Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 163

How will the global slowdown in productivity affect investors?

Over the past decade, productivity growth has markedly declined. This slowing is significant – it’s global and it started before the global financial crisis threw the international economy off course.

Moreover, this slowdown has occurred at a time when the rapid pace of innovation and technological change was generally expected to turbo-charge productivity.

And there’s more to come. Productivity seems likely to decline in the US in 2016, while growth is tepid in other affluent countries.

Productivity measures the output of goods and services relative to the input that goes into their production. The often-quoted observation of Princeton University professor Paul Krugman is spot on:

“Productivity isn’t everything, but in the long-run it is almost everything. A country’s ability to improve its standard of living over time depends almost entirely on its ability to raise its output per worker.” 

Krugman could well have added that productivity growth is also the main source of returns for investors over the medium term and longer, and a sustained fall in productivity growth means a reduction in those returns.

In the short term, however, it can help reduce unemployment. The US, Germany, Australia and New Zealand are creating more jobs from small increases in GDP than they would have had productivity growth been stronger.

Productivity is difficult to measure

Alas, productivity is hard to measure: the numbers jump around from quarter to quarter, and are subject to wide revision. Let’s put those problems aside for now and follow the suggestion of Jeffrey Kleintop, chief global strategist with US broking group Charles Schwab:

“The focus for investors shouldn’t be on the exact number [for productivity growth], but instead on the general trend that productivity is lower now than in the past.”

Kleintop outlines five strategies to help investors cope with the diverse effects of the productivity slowdown.

  • The return of inflation. Low growth in productivity, if sustained, will probably result in output increasing at a slower rate than demand – and thereby contribute to the return of inflation. Share investors would need to focus on companies that can best pass on higher costs – and, I’d add, those with money in interest-bearing investments would likely be attracted to floating-rate debt and inflation-linked bonds.
  • Shortages of tax revenue. With tax receipts likely to grow much slower than outlays on welfare and health, governments will face additional budget strains and deepening worries over high debt levels. Over time, interest rates would push higher.
  • Emerging market growth. In general, emerging market economies will have fewer problems than developed economies in adjusting to the global productivity slowdown, as they have greater scope to boost productivity by adopting innovations already in place in developed-market economies.
  • Profit margin pressure. Low productivity growth generally means faster growth in labour costs, which can squeeze margins. Share investors may need to favour companies “that can more easily substitute technology for labour or are less exposed to labour costs as a percentage of total costs”.
  • Less creative destruction. The US could see fewer business start-ups as the result of the slowing in innovation and in adoption of new technologies.

There’s a view widely held by those involved in international technology hubs that the slowdown of growth in measured productivity mainly reflects the difficulties in calculating productivity – particularly in service industries, that have been keen adopters of new technologies. However, as New York University’s Nouriel Roubini notes:

“if this were true, one could argue that the mis-measure of productivity growth is more severe today than in past decades of technological innovation.”   

Slow productivity growth seems likely to be prolonged by the low levels of business investment most economies have experienced since the GFC. The risks, too, are that productivity growth is further constrained by the populist backlash against policies such as globalisation and market-based reforms. These policies offer the best prospects for raising the rate of productivity growth.

Investors, among others, have a lot at stake regarding how the global productivity crisis is resolved. If near-zero rates of productivity growth persist, long-term average returns on investments will disappoint, inflation will return, government finances will be even harder to balance, and cycles in the economy and investment markets will widen.

 

Don Stammer is a former director of investment strategy with Deutsche Bank Australia. He now writes a fortnightly column on investments for The Australian.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.