Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 607

The state of women's wealth in Australia

Discussions about the gender wealth gap in Australia often centre on superannuation yet it’s not as simple as a shortfall in super contributions. A closer look at the numbers reveals a more complex picture, with broader economic and behavioural factors at play.

Just-released Finder research 'The State of Women’s Wealth - April 2025' shows that the average Australian woman has $428,000 in net wealth - an impressive figure on its own. However, the average Australian man holds $597,000, meaning men have 40% more wealth than women. This disparity is because men’s wealth has grown faster in recent years. This is due to the exceptional performance of Australian property market and global sharemarkets over the past five years, both of which are dominated by male investors.


Rounded to the nearest 1,000. Source: Finder Consumer Sentiment

As covered previously in Firstlinks, the gender super gap is a systemic issue driven by a range of structural factors, including:

  • Unpaid caregiving responsibilities
  • Higher rates of part-time and casual work
  • Career interruptions due to parental leave and caring duties
  • Occupational segregation, where women are overrepresented in lower-paying industries
  • Limited access to leadership roles and promotions
  • Bias and discrimination in hiring, pay negotiations, and workplace policies

Another revealing factor in the wealth gap is property ownership. Among Gen Z Australians, 48% of men own a home compared to just 33% of women. Furthermore, 18% of Gen Z men own their home outright—double the 9% of women in the same cohort. For millennials, the disparity continues. While men and women are almost equally likely to have a mortgage (45% vs 43%), men are 50% more likely to own their home outright (15% vs 10%). Given that property is one of the most significant wealth-building assets in Australia, the lower homeownership rates among women have long-term financial implications.

Beyond property, investment trends also play a role. Studies have consistently shown that men are more likely to invest in equities and take on higher-risk, higher-return investments. Women, by contrast, tend to favour lower-risk assets, which, over time, can result in lower overall returns.

Let’s dive into what the wealth gap looks like across different life stages.

Childhood and adolescence

Recent findings from Finder’s Parenting Report suggest that boys receive more pocket money than girls, earning an average of $10.30 per week compared to $7.50. Over a year, that’s a difference of $145.60. Boys tend to be paid for outdoor chores like mowing the lawn, while girls are expected to complete unpaid “indoor” work, such as tidying up. Experts also note fathers are more likely to discuss money with their sons, while mothers talk to their daughters about financial matters with less confidence.

Interestingly, the biggest gender gap in superannuation balances occurs in adolescence, with the average young male holding $11,710 in super, while the average young female has just $7,455—a difference of 57%. A closer look at employment data reveals why; young men are more likely to work in full-time roles or enter trades straight out of school, whereas young women are more likely to pursue higher education. Finder’s Consumer Sentiment Tracker shows that 25% of 18–20-year-old men have a full-time job, compared to just 15% of women.

Studying/starting a career

According to QILT data, salaries between men and women within six months of finishing university remain close, with male graduates earning just 2% more than their female counterparts. Yet within three years, this pay gap widens to 10%. What causes this shift? While industry selection plays a role (with more men entering higher-paying fields like engineering), differences in salary negotiation and career advancement opportunities may also be contributing factors.

Finder’s research highlights that men are more likely to request a pay rise, with 24% of men negotiating for higher wages compared to just 14% of women. Even when both genders ask for a raise, men receive an average pay bump of $4,000, whereas women receive just $2,424—almost half. Additionally, men are 33% more likely to actually receive the pay rise they request, according to the report “Do Women Ask?”.

Participation at senior levels – and receiving commensurate pay – is a complex topic, but with simple data points. The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) reports that while women make up 51% of the workforce, they hold only 32.5% of key management positions and just 19.4% of CEO roles. Are women not in senior roles because of that common argument that men are better negotiation capabilities? Or is it a lack of opportunity in certain industries? Or intrinsic bias from hiring managers? Perhaps a combination of all these but consequently, women, on average, retire with significantly less wealth than men.

Motherhood and early career

A generation ago, having children didn’t carry the same financial weight it does today. With the rising cost of living and the need for dual incomes, the decision to start a family now has lasting financial consequences—especially for women.

