Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 229

Value beyond the hype in US infrastructure

Following the election of Donald Trump, global infrastructure investors turned their attention to the US in expectation of a transformative plan for infrastructure investment, which is yet to materialise.

The past 10 to 15 years in the US infrastructure market have been disappointing despite the scale of the market and its well-recognised need for investment. Given the current model of using municipal or state funding for most infrastructure, the opportunities available to institutional investors have been limited and the market has remained stagnant. Therefore, it isn’t a surprise that one of Donald Trump’s proposed changes – the business-friendly infrastructure projects fuelling the equity rally – haven’t yet come to fruition. In fact, it feels familiar: Barack Obama also came to office with an infrastructure expansion plan, and it was swiftly sidelined.

Nevertheless, it feels like US infrastructure’s moment has arrived. Trump’s appointment came quite late into our own US infrastructure ambitions. AMP Capital has a strong infrastructure presence in the UK, Europe, and Australasia (in countries that largely have a successful tradition of public investment in infrastructure). We felt that the US was the last bastion for us. Our recent acquisition of ITS ConGlobal, the railroad services and logistics provider, is a product of our decision to buy and actively manage mid-market infrastructure assets in the US. We seek resilient assets that can be bought and managed regardless of the political climate.

Structural change in US infrastructure

Whatever happens on the policy front, there is a gradual structural change underway. US infrastructure is severely underinvested and many assets are in noticeably poor condition. The G20’s Global Infrastructure Hub forecasts that $12 trillion needs to be invested in US infrastructure by 2040 and there is currently an estimated $3.8 trillion ‘funding gap’ for the maintenance and development required. Institutional investors are likely to be a source of this required capital.

While federal policy is tricky to predict, we have more confidence in the macroeconomic picture. We are bullish on US GDP over the next five to seven years, and a great way for allocators to gain exposure to this trend is to invest in infrastructure assets with a strong correlation to US GDP. From a portfolio construction perspective, we have been looking to add US GDP exposure.

Avoid core, but embrace core-plus

Given the investor focus on the US infrastructure market and the lack of opportunities available, the market is competitive. So-called ‘core’ infrastructure assets are the traditional investment route: tollways, roads, gas utilities, ports. Large public assets traded mostly between asset owners such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, coveted for their predictable earnings over decade-long periods, are rare and highly competitive. This is especially so in the US due to its less-established public private partnerships model. Aside from buying well, there’s usually not a great deal an owner can do to improve the modest inflation-linked investment returns. They can be worth their high valuations for certain institutional investors seeking liability-matching returns.

Avoiding the high competition for core assets and their restricted return profile, we prefer assets that meet our definition of ‘core plus’ infrastructure. They have many of the same attributes as core infrastructure – high barriers to entry and a stable cash flow profile, within the sector of essential services – but they are not actually a core asset such as a port or railroad. ITS ConGlobal is an example. It’s a service-based business that handles container lifting between various modes of transport like rail, truck, and ship. It is outside the definition of core infrastructure, but shares many of its advantages.

While we are cautiously optimistic about the opportunities in US infrastructure, discipline is essential. We identified the investment opportunity in ITS ConGlobal more than two years before we acquired it last month. We expect to add exposure to US GDP given our read of future economic trends, with more value in the mid-markets than in higher profile assets.

 

Dylan Foo is Head of Americas, Infrastructure Equity at AMP Capital, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Trump’s tariff proposals benefit global infrastructure

Asia: bull or bear in the Year of the Goat

The prospects for investors in India

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Five stock recoveries not hanging on COVID predictions

The focus on predicting the recovery from the pandemic is the wrong emphasis. Better to identify great companies benefitting from market changes over a three- to five-year horizon with or without COVID.

Peak to peak, which LIC managers performed during COVID?

A comprehensive review of dozens of LICs shows how they performed in the crucial 'peak to peak' of COVID. This 14 months tested the mettle and strategies of a sector often under fire, with many strong results.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Blink and you missed a seismic shift in these stocks

Blink and it happened. If announcements in this sector were made by a producer of iron ore, gas, copper or some new tech, the news would have been splashed across the front pages. Have we witnessed a major change?

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Latest Updates

Shares

Platinum’s four guiding investment principles

Buying mispriced stocks is often uncomfortable when companies are outside the spotlight and markets are driven by emotions. And it's inescapable that the price paid ultimately determines the end result.

Interviews

Andrew Lockhart on corporate loans as an income alternative

Loans to corporates were the traditional domain of banks, but as investors look for income alternatives to term deposits, funds have combined hundreds of loans into a single structure to create a diversified investment.

Retirement

10 things I learned in my faux-retirement

Pre-retirees should ‘trial run’ their retirements. All those things you want to do - play golf, time with the family, a hobby, write a book - might not be so appealing in reality, but you might discover other benefits.

Retirement

Achieving a sufficient retirement income portfolio

Retirees require a reliable income stream to replace the wages they received when they were working and should focus on the dollar income generated over time rather than the headline yield percentage.

'Wealth of Experience' podcast and ASA webinar on ETFs v LICs

Peter reveals some top stock picks with an emphasis on long-term assets like Sydney Airport, Graham discusses spending in retirement and valuing assets, the key to Amazon, guest Andrew Lockhart and plenty more.

Strategy

Lucy Turnbull’s three lessons on leadership and successful careers

From promoting women to boost culture to taking opportunities as they arise, Lucy Turnbull AO says markets should not drive decision-making and leaders must live and breathe the company's mission and values.

Economy

Are concerns about inflation inflated?

While REITs and some value stocks are considered 'inflation-sensitive' assets, the data provide little support that they are good inflation hedges, and energy stocks and commodities are too volatile. So what works?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.