Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 280

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

The year is rapidly drawing to a close, which means it’s highly likely that you will now hold completed financial statements for your SMSF. If your balance is over $1.6 million, the first thing you may notice is that your imputation credits refund is down from last year.

This is due to the change in rules made by the Turnbull Government, which restricted the amount that could be held in tax-free pension mode to $1.6 million, leaving the rest of the fund’s earnings to be taxed at 15%.

When trustees no longer need to worry about the cap

The next thing you might discover is that the $1.6 million that was your Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) at 30 June 2017 has now grown. It could easily be worth as much as $1.7 million if your fund earned, say, 7%, while you drew the mandatory pension of 4%.

This situation has triggered a few emails asking what the trustees of the fund should do. Will the TBC now stay at $1.7 million or will it go back to $1.6 million if the amount in pension mode drops as a result of bad performance or increased pension drawings in the current year?

Superannuation guru Monica Rule has good news for you. She tells me that your TBC is no longer relevant, provided the documentation was done properly as at 30 June 2017. As long as your fund did the paperwork correctly on that date, the fund trustees no longer have to concern themselves with the $1.6 million TBC.

Thus, there is no limit to what your super in pension mode could grow to if you had excellent returns, way in excess of the compulsory drawdowns. And there is no penalty if, for any number of reasons, the amount you hold in pension mode drops below $1.6 million.

Continue to draw minimum

But one factor is critical. If all or part of your fund is in pension mode, you are required to draw a set percentage of the balance of the fund that was in pension mode at 30 June. The factor is 4% for anybody under 65 and rises progressively to 14% at age 95 and above.

AgeMinimum pension drawdown factors
55–644%
65–745%
75–796%
80–847%
85–899%
90–9411%
95 or older14%

For example, if you are aged between 65 and 74 you should be withdrawing at least 5% of the previous June balance each year. Therefore, if your balance was $1.6 million at 30 June 2017, you should have drawn $80,000 in pension for the year ended 30 June 2018. However, if your financial statements now show that your TBC has become $1.7 million, you will need to increase your drawdowns in the present year to $85,000.

This is a further example of the complexity of our superannuation system, and the dangers for people running SMSFs who don’t get it right. Despite the penalties, which can be heavy, I am still amazed by the number of questions I receive from people who obviously don’t know what they’re doing. Often, they simply don’t know what they don’t know. This is an area where expert advice is critical.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. Contact him on noel@noelwhittaker.com.au

RELATED ARTICLES

Moving your SMSF into pension phase

How to prevent excessive superannuation balances

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.