Finder’s report 'The State of Women’s Wealth' shows women continue to take the vast majority of parental leave, accounting for 83% of all primary carer leave used. Government support has increased in response; paid parental leave will rise to $23,810.80 over six months by July 2026, and for the first time, superannuation contributions will also be included. This will help reduce the long-term financial impact of career breaks, as women currently lose an estimated $4,580 in super contributions for each child which grows to $46,979 come retirement.


Split even: both partners take 6.45 months of annual leave and are paid for 2.2 months of this by their employer
Paid leave: women take 9.1 months of leave and are paid for 2.2 months of this by their employer
Unpaid leave: women take 9.1 months of leave and do not receive any paid leave from their employer
Source: Finder Consumer Sentiment Tracker

They also forego $4,906 of income, making it a total of $91,885 of superannuation they have missed out on by retirement. By contrast, men lose just $11,136 ($5,693 in superannuation come retirement + $5,442 in income lost).

Beyond lost wages, mothers continue to shoulder the bulk of unpaid household labour:

  • 34% of women say they handle almost all household duties, compared to just 10% of men
  • 63% of women take on at least 75% of the chores, while only 23% of men do the same
  • 12% of women say their careers have been impacted by household responsibilities, compared to just 6% of men

Career progression or midlife

Life between your mid-30s and mid-50s is a period of shifting responsibilities, evolving career paths and growing financial pressures. Many women in this stage juggle multiple roles—managing careers, raising children, and caring for aging parents—all while trying to build long-term financial security.

This stage of life sees women carrying a disproportionate share of unpaid caregiving. Australia has 2.65 million unpaid carers, and 72% of primary carers are women. This caregiving burden, combined with part-time work and career interruptions, significantly impacts women’s earnings, superannuation balances, and long-term wealth.

Women’s financial setbacks become increasingly apparent in midlife. While superannuation gender gaps are slowly improving, the latest ATO data (from 2021) shows that the average super balance for women was $150,922, compared to $189,892 for men—a gap of 20.5%.

'The State of Women’s Wealth' also highlights how this gap extends beyond super:

  • 48% of women have less super than they expected at this stage of life (vs. 38% of men)
  • 57% of women have less savings than expected (vs. 41% of men)
  • 52% of women earn less than they thought they would (vs. 37% of men)
  • 48% of women feel behind in their career progression (vs. 34% of men)
  • 46% of women feel behind in home ownership (vs. 33% of men)

These individual setbacks contribute to the $51.8 billion annual cost of the gender pay gap to the Australian economy, according to WGEA. One major driver of women’s lower lifetime earnings is part-time work. WGEA data shows that 29.7% of women work part-time, compared to just 10.8% of men. More women are also employed casually, meaning fewer benefits and lower super contributions.

Over 50

Women over 50 often continue to feel the pressures of the 'sandwich generation', as well personal upheavals and career shifts. They tend to fall into two broad categories; either they are looking to upskill, seek promotions, or invest to secure their retirement. Or, particularly those experiencing separation or divorce, are rebuilding from scratch.

For a rising number of women, financial setbacks in later life are leading to far greater consequences—particularly homelessness.

  • One-third of all divorces (30.7%) are granted to women aged 50+
  • Older women are the fastest-growing group experiencing homelessness in Australia
  • 31% increase in women over 55 experiencing homelessness from 2011 to 2016, with a further 6.6% rise by 2021
  • Homelessness among older women has grown almost 40% in a decade (2011–2021)

This crisis is driven by a combination of low super balances, part-time work, career interruptions, and the gender pay gap, compounded by rising living costs, an unaffordable rental market, and age discrimination in employment.

Research shows that certain factors significantly increase the risk of homelessness for women over 55:

  • 28% of women in private rentals are at risk
  • 34% of women not employed full-time are at risk
  • 65% of single mothers are at risk
  • 85% of women with a history of financial insecurity face a high risk

Retirement

The average woman would have to add an extra $236 per month into her superannuation fund, or alternatively, work an extra 11 years, in order to retire with the same super balance as the average man.

