200 respondents), an accountant (158) and Centrelink (140).

The recent Interim Report on the Royal Commission’s findings continued to highlight failures in the financial planning sector, leaving many Australians wondering if they should pay for advice. Commissioner Kenneth Hayne said about those providing advice.

“Whether the conduct is said to have been motivated by ‘greed’, ‘avarice’ or ‘the pursuit of profit’, it is conduct that ignored the most basic standards of honesty.”

Winning back client confidence

On World Financial Planning Day in October 2018, the Financial Planning Association of Australia outlined six steps to help people locate a reputable adviser. We outlined those steps in an article, Who can you trust with your money?.

Judging from the responses to that article, it will take more than a how-to guide to restore confidence in this profession. Here is a sample of what retirees said:

  • “Why is it taking so long to bring in education/regulations for new and existing advisers? This should be immediate. Why should it take five years for current advisers to meet the required standard? Either they meet it now through ‘recognition of prior learning’, which allows for experience to be accepted, or they should be suspended from working until they can.”
  • “Massive internal changes and changes in ethos are required now to restore any faith or trust in financial institutions.”
  • “Financial advisers want profit, and they will always put their own income ahead of client interests. (Now) they will make noises. They will change the technicalities in a few rules, but nothing will change for the client.”

Other survey respondents blamed the regulators – the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA). They are, after all, entrusted to ensure misconduct in the financial services sector is minimised.

 

Olga Galacho is a writer at YourLifeChoices, Australia’s leading retirement website for over-55s. It delivers independent information and resources to 230,000 members across Australia.

 

5 Comments
Jason M
December 03, 2018

The comments here are based on the incorrect thought that Financial Planners manage investors money. What we actual manage is investors behavior.

When you manage an investors behavior and use the tools of tax laws, centrelink laws, estate planning, cashflow planning, forecasting software, and have an understanding of a persons goals, but not only understand those goals but understand why they the person want to achieve those goals and why it's so important. Having a person on your side like that and walking beside you is a pretty important ally.

Carolyn
November 29, 2018

The general impression that financial advisors want to make my money their money, with the least possible input or hard work, is probably true of a percentage of fin advisors to the detriment of the good ones, but unfortunately, they are all tarred with the same brush.

For me, I am sticking to a good performing (over 10 Years) industry fund for my super. I will put the rest of my money into diversified dividend paying shares with DRI programs. The shares I invest in will be well-known brands I like to use or who have long-standing strong performances. For tax advice, I will consult my accountant. I will let compound interest do the rest.

I will continue to take an interest in investing and continue to educate myself on the subject. Upon retirement, I shall reevaluate and probably get advice via my trusted industry Superfund.

I am sure there are flaws in my plan but to be honest I don't think I could do any worse than most fin. advisors and if I am going to lose money I would rather it be because of my mistakes than the mistakes of an advisor to which I have paid thousands of dollars, which I could have invested as above.

Eliza
November 30, 2018

I am with you Carolyn, why pay someone to lose your money when you can lose it for free. It boils down to risk and trust. One tends to trust the risk you knowingly take.
Unfortunately we are at the stage when we need someone to do the Admin so now have to “trust” someone. We have structured our finances so not all eggs in one basket- not ideal but not totally vulnerable. You cannot move a SMSF to an Industry or Retail Fund without losing the Tax Free balances. To keep those Pensions, you are required to have an account for each Pension, equaling multiple account fees!

Ann
November 29, 2018

Absolute rubbish. Out of 300 clients that I have not one of them understands why we are all being punished because of the bad behaviour of few individuals and mainly large institutions. Getting a degree doesn't make someone honest nor give them automatic empathy or life experience.

Steve
November 29, 2018

In relation to fee conscious retirees, I trust they find their experience at Centrelink is enjoyable instead then. Last time I visited our local Centrelink office there were 5 police officers chasing an escaped prisoner around with guns. Enjoy the low fees....

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A new, client-centric model of advice

ASIC is not soft: who's next in line for scrutiny?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.