Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 320

Why Grattan’s got it wrong on super

The Federal Treasurer recently announced a review of Australia’s retirement income system. While the scope and details of this review are not yet finalised, it is important at this early stage to challenge and correct some of the recent findings published by the Grattan Institute.

Grattan concludes that most Australians can look forward to a better living standard in retirement than they had while working. This conclusion is simply not true. Grattan has simplistically based its future modelling on a series of unrealistic assumptions that do not reflect the experiences of the average Australian.

A check on the assumptions

Take for example Grattan’s assumption that we are single when we retire. In fact, 70% of us have a partner, a factor crucial to assessing the amount of age pension received in retirement, particularly in the early years. In short, most people will not receive as much age pension as assumed by Grattan.

Grattan’s assumption that we will all work until the future pension eligibility age of 67 will also come as a shock to most Australians who retire a few years before the pension age and rely on their superannuation and other savings for income in these years.

And, what of the half of us who will live beyond 92 years, the age Grattan asserts we will no longer need retirement income, based on the average life expectancy for a 70-year-old in 2055? Grattan makes no allowance for regular income after that age.

For instance, Grattan bases its calculations on the average income received during the 25 years of retirement. Due to the wage indexation of the age pension, the real value of this income increases over time. This means that income in the early years of retirement is much lower than the figures quoted by Grattan.

Income replacement rates after work finishes

It concludes that the median income worker will have a net replacement rate (that is, the rate at which retirement income replaces earnings or income prior to retirement) of 89%, while the average full time income worker will have a net replacement rate of 78%, well above the objective of 70%. This is not a realistic scenario for most Australian households.

Mercer’s figures suggest that the median income workers will have a net replacement rate in the order of 68% of their previous income, while the average full-time earner will have a net replacement rate of only 58%. These figures hardly suggest that Australian retirees will have a better standard of living in retirement than while working, as asserted by Grattan.

These revised net replacement rates, which allow for the legislated increase in the Superannuation Guarantee to 12% of earnings, provide a much more realistic picture of the future for most Australians entering the workforce today. While the median-income earner may be able to maintain their previous standard of living based on the 70% benchmark, the average full-time earner will need to save additional funds, over and above compulsory superannuation, to maintain their previous standard of living throughout retirement.

One final point: Grattan suggests that future income from superannuation can be replaced by increased age pension payments, with savings to the Government. This ignores the very human need for retirees to sometimes access finances in case of unexpected events. Unforeseen incidents and costs do occur during the retirement years, including changes to the age pension. Given this, it is vital that retirees have access to some capital, which the age pension does not allow for. Superannuation and the age pension are not the same.

Importance of the retirement review

The forthcoming review is an opportunity to consider the wide range of situations faced by Australians as they approach retirement. We cannot assume that everyone is a home owner, is single, will retire at the pension age and will live to 92. Accepting that policy development must rely on future modelling, it needs to be more comprehensive than the single cameo used by Grattan.

The review must also consider the objectives of the whole retirement income system and not restrict itself to superannuation. We need to review the integration of the various pillars of financial security in retirement - the age pension, superannuation, voluntary saving and housing - so that the total system delivers improved outcomes for all Australians in a wide range of situations.

 

Dr David Knox is a Senior Partner at Mercer. See www.mercer.com.au. This article is general information and not investment advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Super performance test will destroy viability of some funds

How to give retirees the confidence to spend

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require trustees - even SMSFs - to offer a retirement income product to protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.