The Government, the ATO, various super funds all recognise women retire with 25% less superannuation, on average, than men (according to ASFA), in addition to having lower overall savings. This financial disparity places many women at a higher risk of economic insecurity in their later years, with 1 in 3 single women over 60 living in income poverty.

Finder research reveals that 35% of women aged 65 or older have less than $1,000 saved, compared to just 22% of men. Of those women aged 65 and older who do have savings, the average balance is around $46,650, while men in the same age bracket have an average of $67,920 – representing a 46% difference.

Conclusion

It’s important to celebrate the progress we’ve made. Yet, it’s still not enough. As 'The State of Women’s Wealth' clearly shows, women continue to have less wealth than men, simply because of their gender. The more we talk about the challenges facing women’s wealth and the opportunities for change, the more we learn, grow and overcome. As one teaches one… one becomes many.

 

Pascale Helyar-Moray OAM was one of the contributors to the Finder report. She's also the founder of Grow My Money, a platform where members can shop with scores of major Australian brands and receive a cashback into their superannuation account. She's the author of the book, Rich Woman Poor Woman.

 

9 Comments
Steve
April 21, 2025

But after the Divorce, the wife often ends up with 70% & the bloke ends up with 30%. Plus after the funeral, the wife ends up with 100%. Let's provide the full picture on this issue.

Pascale Helyar-Moray
April 25, 2025

Steve, can you provide the data source for this claim that women 'often' end up with 70%? If that were the case, then very few women would be retiring in poverty - but we know that 1 in 6 women does. Typically the 70/30 split happens where there are significant financial disparities between the couple ie one partner has brought significantly more financially to the table OR will have a significantly lower earning capacity after the divorce.

If you're talking about a couple still together (1 in 2) where she might end up with 100%...the average life expectancy of a man in Australia is 81, for a woman it's 85. Typically there isn't a lot left in the pot for her to have 100% after the funeral; ASFA stats say that there's around $166k as a median balance for men aged 75+

Jason
April 18, 2025

As a single dad who took time off and worked part time to try raise the kids in a fairer and healthier way, the long term outcomes seem random and not purely based on one's sex. If the relationship continues it doesn't really matter who made the money as it is a joint resource for both parents and the kids. The trouble really comes during separation and who wins financially seems to come down to fortunate timing or luck, who has the most family support, or sadly who is able to engage the cleverest lawyers. Much to some mens (and women's) annoyance all super is now divvied up, even defined benefit pensions are split. I think it's a different story when we are talking about women who are either long term single, or split from a childless long term relationship who have to resort to civil courts to get fair dispensation. You hear some sad stories of many women who have moved in and lived in their partners houses for many years, effectively paying market rent and are suddenly booted out with no compensation but are too nice or too poor to take it to court. In these scenarios the power is in the hands of the wealthier partner who statistically speaking would be the man in a heterosexual relationship. The primary factor is relative incomes eg construction versus nursing, both difficult and dirty jobs with a big pay differential. And confidence. Clearly in this society women are generally less confident than men for a range of reasons and this should be fixed.

Pascale Helyar-Moray
April 25, 2025

Thanks for this Jason. Certainly it's true that the 'system' (particularly super) wasn't designed for the parent who takes time out of the workforce; 12% of those who take parental leave are male - so you're certainly in the minority. It's only in the last few years that we've started to see a shift in policy towards a more balanced outcome - eg paying super on parental leave.
Fully agree that a lot of the problems come down to what happens when there's a separation; and with 1 in 2 marriages (inc de facto) ending in divorce, that's a very big number of problems. Absolutely - whoever has the biggest chequebook (usually him) wins.

Cam
April 17, 2025

If women taking time out of the workforce to raise kids is causing a wealth gap, maybe don't do it. Personally I think either parent wishing to work reduced hours or stay at home until kids reach school is great. Its your life and your choices. But I keep reading articles saying its the biggest cause of differing wealth, and that is a problem.
I get that some of the differences in caregiving is based on some couples or at least males, viewing it as the female role. In many others though its a choice, and the people making the choice are aware of the financial implications.
I see again the statistics about men and women at 65 and in retirement, while frustratingly the policy ideas to change this all seem to be aimed at people under 40. Can we please have a policy idea that helps older women? If there's no plan to help anyone over 40, you can't complain about the wealth differences for at least 25 years as you're not trying to address it.

