Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 158

We still care about real cash

Even as the world moves closer to becoming ‘cashless’, we seem to care deeply about our cash. Judging from the reaction to the announcement of the design of a new $5 note, we care passionately about how our cash looks.

For those who haven’t been caught up in the frenzy about the new note, let me briefly fill you in.

The Reserve Bank of Australia recently released images of the new $5 note that will be introduced into circulation from 1 September 2016 year, the beginning of a process of issuing new notes across the range of denominations. New artwork will be added on each new note including different species of wattle and Australian native birds.

The new series of notes will have some significantly improved security features to help prevent counterfeiting. Also, to assist the visually impaired, there is a new tactile element that will mean each denomination of note feels different.

Sounds good, no controversy there ... not!

No sooner had the pictures of the new $5 note gone up on the RBA’s website … controversy. Apart from some who simply want the picture of the Queen to go, most of the criticism was levelled at the wattle. Some think it looks like yellow caterpillars, others see bacteria or even … well, vomit. The tactile features are appreciated, though one comment suggested that “only the vision impaired will like this new note”. Not the reaction Glenn Stevens and his team were expecting.

It’s wonderful that we’ve finally done with notes what we did with coins more than 30 years ago – make them easier for the visually-impaired to use. Some of the simple things in life that most of us take for granted, like having a look at the change we’re given to make sure we haven’t been diddled, are difficult for a significant number of people.

A bit of coin history

I was part of the team at Treasury that introduced the $1 coin back in 1983-84 with an interrupted serrated edge to assist the visually-impaired identify it more easily. It might actually surprise a lot of people to realise that Australia did not always have a $1 coin. When decimal currency was first introduced on Valentine’s Day in 1966 the $1 denomination was a note. A rather drab, brown-coloured note, which had Queen Elizabeth and the Coat of Arms on it. The decision to switch to a coin meant that another denomination had to be redesigned so that the image of the Queen appeared somewhere on our paper currency. The $5 note, which originally had Joseph Banks on one side and Caroline Chisholm on the other, was chosen and redesigned for that purpose. There was, at that time, almost no opposition to the idea that Australia’s currency had to honour the Queen in such a way.

The design for the $1 coin triggered some amusing internal debate at Treasury. The Treasurer at the time was John Howard, who proposed that we should look for designers to portray Australian industry. The idea of being Aussie in some way was wholeheartedly embraced by staff, but we could not see how a picture of, say, a mining head poppet would distinguish us from any other country that had mines. Fortunately, Stuart Devlin, who’d designed the original decimal coins 18 years earlier, came up with the lovely image of five kangaroos that we still have on the $1 piece.

Many people simplistically assumed that the $1 coin would be bigger than the 50 cent piece since it’s worth twice as much. Apart from the fact that no coin is really ‘worth’ its face value except by the decree of the government, the critics overlooked that it was going to be gold in colour, rather than silver, and so didn’t need to be bigger. Besides, adding a coin larger than the 50 cent piece would have made people’s pockets ridiculously heavy. The size was set as very similar to the 10 cent piece.

Features for the visually-impaired

The easiest way to tell coins apart is from their size and colour. While most people could tell the difference between the gold coloured $1 and the silver coloured 10 cents, the visually-impaired don’t have that luxury. We devised a series of tests, using visually-impaired people and blind-folded staff members, to evaluate a range of physical features. We found that the interrupted serrations worked well.

I must share an anecdote about the tests. A lady who worked in the Treasury typing pool (sigh, yes, I’m old enough to have worked in the days before word processing and desktop computers) was blind. Her work was to type dictated recordings and she was astonishingly accurate.

When we tested the new coin with her she revealed that, though the interrupted serrations were helpful, she personally didn’t need it. She could distinguish every coin by the sound it made when dropped on the table. We rolled them all – 1 cent, 5 cent, 10 cent, etc – or we dropped them or we flipped them, and this lady identified them correctly every time.

A feature to assist the visually impaired was not included in the original note design, but it changed as a result of a campaign started by a young visually-impaired boy. To him and to the officers of the RBA who listened to his arguments, I say ‘well done’.

More goes into the design of notes and coins than meets the eye.

 

Warren Bird is Executive Director of Uniting Financial Services, a division of the Uniting Church (NSW & ACT). He has 30 years’ experience in fixed income investing. He also serves as an Independent Member of the GESB Investment Committee.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.