Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 168

Three risk measures provide a fuller LIC picture

Historical returns can be a good guide when evaluating the merits of a Listed Investment Company (LIC). However, investment performance represents only one side of the risk-reward equation. Investors also need to factor in the risk metrics when assessing a LIC, such as the following three:

  • Beta
  • Standard deviation
  • Sharpe Ratio

Beta

Beta measures the magnitude of a LIC’s movement relative to its benchmark. A beta measurement of 1 conveys that the LIC is moving in line with its benchmark. A beta of less than 1 indicates it is less volatile than its benchmark, and a beta of more than 1 suggests that the LIC is more volatile than the benchmark.

For example, if a LIC has a beta of 1.1 in relation to the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries, then the LIC historically has been 10% more volatile than the index. Therefore, if the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries has gained 10%, with everything else being equal, the LIC would be expected to have gained 11% (10% x 1.1). The reverse is true if the index has fallen.

In the graph below, we calculate some LIC’s five-year share price beta. Overall, the graph suggests that the share price movement of the LIC is lower than the market. This also suggests that the inherent active nature of a LIC would be a good addition to an investment portfolio to smooth out long-term volatility.

Five Year Share Price Beta

Other observations from the graph:

  • LICs within the Large Capitalisation and the Large to Medium Capitalisation mandate have a beta largely between 0.6x-0.9x compared with the market. This suggests that, with the right LIC, an investor could achieve the same performance as the market with less risk.
  • All the Wilson Asset Management LICs (ASX: WAM, WAX and WAA) have a beta of less than 0.5x due to their historically high portfolio weighting in cash.
  • Australian Leaders Fund (ASX: ALF) and Cadence Capital (ASX:CDM) have low betas due to their ability to short investments in comparison to their benchmark.

Standard deviation

Standard deviation is a statistical measurement of historical volatility and is the most common definition of risk. It measures a LIC’s dispersion of investment return from its historical average. A larger standard deviation indicates higher volatility.

We use the pre-tax net tangible assets (NTA) as our data point to assess the standard deviation. The pre-tax NTA represents a better measure of a LIC’s investment performance.

The graph below reflects the pre-tax NTA performance of LICs over the past five years. This is reflected by its position along the horizontal, with LICs further to the right achieving higher returns. The graph also highlights the standard deviation of the LIC’s pre-tax NTA performance. This is reflected by each LIC’s positon along the vertical axis, with more volatile LICs positioned higher on the graph.

Pre-Tax NTA Performance Standard Deviation vs Pre-Tax NTA Performance

Other observations from the graph:

  • Century Australia Investments (ASX:CYA) and Australian United Investment (ASX:AUI) have domestic investment mandates but slightly higher risk profiles than the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index.
  • Diversified United Investments (ASX: DUI) also has a higher risk profile due to its holding international exchange traded funds (ETFs) in its underlying portfolio.
  • The majority of LICs have a lower standard deviation than the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index, of 12.6%, and nearly half of these LICs outperformed this index.
  • Wilson Asset Management LICs (ASX: WAM, WAX & WAA) attributes its low standard deviation to holding a significant amount of cash.
  • Magellan Flagship Fund (ASX: MFF) has been the best performing International LIC on a risk-adjusted perspective.

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe Ratio reflects the ratio of all excess returns over the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation. The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better the LIC’s performance in proportion to the risk it’s taken. A LIC with a negative Sharpe Ratio would suggest that a risk-free asset (example, government bond) would be a better investment.

The graph below shows the Sharpe Ratio of some LIC’s investment performance over the past five years.

Five Year Pre-Tax NTA Sharpe Ratio

Key notes from the graph above are:

  • Large market cap LICs and large-to-medium cap LICs have an average Sharpe Ratio of 0.36x, which is also the ratio for the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index.
  • International-focussed LICs have outperformed risk-free assets over the past five years.

Conclusion

The return is only one side of the investment equation. Investors also must be aware of the risk they are assuming to achieve those returns before they can make an informed judgement when comparing LICs.

These three metrics do not tell the complete story. However, they should be used together with historical return, and qualitative factors such as investment philosophy, management experience and the cost of running the LIC. Together, these factors will make investors far more informed when determining which LICs to add to their portfolios.

 

Nathan Umapathy is Research Analyst at Bell Potter Securities. This document has been prepared without consideration of any specific client’s investment objectives, financial situation or needs and there is no responsibility to inform you of any matter that subsequently may affect any of the information contained in this document.

For the latest Bell Potter Quarterly Report and Weekly NTA updates, click here.

 

  •   11 August 2016
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

The missing 30%: how LIC returns are understated, and why it matters

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.