Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 150

The value opportunity in Australian equity

Two interrelated topics have been occupying much of our thoughts in recent months. The first is the deep discount currently available in many areas of the market, including in energy and mining stocks. The second is the underperformance of ‘value’ as an investment style over recent years.

The opportunity in resources

The current valuations of some of the major resources stocks present an opening to buy high-quality companies at levels well below our assessment of their intrinsic worth. The major miners represent value even with commodity prices expected to be lower for a considerable period.

We were resources ‘bears’ at the height of the commodity boom, but since then there has been dramatic de-ratings of commodity share prices. In 2010, resources companies were significantly overpriced, but this has since reversed due to a dramatic decline in resources prices relative to the S&P/ASX 200 Index.

In our valuation process we calculate a fair value for all stocks. This fair value is calculated over three years, assuming all stocks trade at our valuation in three years’ time. Using our methodology in 2010, we estimated that resources stocks were almost two and half times overvalued. Today, however, this same is trading at a 33% discount to fair value.

Or looking at it another way, as of the end of January 2016, the approximate 11% weight of resources in the Index is the lowest in 50 years (we have adjusted the financial weight to allow for the listings of CBA, AMP and IAG and added in Telstra, but not adjusted for changes in News Corp, to make the comparison as meaningful as possible). Even allowing for the bounce in March 2016, resources are still trading at the lower end of the historical ranges today.

Does this low resources weight not only reflect cycle low prices, but also the declining importance of mining in a more diversified economy? In reality, the reverse is actually true, in the sense that from 1967 to today mining exports as a percent of GDP have risen, particularly over the last ten years, as Asian demand has grown faster than the local economy.

Not all miners are created equal

Within the resources sector, we currently favour large diversified miners with cost advantages. In contrast, companies with high cost structures or high leverage may face greater stress during the post-China boom downturn. Junior miners and mining services companies generally have both higher debt levels and more volatile earnings.

This view is not based on any recovery or strong bounce-back in commodity prices. We have factored in the next couple of years of severely depressed commodity prices followed by a reversion to long-term equilibrium. The major miners remain cheap even if commodity prices remain lower for longer.

However, the major miners represent just a small part of the overall opportunity set. The kind of valuation distortion we have highlighted is available in other sectors and with other companies as well. We believe we are in an unusual period of history where the market is not focusing on ‘value’.

Valuation matters, now more than ever

For the purpose of illustrating this point, we will define ‘value’ as low price/book value stocks, and ‘growth’ as high price/book value. Put simply, ‘book value’ is a company’s assets minus its liabilities, broadly giving the equity value or net worth of the business.

Historically, over the long term, buying companies based on cheap valuations has led to better returns. Since 1927, the cumulative return of the lowest 30% price/book value US stocks (a common measure to assess the cheapest stocks) has been 16 times higher than those with the highest valuations (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1 - Value outperforms growth in the long run

PH Figure1 080416

PH Figure1 080416

 

Source: Kenneth French, Lazard. For the period July 1926 to November 2015 using data defined in Kenneth French’s library.

However, in recent years, in a reversal of the long-term historical trend, cheap securities (or companies with high dividend yield, low price-to-earnings multiples, or low price-to-book ratios) have significantly underperformed expensive securities in Australia and around the world. Investors seem to have prioritised possible earnings growth and recent positive market performance (driven by momentum factors) over traditional value fundamentals.

Bouncing back

The good news for value investors is that while there are periods when value can underperform the market, it has always bounced back. In fact, historically, the best periods for value investing have been in the years following poor value returns.

In the recession year of 1990, the market sold down cyclical stocks to very low levels, which led to a long period of high value returns during the recovery. From 1998 to March 2000 the market inflated the prices of tech stocks and sold down so-called ‘old economy’ stocks to low levels, setting up dramatic outperformance for valuation-driven investors over the next four to five years. By June 2008, the valuation of mining stocks reached high levels, and these mining stocks subsequently collapsed. The unravelling of these price distortions enabled many value managers to outperform their benchmarks by a considerable margin in the years that followed.

We believe this cycle will ultimately be no different. When value metrics return to favour, value managers should be well placed to benefit given the valuation discrepancies currently in the market.

A company’s valuation matters and it is going to matter even more after the market has ignored it for a considerable period of time. Making decisions that go against those of the market is not always easy, yet sometimes sentiment does give the long-term valuation-driven investor the investment equivalent of a long hop down the wicket for a cricketer. Now is one such time.

 

Dr. Philipp Hofflin is Portfolio Manager and Analyst in the Lazard Australian Equity Team. This article is general information and does not address the needs of any individual.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Invest in Australian value stocks before it is too late

Longest positive run for Australian shares since WWII

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.