Neil
April 18, 2025

Perhaps $ alone is not the unit of measurement for a happy life. For those women, who have taken a hit on their $ wealth through the lifestyle choices THEY have made, perhaps a balanced scorecard approach is required – one that includes measures of happiness (eg. the quality of the child/ren they have raised by taking time out of the workforce rather than sending their offspring to be tended to by babysitters at a childcare centre, the pleasure they received in looking after their ageing parents rather than sending them to a dispassionate nursing home, etc).

Lorraine Yeomans
April 21, 2025

Really? Get real.

lyn
April 21, 2025

Neil, agree re not $ / measurement of a happy life having seen both sides of coin, missing much of a child in childcare and not missing the second. Can attest years later the difference each decision made and which was better decision for long term. As saying goes, one can't have it all. Suppose there are studies about effect of fulltime care for kids or not, but to me it'd be a study of the unknown. One can't know outcomes until years later for obvious reasons. Of course, many parents don't have a choice. I'm with Cam above for policies to help those over 40 so there can be choice for home responsibility in early years, whether female or male. Virginia Tapscott, journalist but stay at home Mum of 4, has written several insightful articles for The Australian, some 'outside the box' ideas for catch-up.

Pascale Helyar-Moray
April 25, 2025

Cam, if you keep reading articles saying that time out of the workforce to raise kids is causing a wealth gap for women...there must be something to it?

Yes, historical roles attributed to women as the 'caregiver' role are part of the issue. However, a woman also faces cultural, social and other norms - which mean that it's not a straightforward choice to simply 'not have kids.' This is part of the challenge - there is no education (informal or formal) that outlines to any couple intending to have kids what the financial implications will be for their income, their super and even the dynamics within a relationship.

You're right; there is not a lot of policy talk targeting older women. You might want to listen to this podcast by the Older Women's Network on this topic https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/homeless-women-over-50/105181086

I'm not following your comment on why we shouldn't be able to raise awareness of the gender wealth gap for those between 40 and 65. Clearly, the research shows these age groups are impacted to. And if it means that even one Firstlinks reader is aware of the gender wealth gap when it comes to their mother / sister / daughter / niece / friend - and takes action - then it's worth having made 'the complaint'

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Australia’s shameful super gap

Why women are most hurt by financial pandemic

How to improve retirement outcomes for women

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Investment strategies

Don't let Trump derail your wealth creation plans

If you want to build wealth over the long-term, trying to guess the stock market's next move is generally a bad idea. In a month where this might be more tempting than ever, here is what you should focus on instead.

Economics

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Investment strategies

Will China's EV boom end in tears?

China's EV dominance is reshaping global auto markets - but with soaring tariffs, overcapacity, and rising scrutiny, the industry’s meteoric rise may face a turbulent road ahead. Can China maintain its lead - or will it stall?

Investment strategies

REITs: a haven in a Trumpian world?

Equity markets have been lashed by Trump's tariff policies, yet REITs have outperformed. Not only are they largely unaffected by tariffs, but they offer a unique combination of growth, sound fundamentals, and value.

Shares

Why Europe is back on the global investor map

European equities are surging ahead of the U.S this year, driven by strong earnings, undervaluation, and fiscal stimulus. With quality founder-led firms and a strengthening Euro, Europe may be the next global investment hotspot.

Chalmers' disingenuous budget claims

The Treasurer often touts a $207 billion improvement in Australia's financial position. A deeper look at the numbers reveals something less impressive, caused far more by commodity price surprises than policy.

Fixed interest

Duration: Friend or foe in a defensive allocation?

Duration is back. After years in the doghouse, shifting markets and higher yields are restoring its role as a reliable diversifier and income source - offering defensive strength in today’s uncertain environment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.