Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 168

Three risk measures provide a fuller LIC picture

Historical returns can be a good guide when evaluating the merits of a Listed Investment Company (LIC). However, investment performance represents only one side of the risk-reward equation. Investors also need to factor in the risk metrics when assessing a LIC, such as the following three:

  • Beta
  • Standard deviation
  • Sharpe Ratio

Beta

Beta measures the magnitude of a LIC’s movement relative to its benchmark. A beta measurement of 1 conveys that the LIC is moving in line with its benchmark. A beta of less than 1 indicates it is less volatile than its benchmark, and a beta of more than 1 suggests that the LIC is more volatile than the benchmark.

For example, if a LIC has a beta of 1.1 in relation to the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries, then the LIC historically has been 10% more volatile than the index. Therefore, if the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries has gained 10%, with everything else being equal, the LIC would be expected to have gained 11% (10% x 1.1). The reverse is true if the index has fallen.

In the graph below, we calculate some LIC’s five-year share price beta. Overall, the graph suggests that the share price movement of the LIC is lower than the market. This also suggests that the inherent active nature of a LIC would be a good addition to an investment portfolio to smooth out long-term volatility.

Five Year Share Price Beta

Other observations from the graph:

  • LICs within the Large Capitalisation and the Large to Medium Capitalisation mandate have a beta largely between 0.6x-0.9x compared with the market. This suggests that, with the right LIC, an investor could achieve the same performance as the market with less risk.
  • All the Wilson Asset Management LICs (ASX: WAM, WAX and WAA) have a beta of less than 0.5x due to their historically high portfolio weighting in cash.
  • Australian Leaders Fund (ASX: ALF) and Cadence Capital (ASX:CDM) have low betas due to their ability to short investments in comparison to their benchmark.

Standard deviation

Standard deviation is a statistical measurement of historical volatility and is the most common definition of risk. It measures a LIC’s dispersion of investment return from its historical average. A larger standard deviation indicates higher volatility.

We use the pre-tax net tangible assets (NTA) as our data point to assess the standard deviation. The pre-tax NTA represents a better measure of a LIC’s investment performance.

The graph below reflects the pre-tax NTA performance of LICs over the past five years. This is reflected by its position along the horizontal, with LICs further to the right achieving higher returns. The graph also highlights the standard deviation of the LIC’s pre-tax NTA performance. This is reflected by each LIC’s positon along the vertical axis, with more volatile LICs positioned higher on the graph.

Pre-Tax NTA Performance Standard Deviation vs Pre-Tax NTA Performance

Other observations from the graph:

  • Century Australia Investments (ASX:CYA) and Australian United Investment (ASX:AUI) have domestic investment mandates but slightly higher risk profiles than the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index.
  • Diversified United Investments (ASX: DUI) also has a higher risk profile due to its holding international exchange traded funds (ETFs) in its underlying portfolio.
  • The majority of LICs have a lower standard deviation than the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index, of 12.6%, and nearly half of these LICs outperformed this index.
  • Wilson Asset Management LICs (ASX: WAM, WAX & WAA) attributes its low standard deviation to holding a significant amount of cash.
  • Magellan Flagship Fund (ASX: MFF) has been the best performing International LIC on a risk-adjusted perspective.

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe Ratio reflects the ratio of all excess returns over the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation. The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better the LIC’s performance in proportion to the risk it’s taken. A LIC with a negative Sharpe Ratio would suggest that a risk-free asset (example, government bond) would be a better investment.

The graph below shows the Sharpe Ratio of some LIC’s investment performance over the past five years.

Five Year Pre-Tax NTA Sharpe Ratio

Key notes from the graph above are:

  • Large market cap LICs and large-to-medium cap LICs have an average Sharpe Ratio of 0.36x, which is also the ratio for the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation Index.
  • International-focussed LICs have outperformed risk-free assets over the past five years.

Conclusion

The return is only one side of the investment equation. Investors also must be aware of the risk they are assuming to achieve those returns before they can make an informed judgement when comparing LICs.

These three metrics do not tell the complete story. However, they should be used together with historical return, and qualitative factors such as investment philosophy, management experience and the cost of running the LIC. Together, these factors will make investors far more informed when determining which LICs to add to their portfolios.

 

Nathan Umapathy is Research Analyst at Bell Potter Securities. This document has been prepared without consideration of any specific client’s investment objectives, financial situation or needs and there is no responsibility to inform you of any matter that subsequently may affect any of the information contained in this document.

For the latest Bell Potter Quarterly Report and Weekly NTA updates, click here.

 

  •   11 August 2016
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

It’s time for LICs to die

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

The missing 30%: how LIC returns are understated, and why it matters

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.