Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 520

The sharemarket of deathly hollows

After 38 years as a public company, vitamins group Blackmores recently fell into Japanese hands when more than 96.85% of voting stock supported Kirin’s attractive $95 a share $1.8 billion takeover bid.

Sadly, this isn’t a new phenomenon. The past four years has delivered an unprecedented splurge of takeovers of ASX listed companies which has coincided with an unprecedented drought of big floats, leading to a hollowing out of the ASX lists.

The 29 substantial public takeovers completed over this period have included the following ASX listed companies:

Afterpay, ALE Property Group, Ausnet Services, Automotive Holdings, Aveo, Blackmores, Bellamy’s, Bingo, Coca Cola Amatil, Crown Resorts, Dulux, Galaxy Resources, Healthscope, Infigen Energy, CIMIC, Milton, MYOB, Nearmap, Oil Search, OZ Minerals, Pendal, Slater & Gordon, Spark Infrastructure, Sydney Airport, Tassal, Uniti Group, Village Roadshow, Vocus Communications and Western Areas.

List-less

The total equity value of these companies exceeded $100 billion, as can be seen from this comprehensive but quite shocking list of 163 companies which were once capitalised at more than $1 billion on the ASX but are no longer listed today, whether it be from takeover or collapse.

The ASX admits we’ve got a problem re-stocking the public company shelves. A spokesman said:

IPOs are cyclical and we are at the bottom of the cycle right now. It’s the slowest it’s been in a decade. However, this is not unique to ASX. It’s a global phenomenon as a result of uncertain investor sentiment due to geopolitical issues, but more importantly inflation and the impact on monetary policy – where will rates go and what will be the impact on economies? Compared with our global peers, we do a lot of IPOs, and while numbers are significantly down this year, historically we have listed around 130 new companies annually.

Takeover targets

In addition to the Blackmores exit, the pipeline of upcoming takeovers is also looking ominous with the following major deals announced but not yet approved by shareholders:

Costa Group: floated by the Costa family and its US private equity partner Paine in 2015 and then Paine has returned with an indicative $1.6 billion offer announced earlier this month.

Invocare: the death industry giant has agreed to an indicative offer by US private equity firm TPG at $13 a share or $2.2 billion in total and we’re just awaiting the completion of due diligence.

Newcrest Mining: the biggest remaining ASX-listed gold miner has signed a binding agreement to be taken over by Denver-based US giant Newmont in an all-scrip offer valued at $29 billion which will go to a vote once the usual 300-page scheme book is finalised.

Origin Energy: signed a 142 page binding agreement way back on March 27 to sell itself for $18.7 billion to Canadian giant Brookfield and its US partner MidOcean Energy for $8.91 a share with a shareholder vote due later this year. This is a bit embarrassing given that the board knocked back BG Group’s $15.50 a share offer way back in August 2008. If you’re going to sell off the farm, at least maximise the price.

United Malt: was only spun out of Graincorp in 2020 but is being snapped up by Soufflet Group, a private French company controlled by the Soufflet family which has offered $5 a share or $1.5 billion in total.

So, what’s left to buy and sell?

Once you’ve digested this surprisingly long list of 163 departed $1 billion-plus companies have a look at this list tracking what’s left in the form of the current “top 150 companies” which were listed in The Australian’s weekend edition on Saturday.

At face value, it should be re-assuring that the 150th company, 4WD outfit ARB, has a healthy market capitalisation of $2.49 billion.

However, The Australian’s list is not what it seems.

For starters, it includes ten New Zealand companies, such as Infratil, Auckland Airport, Fisher & Paykel and Meridian Energy. Well, at least their assets aren’t too far away, unlike others on the list such as Zimplats Holdings, which has a big platinum operation in Zimbabwe, or Champion Iron which only operates mines in Quebec.

For some reason, The Australian doesn’t list News Corp, even though it has a secondary listing on the ASX and substantial assets here.

However, The Australian has included six ETFs listed in their top 150, such as the Vanguard Australian Shares Index which comes in at number 40 with a market capitalisation of $12.39 billion. Are ETFs even “companies”? When all they do is invest in other companies or asset classes?

Why is this happening?

