Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 284

8 hints for any SMSF in both accumulation and pension modes

The transfer balance cap applies from 1 July 2017 and places a $1.6 million limit per person on the amount of savings that can be moved into the tax-free retirement phase of superannuation.

This means retirees who have balances in excess of $1.6 million will likely have both a retirement phase pension and a non-retirement phase accumulation account unless they withdrew the excess from the superannuation system.

For some SMSF retirees, this may be the first time since moving into retirement that their fund has had an accumulation interest. It may also be the first time the fund has had a mix of pension and accumulation balances.

Here are eight things you need to think about when running an SMSF that is not solely in retirement phase due to the transfer balance cap.

1. Separate accounts for pension and accumulation

Where a member has both pension and accumulation accounts in the SMSF, the trustee must allocate fund income and expenses on a fair and reasonable basis between the two accounts and members in the fund. They also need to keep track of an accumulation account and a pension account balances for the members. This does not mean the trustee needs to allocate specific assets to belong to each member or account, and indeed, from a tax perspective the trustee is not allowed to segregate assets.

2. The fund may be eligible to claim a tax deduction on some fund expenses

General fund expenses that must be apportioned can only be claimed as a deduction in the annual return to the extent they were incurred in producing assessable income. Now the SMSF has an accumulation interest, it is likely to have assessable income and so the trustee may be eligible to claim part of those expenses as a deduction to offset taxable income in the annual return. A common industry approach is to use (1 – actuarial exempt income proportion) as the deductibility proportion. Tax Ruling 93/17 also provides another method and further information on apportioning expenses.

3. Capital losses can be carried forward

Capital gains and losses on assets solely supporting retirement phase income streams are generally disregarded. This means gains are exempt from tax but also that capital losses cannot be carried forward to offset future capital gains. Where an SMSF with an accumulation interest realises a capital loss that is first offset against any current year capital gains, and if the result is a net loss this can be carried forward to future years to offset against future gains.

4. Strategic thinking is required when taking benefit payments from the fund

When a payment is taken from the SMSF, the trustee will need to identify what interest the withdrawal was taken from, either pension or accumulation. There are pros and cons to each option:

 

  • A minimum payment must be made from each pension as a pension payment in order to meet the legal requirements of having an income stream eligible for an exemption from income tax. So at least one payment in the year needs to be a pension payment and it must be enough to meet the minimum payment standards.

 

 

  • Where a member wishes to draw above their minimum requirement in a year then they should consider taking that additional amount as a lump sum from their accumulation interest. This means a larger balance stays in the tax-free retirement phase, reducing the SMSFs future tax bills. For members under age 60 lump sums paid up to the lifetime low rate cap ($205,000 for 2018-19) are tax free.

 

 

  • Payments can also be taken as a lump sum payment from a retirement phase pension. This payment does not count towards minimum pension requirement and is treated as a lump sum for tax purposes. Lump sums paid from pension accounts will be debited form the individual’s transfer balance account, meaning more room under the $1.6 million cap if needed in the future (e.g. receiving a death benefit income stream). Lump sums paid from retirement phase pension must be reported under the transfer balance account reporting requirements.

 

 

5. Consider opportunities to even up retirement phase balances to reduce taxable accumulation interests in the fund

Each member in the SMSF has the lifetime transfer balance cap of $1.6 million. Where one member has a large balance which exceeded the $1.6 million cap resulting in an accumulation interest, but the other member has a balance in retirement phase under $1.6 million, consider moving some of those accumulation assets into retirement phase for the other member. The member would need to be eligible to make/receive contributions and consideration needs to be given to whether it is appropriate for the first member to give up their entitlement to those assets. That is, as part of the other member’s interest, those monies would be payable to their beneficiaries on death not those of the original member. But for some couples looking to maximise exempt income in their SMSF, this may be a strategy to help maximize the value of superannuation in retirement phase. Take care not to fall foul of the complicated contributions and transfer balance cap rules.

6. Accumulation accounts will still form part of your superannuation death benefit but cannot be taken as a reversionary income stream

An accumulation account is a separate interest to any retirement phase pension in the SMSF. As such, a separate superannuation death benefit will be payable when a member passes away. It can be documented as such so that the accumulation interest is paid to a different beneficiary to the retirement phase pension if so desired upon death. However, an accumulation interest can only be taken by beneficiaries as a death benefit income stream or lump sum. It will not form part of a reversionary income stream, even if the pension from which the accumulation balance was commuted was a reversionary pension. The beneficiary will also not have the 12-month grace period under the transfer balance cap rules like that received from reversionary income streams. The beneficiary will need to decide as soon as practicable whether to take the death benefit as a lump sum and withdraw it from super, or as a death benefit income stream subject to their own transfer balance cap.

7. Franking credits can be utilised

Under the Labor Party proposal, franking credits would be lost if fund assets were solely supporting retirement phase income streams producing exempt income. However, where a member has an accumulation account, franking credits can be used to offset the tax liability on the remaining assessable income.

8. Income earned on fund assets will not be 100% exempt from tax

The SMSF is likely to have disregarded small fund assets and as such be required to use the proportionate method to claim exempt current pension income (ECPI). This means that an actuarial certificate is required prior to completing the SMSF annual return. The actuarial exempt income proportion will identify what proportion of the fund’s assessable income will be exempt from income tax.

