Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 229

Value beyond the hype in US infrastructure

Following the election of Donald Trump, global infrastructure investors turned their attention to the US in expectation of a transformative plan for infrastructure investment, which is yet to materialise.

The past 10 to 15 years in the US infrastructure market have been disappointing despite the scale of the market and its well-recognised need for investment. Given the current model of using municipal or state funding for most infrastructure, the opportunities available to institutional investors have been limited and the market has remained stagnant. Therefore, it isn’t a surprise that one of Donald Trump’s proposed changes – the business-friendly infrastructure projects fuelling the equity rally – haven’t yet come to fruition. In fact, it feels familiar: Barack Obama also came to office with an infrastructure expansion plan, and it was swiftly sidelined.

Nevertheless, it feels like US infrastructure’s moment has arrived. Trump’s appointment came quite late into our own US infrastructure ambitions. AMP Capital has a strong infrastructure presence in the UK, Europe, and Australasia (in countries that largely have a successful tradition of public investment in infrastructure). We felt that the US was the last bastion for us. Our recent acquisition of ITS ConGlobal, the railroad services and logistics provider, is a product of our decision to buy and actively manage mid-market infrastructure assets in the US. We seek resilient assets that can be bought and managed regardless of the political climate.

Structural change in US infrastructure

Whatever happens on the policy front, there is a gradual structural change underway. US infrastructure is severely underinvested and many assets are in noticeably poor condition. The G20’s Global Infrastructure Hub forecasts that $12 trillion needs to be invested in US infrastructure by 2040 and there is currently an estimated $3.8 trillion ‘funding gap’ for the maintenance and development required. Institutional investors are likely to be a source of this required capital.

While federal policy is tricky to predict, we have more confidence in the macroeconomic picture. We are bullish on US GDP over the next five to seven years, and a great way for allocators to gain exposure to this trend is to invest in infrastructure assets with a strong correlation to US GDP. From a portfolio construction perspective, we have been looking to add US GDP exposure.

Avoid core, but embrace core-plus

Given the investor focus on the US infrastructure market and the lack of opportunities available, the market is competitive. So-called ‘core’ infrastructure assets are the traditional investment route: tollways, roads, gas utilities, ports. Large public assets traded mostly between asset owners such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, coveted for their predictable earnings over decade-long periods, are rare and highly competitive. This is especially so in the US due to its less-established public private partnerships model. Aside from buying well, there’s usually not a great deal an owner can do to improve the modest inflation-linked investment returns. They can be worth their high valuations for certain institutional investors seeking liability-matching returns.

Avoiding the high competition for core assets and their restricted return profile, we prefer assets that meet our definition of ‘core plus’ infrastructure. They have many of the same attributes as core infrastructure – high barriers to entry and a stable cash flow profile, within the sector of essential services – but they are not actually a core asset such as a port or railroad. ITS ConGlobal is an example. It’s a service-based business that handles container lifting between various modes of transport like rail, truck, and ship. It is outside the definition of core infrastructure, but shares many of its advantages.

While we are cautiously optimistic about the opportunities in US infrastructure, discipline is essential. We identified the investment opportunity in ITS ConGlobal more than two years before we acquired it last month. We expect to add exposure to US GDP given our read of future economic trends, with more value in the mid-markets than in higher profile assets.

 

Dylan Foo is Head of Americas, Infrastructure Equity at AMP Capital, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Trump’s tariff proposals benefit global infrastructure

Asia: bull or bear in the Year of the Goat

The prospects for investors in India

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.