There are a number of factors behind this hollowing out of the ASX. The first is our general inability to develop successful Australian head-quartered multi-national companies like Computershare, CSL, Macquarie, QBE and Wisetech.

Then there is our open-door policy for takeovers, which is arguably more liberal than other country, with the possible exception of the UK. As this list of more than 320 foreign companies turning over $200 million-plus in the Australian market shows, an increasingly large chunk of the Australian economy is foreign-owned.

Big Super on the rise

The next issue is the growing tendency for our big industry super funds to take public companies private. Vocus Communications, Sydney Airport and ALE Property Group were all snapped up by industry funds over the past three years.

Standby for more of this with toll road company Atlas Arteria expecting a bid soon from Industry Funds Management (IFM) which has already amassed a 23% stake on market.

Foreign trade buyers have also been active over the past four years with Nippon Paint buying Dulux, Canadian fish giant Cooke Inc buying Tassal and the French purchase of United Malt.

And then there is private equity

However, it is private equity which is the biggest driver, having taken out dozens of companies over the years, with many more in prospect.

And imagine if all of their prospective bids had proceeded. Surviving ASX100 companies like Ramsay Healthcare, Treasury Wine Estates and Santos have all rebuffed private equity bids in recent years.\

Too much power

The final problem is weak competition laws in Australia which have seen far too many takeovers approved, creating excessive domestic market power for the predators.

For instance, Howard Smith traded as a public company for 143 years until Wesfarmers was allowed to buy it for $2.7 billion in 2001. This eliminated its main Bunnings competitor, the BBC hardware chain, and made life hard for the remaining independents. Even Woolworths couldn’t compete with its failed Masters venture.

If you read through the ‘disappeared companies list’ you’ll see countless other examples. For instance, buried inside the privatised Commonwealth Bank is three former state banks – BankWest, State Bank of Victoria and State Bank of NSW – along with former mutual Colonial. No wonder CBA is a super profitable behemoth, making it takeover proof forever and a day.

A watchdog regrets

In his farewell February 2022 speech as Australian Competition and Consumer Commission boss, Rod Sims told the National Press Club that he regrets the power imbalance between big and small businesses in Australia, including the plight of farmers battling to get reasonable terms out of supermarket giants.

It’s a problem which is being exacerbated by the current startling run of ASX takeovers and the lack of viable scaled new competitors emerging to compete.

 

Stephen Mayne is a Walkley Award winning journalist, shareholder activist, former City of Melbourne councillor, former spin-doctor for Jeff Kennett’s Victorian Liberal Government, current City of Manningham councillor, founder of Crikey and publisher of The Mayne Report. This article was first published by Michael West Media.

 

10 Comments
Ian
August 06, 2023

The issue that allows boards and shareholders to agree to takeovers at lowish prices is a lack of understanding of the underlying value of the company being taken over. Prices quoted on the sharemarket reflect "traders" activity, rather than value. It would be handy to see a differentiation between transactions between "investors" who have held shares for longer than 12 months selling to "investors" who are purchasing those shares with a view to holding them for a longer term, as distinct from the prices at which day-to-day traders transact. With modern computing technology, and an extra question when transactions are reported, I am sure such a register could be compiled. Then we would see what people consider is the real investment value of a company.

Kim
August 06, 2023

I contacted both my Federal MHR and State MP (who was also Premier) regarding the Spark Infrastructure takeover. Spark owned the poles and wires of our state's electricity transmission and I did not want to see 100% foreign ownership. Might have saved myself the bother. Federal MHR responded that he could not do anything but let the Labor Minister know my concerns - and my local State MP (Marshall) did not bother to respond. My iother concern was that my holding in SKI was paying good returns, which cannot be easily replicated.

Margit
August 06, 2023

Strongly resonates with me having been 'taken over' on some occasions. Australia sells anything and everything to the highest bidder instead of building a strong and expanding home base

paulporta@hotmail.com
August 06, 2023

PP
For whatever reason, and there are many, the listed market does not reflect the real long-term worth of the companies hence the opportunists Private unlisted companies (public and private) have shareholders, many fewer, with a common goal and less competing interests. Sounds textbook but my sense.

