Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 315

The ‘six or out’ VC approach to portfolios

American venture capitalists (VCs) often talk about home runs. VC portfolios are structured to maximise the chance of at least one successful investment that will return the fund multiple times the original investment. Statistically, we know that around 90% of returns for VC investors will come from just 10% of early-stage investments. These are the home runs. The other 90% of businesses will either deliver a modest return or worse-case scenario, no return at all. Home runs are essential to provide the returns that set VCs apart and that investors are expecting.

In the more popular language of cricket for Australia, VC investors need to maximise their chances of hitting a six when constructing their portfolio. And those of us who have dedicated many a summer (or winter in the recent Cricket World Cup) to watching cricket will know that if a batsman protects their wicket too intensely, they can’t take the backswing necessary to hit the six. Instead, they will be forced to settle for singles and dot balls.

Losing wickets is inevitable in early-stage investing

VCs also know that losing a few wickets is an inevitable and necessary part of the game. VCs are generally comfortable with this but for some investors the idea that loss is inevitable can be uncomfortable and off putting. These investors are hindered by loss aversion and the belief that losses fundamentally loom larger than gains.

VC is different and requires a different mindset. Every investment is made with the conviction that it could be the outlier and an acceptance that many will not. It is okay to lose if there’s a big winner in the portfolio.

To labour the cricket metaphor, we can look at the statistics of cricket legend and former Indian captain, Sachin Tendulkar. During his test career, Tendulkar did not score a single run from 57% of the 29,000 balls he faced. He either blocked or let them go through to the keeper. But of the total runs he scored during his test career, over half (55%) were from fours or sixes although these made up just 7.2% of the total balls he faced. Like Tendulkar and the 29,000 balls he faced, investment in early stage businesses requires VCs and their investors to face a lot of companies and know which are worth a big swing. This is a strategic and disciplined approach to risk taking that VCs gain after years of facing start-ups.

Management of the risk

Portfolio construction in VC is geared to address and mitigate against risk factors as much as possible. Good VCs will ensure that there are enough companies in the portfolio and that there is enough diversity in terms of the different sectors and the underlying technology. Experienced VCs are also adept at spotting patterns and identifying strong founder characteristics, technical expertise and market opportunities that maximises the chances of success.

Hitting a six is not always the end game for VCs and their investors. For larger investors, this is often the beginning of a long partnership, particularly those looking to move the needle on a multi-billion dollar fund. Having identified those start-ups that are rapidly gaining traction and showing accelerated growth, larger institutional investors such as superannuation funds are able to write bigger cheques with lower risk at later stages of the business’ lifecycle. Table 1 shows the company funding life cycle with private market investors at the earlier stages and public market investors being involved at the later stages.

Source: Right Click Capital

The big wins afford VCs and their investors the opportunity to double down on later funding rounds (A, B or C rounds) and participate in growth across other stages such as co-investment opportunities, whether directly or through a mandate structure, and public listings. As high-performing investments progress through the business lifecycle, over time they provide strong returns for a superannuation fund’s venture capital, private equity and listed equities teams.

Table 2 shows an estimate of the number of Australian-based companies raising money in 2018 by stage of investment and reveals a far greater number of opportunities to invest in seed rounds than series A, B and C rounds.

Source: Crunchbase

Table 3 shows the median and average amounts invested in the same deals in 2018 and demonstrates the ability of VCs to invest larger amounts at the later stages of funding as they identify the investments where they have hit a six. VCs who put money to work in businesses at earlier stages need to continue investing in a business’s subsequent rounds in order to maximise their upside when they’re on a winner.

Source: Crunchbase

It’s more about the long term than quick wins

VC often marks the start of a long-term partnership between an investor and a start-up. Ram Nath Kovind, the first Indian President to visit Australia recently commented, “The most successful Australian batsmen in India have been those who have shown patience, read the conditions carefully, settled down for a long innings, nurtured their partnerships and not fallen for spin”.

The same is certainly true for VC investors.

 

Benjamin Chong is a partner at venture capital firm Right Click Capital, investors in high-growth technology businesses. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.