Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 228

What’s currently the worst asset class investment?

Investing success is not just about picking the right asset class or securities, but also avoiding the poor investments. In the current global economic environment, out of the world’s major asset classes, global fixed rate bonds appear to have the lowest likely return over the next year or so.

Global bond yields are incredibly low

The rally in risk markets since the GFC has benefited from a major tailwind. Central bankers have delivered extraordinary monetary stimulus, despite the recovery in global economic growth and employment. They have remained resolutely accommodating to lift still unusually low rates of inflation.

As seen in the chart below, this has led to a decline in global bond yields – as represented by the prevailing yield on the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index – through the post-crisis global equity rally. The yield is now only around 1.6% p.a. This reflects very low bond yields around the world, with the yield on US, German and Japanese 10-year government bonds presently around 2.3%, 0.4% and 0% respectively. These bonds are an important component of most diversified investment portfolios around the world.

 

Source: Bloomberg. ‘Yield-to-worst’ for Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index. Shaded areas represent periods of significant equity market decline. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Given this bond index is comprised of fixed rate bonds (both government and corporate), the low yield means that even if interest rates don’t change further, the best annual return available from this Index is around 1.6% p.a. That’s not much compensation for the rate of inflation or for the volatility in capital returns on fixed rate bonds as interest rates fluctuate over time.

What’s more, depending on the period over which this Index is held and the speed of the change in market interest rates, returns may be even lower should, as seems likely, global bond yields eventually return to more normal levels.

Global bond values at risk of higher rates

As many investors know, the capital value or ‘price’ of fixed rate bonds moves inversely with movements in the level of interest rates. This sensitivity is greater, moreover, the longer the duration of the bonds in question. In the case of the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index, the average term-to-maturity of the bonds it contains is relatively long at around seven years. A 1% general rise in interest rates is estimated to produce a 7% decline in capital values.

Indeed, the ongoing decline in bond yields since the bottom of global equity markets in early 2009 has delivered investors, up until end-September 2017, a handy 7% p.a. return as measured by the global benchmark bond index. But while global central banks have been a boon to bond holders over recent years, the reverse is likely to be case over the next few years. Already the US Federal Reserve has started lifting official interest rates and will begin net reductions in its substantial bond holdings this month. The European Central Bank is also inching toward policy tightening, and is likely to announce in the next month or so a reduction in its bond buying programme for 2018.

By way of example, should the yield on the benchmark global bond index rise from say 1.6% p.a. to 2.6% p.a. over a given year, the implied total return from the Index (ignoring hedging costs) would be negative 5.4% (1.6% income return less 7% loss in capital value).  Even if such a rise in yields were to take place over two years, it would still imply negative annual returns over this period of around 2% p.a.

In short, when and if global bond yields start to rise, investors in the global bonds benchmark index should expect negative returns for a time. At the very least, given the ongoing recovery in global economic growth and corporate earnings, global bonds may well underperform other major asset classes such as local bonds, global and local equities and even many commodities over the next year or so.

Accordingly, at least in terms of major asset classes, in my view, longer-term fixed rate global bonds are currently potentially one of world’s worst investments.

Rising rates favour floating over fixed rate bonds

Given that local bond yields also tend to closely track global rates, rising bond yields would not be great news for the Australian fixed rate benchmark bond index, even if the Reserve Bank initially resists following other central banks in tightening policy. While the local Bloomberg AusBond Composite Bond Index might outperform the global benchmark, returns would still likely be low, and even potentially negative for a time. Indeed, in the year to end-September already, this Index produced a negative 0.7% return due to a rise in its average yield from 2% to 2.6%.

In this environment, Australian floating rate bonds should deliver a potentially better risk-return outcome than funds which aim to track the AusBond Composite. The floating rate exposure not only benefits from higher interest payments, it should not suffer the capital losses of fixed rate bonds if bond yields rise.

 

David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, which offers exchange traded products listed on the ASX. BetaShares is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article contains general information only and does not consider the investment circumstances of any individual. Floating Rate Bond ETFs are now available on the ASX, with BetaShares’ QPON being the largest.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Do bonds still offer a buffer to equity volatility?

5 lessons from the GFC as panic whips hybrids

How fixed interest is undergoing profound change

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.