David Edwards
August 04, 2023

Another point made recently at a recent AGM is this: if an Aussie company gets taken over, what incentives (nudge nudge) might have been held out to the CEO or Board member/s to stay on with the now-taken-over Company as "consultants" on a very healthy retainer? How would this affect their decision to cave in to takeover offers and roll over for a tummy-rub? Mmmmm

Morag
August 03, 2023

Quote: "weak competition laws in Australia which have seen far too many takeovers approved, creating excessive domestic market power for the predators." Takeovers often preceded by brutal shorting campaigns to drive VWAP as low as possible prior to predatory offers. Those campaigns use HFT bots, usually in concert with media mis-information 'campaigns' place downward pressure on share prices (aka 'manipulation'). And ASIC does nothing to prevent these strategies.

david edwards
August 03, 2023

Absolutely spot-on, Stephen and Don....except that Stephen's list of taken-over companies (esp. to foreign/Private Equity entities ) is waay too small. Too many good companies are being bought out at bottom-of-the-cycle prices and foolish shareholders lap up the specious reasons from a slovenly Board in favour of a takeover. Sydney Airport is the most blatant example of a rock-solid company bought out for almost exactly the market price immediately pre-Covid. Shareholders are thus lumbered with a large Capital gain (or loss) NOT at a time of their choosing. Future growth and cyclical revival of the share price is lost to solid longterm local shareholders. If Boards and management can't release the value that the foreign/private takeover entity subsequently enjoys, then Shareholders should muscle up and vote in a new pro-active Board to release and grow that value of that Company for the benefit of local shareholders. If a $10 share has a cyclical price retreat to, say, $8, an $8.80 takeover price trumpeted as a 10% premium to current market price is no comfort to existing shareholders who lose massively and also are removed from any future recovery in otherwise good solid Aussie companies. Thank God CSL and BHP and Commonwealth Bank didn't sell out to those offering 30 pieces of silver!!

Don
August 03, 2023

Excellent points. A big part of the problem is the ridiculous process boards use to respond to takeover offers. The Sydney Airport “takeover “ still makes my blood boil. How that business with its wonderful prospects for future growth and earnings could have been sold for a rather modest premium beats me. Invocare is another case in point. It is about to be knocked down for a price which might look good relative to recent equity pricing but seriously undervalues the prospects of an excellent business. As with Sydney Airport, as a small shareholder, I would very much prefer to stick with it by rejecting takeover offers. How boards conclude selling is the best interests of shareholders beats me. Funny that the buyer seems keen to buy at the offered price. At the current rate, there won’t be much left for retail shareholders and SMSFs to own - the big super funds will have swept everything up.

Ramon Vasquez
August 03, 2023

Exactly ! Very well said . l am in the same boat . I was taken over in TNT , TOLL , SYD . UMG and now GNC .

Good Luck . Ramon .

CC
August 04, 2023

agree completely. greedy board members with an eye only for personal short term gains rather than long term shareholder wealth generation. SYD should never have been allowed to be taken over.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why private equity can continue to outperform

Share Purchase Plans brickbats and bouquets

5 big calls for 2024

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

Shares

On the virtue of owning wonderful businesses like CBA

The US market has pummelled Australia's over the past 16 years and for good reason: it has some incredible businesses. Australia does too, but if you want to enjoy US-type returns, you need to know where to look.

Investment strategies

Why bank hybrids are being priced at a premium

As long as the banks have no desire to pay up for term deposit funding - which looks likely for a while yet - investors will continue to pay a premium for the higher yielding, but riskier hybrid instrument.

Investment strategies

The Magnificent Seven's dominance poses ever-growing risks

The rise of the Magnificent Seven and their large weighting in US indices has led to debate about concentration risk in markets. Whatever your view, the crowding into these stocks poses several challenges for global investors.

Strategy

Wealth is more than a number

Money can bolster our joy in real ways. However, if we relentlessly chase wealth at the expense of other facets of well-being, history and science both teach us that it will lead to a hollowing out of life.

The copper bull market may have years to run

The copper market is barrelling towards a significant deficit and price surge over the next few decades that investors should not discount when looking at the potential for artificial intelligence and renewable energy.

Property

Global REITs are on sale

Global REITs have been out of favour for some time. While office remains a concern, the rest of the sector is in good shape and offers compelling value, with many REITs trading below underlying asset replacement costs.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.