Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 177

US shares at new highs, but where's Australia?

US share prices have been doing well this year. The broad market indexes have reached new all-time highs, finally topping their previous peaks at the top of the 1990s ‘dot com’ boom and the 2000s credit boom.

The chart below shows four of the main US market indexes over the past four decades.

This shows that the current boom is not confined to just a few ‘hot stocks’, but enjoyed by the whole market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average measures the prices of just 30 of the largest stocks including Apple, Microsoft, IBM, McDonalds, Coca-Cola and Disney. The S&P 500 index covers 500 large and mid-sized companies, and the Wilshire 5000 index covers 5000 companies including thousands of small and micro stocks. The NASDAQ composite is heavily weighted toward technology companies.

The stock market boom in the US has been driven by two main factors: low interest rates and the global smart phone revolution. However, the US Federal Reserve turned off the ‘QE’ tap in 2014 and started raising interest rates in December 2015. The US government has also been tightening fiscal policy in recent years with progressively lower budget deficits. So the boom is overcoming the twin headwinds of tightening monetary and fiscal policies.

The main driving force has been the global technology revolution. The smart phone is changing how billions of people in virtually every country on the planet go about their daily lives. New technology is also revolutionising how businesses operate, from cloud computing to inventory management to accounting.

All of this requires new hardware and software. Factory workers in low wage countries build the hardware out of rocks dug up from quarries like Australia. But the real money is in the know-how and software and those come mostly from American companies. The American economy may be struggling to get back to normal growth but American companies are leading the global technology revolution.

Australian versus US shares

US shares have beaten Australian shares handsomely over the past five years despite Australia enjoying stronger economic growth and population growth.

The US S&P500 Price Index is 40% above its 2007 high, and with dividends, it is 70% above. The Total Return series after US inflation is 48% above 2007 highs. But the Australian All Ords Price Index is still 18% below its 2007 highs. With dividends it is 20% above, but the Total Return series after local inflation is still 2% below the peak (these numbers are to end September 2016).

A better comparison is an Australian investor in Australian shares after Australian inflation versus the same Australian investor in US shares after Australian inflation (that is, an Australian investor can chose to invest in either Australian shares or US shares but suffers Australian inflation either way). Then US shares Total Returns less Australian inflation is +66% since 2007 high versus -2% for Australian shares. The difference is the currency effect of a falling AUD and higher inflation here than in the US. Investors tend to ignore inflation when comparing long-term performance.

Here is the longer term picture.

Both markets have returned average real total returns (including dividends and after CPI inflation) of 6.5% per year since 1900. While the real total returns have been the same, the components of returns have been different. Australian shares have delivered higher nominal price growth and higher dividend yields than US shares, but these benefits have been neutralised by Australia’s higher inflation rate, so the net real total returns after inflation have been the same in both markets.

The two markets have also followed different paths along the way. The next chart shows the accumulated real total returns from both markets – green for Australia and red for the US.

The lower section shows when Australia was winning (positive green bars) and when the US was winning (negative red bars). Both markets have risen in global booms and then fallen in the global busts, but Australia and the US have taken turns in having bigger booms and busts.

Starting from the right side of the chart we see that Australia had a bigger 2000s boom than the US, and so it suffered worse in the 2008 bust. On the other hand, the US had a much bigger ‘dot com’ boom in the late 1990s, so it had a more severe ‘tech wreck’ in 2001 and 2002. Australia had a much bigger mid 1980s ‘entrepreneurial’ boom (Bond, Skase, Herscue, Elliott, Connell and the rest), and so it had further to fall in the 1987 crash. And so it goes back through history.

The fact that the US market has been winning in recent years is more a reflection of our bigger 2000s boom and our bigger bust in the GFC. Australia and the US both had a credit boom in the 2000s but Australia also had a mining boom that crashed as well, and it is still recovering.

So it is America’s turn, and we are seeing it already with the US clearly leading the global technology boom.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at independent advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. These past returns are not an indication of future returns.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Buy the dips?

The ASX is full of old, stodgy, low-growth companies

5 big calls for 2024

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.