A fund has disregarded small fund assets where it has a retirement phase account in an income year and so is eligible to claim ECPI, however at the prior 30 June any member in the SMSF had a total super balance in excess of $1.6 million. This total super balance includes accumulation and retirement phase accounts both in the SMSF and elsewhere in superannuation.

 

Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Accurium and Challenger, please click here.

6 Comments
Dorian Wild
October 05, 2020

Hi.
Very interesting article...but I have a question.
I am aged 75 and have a smsf with a balance under $1.6 million, comprising cash but mainly ASX shares.
Some of the shares have a fairly low yield and low or zero franking credits.
Can I swap these shares for shares held in my personal name which carry a higher yield and higher franking credits.
My aim would be to keep the swaps equal, so there is no increase to the super fund balance.
Many thanks

Frank Ven
June 21, 2020

Hi Melaine,

A very interesting article.

I believe that one of the times that retirees who have balances in excess of $1.6 million will not have both a retirement phase pension and a non-retirement phase accumulation account would be someone that had made a structured settlement contribution before the 1 July 2017. Because as you would know a retiree in that situation would get the benefit of a debit equal to their credits as at 1 July 2017 (if the structured settlement is less than the total credits). This would make their TBC as at 1 July 2017 $NIL.

Graeme Morgan
February 13, 2019

Thanks for the article.
I am wondering of the possibilty and advantages and disadvantages of converting smsf pension phase into accumulation phase since the beneficiary is now working with a substantial income. Then later going into pension phase again.

adf
December 14, 2018

I thought the low cap rate was abolished

Melanie
December 13, 2018

Thanks for your comment John.
You are correct that only a dependent beneficiary can elect to take a death benefit as a death benefit income stream or/and a lump sum. A non-dependent must take the death benefit as a lump sum.
The following ATO webpage explains more about paying superannuation death benefits: https://www.ato.gov.au/Super/APRA-regulated-funds/Paying-benefits/Paying-superannuation-death-benefits/

John De Ravin
December 12, 2018

This is a very helpful and interesting article, thank you Melanie!

I particularly liked Hints 4 to 7 (especially 4 and 5) which have a bearing on the appropriate choice of strategies and have the potential to save trustees a LOT of money. Hints 1 to 3 and 8 are also completely valid, it's just that I would think that in many cases, those aspects would be handled by the SMSF's administrators or accountants.

One additional observation in relation to Hint 6 about the form of death benefits payable from accumulation accounts: I presume that Hint 6 is subject to the same limitations that apply to other (non-SMSF) super funds as to which beneficiaries can receive a benefit in the form of a pension (eg spouse, children under the age of 18, dependent children up to age 24 and some less common categories).

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Five urban myths about super changes

SMSFs and COVID: the biggest trends in 5 charts

5 common mistakes in running an SMSF

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Have the rules of retirement investing changed?

In retirement, we still want to reduce stock volatility while generating cash flows. The two needs have not changed, but the reward expected in the old days from interest payments has gone. What should we do?

18 Aussie names for your watchlist

A Morningstar stock screener reveals a cross-section of companies with competitive advantages that are trading at material discounts to estimated value. This is a list of 18 highly-rated names worth watching.

Hamish Douglass on what really matters

Questions on the stock market/economy disconnect, how to focus long term, technology's growing role, income in a low-rate world, Modern Monetary Theory and endless debt and the tooth fairy.

Kate Howitt: investing lessons and avoiding the PIPO trade

Kate Howitt identifies the stocks she likes and the disappointments, gives context to the increasing role of retail investors, and explains why the market is more of a 'voting not weighing' machine than ever before.

Buffett and his warning about 'virtually certain' earnings

While many investors are happy to invest in any online companies, Warren Buffett focusses more on the quality of future growth, buying companies whose earnings are 'virtually certain' in 10 or 20 years from now.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 378

Budgets are forecasts, and more than most, Josh Frydenberg and Treasury waved a wet finger in the air in compiling the 2020 version. How many companies will now employ a new apprentice for $100 a week subsidy? Which back-of-the-envelope showed 3.5 million businesses would use the instant asset write off? And the $17.9 billion for super savings based on the YourSuper proposal is wishful thinking.

  • 8 October 2020

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 380

Former US Vice President Al Gore once told me he needed to raise only US$70,000 when he first ran for politics. Now Biden and Trump spend billions just on television advertising. Little wonder so many favours are owed after each election, and this time, it really matters. Plus investing insights from Kate Howitt, Hamish Douglass, Roger Montgomery, Phil Ruthven and Morningstar's top stock picks.

  • 22 October 2020
Interviews

Kate Howitt: investing lessons and avoiding the PIPO trade

Kate Howitt identifies the stocks she likes and the disappointments, gives context to the increasing role of retail investors, and explains why the market is more of a 'voting not weighing' machine than ever before.

Investment strategies

Hamish Douglass on what really matters

Questions on the stock market/economy disconnect, how to focus long term, technology's growing role, income in a low-rate world, Modern Monetary Theory and endless debt and the tooth fairy.

Investment strategies

Buffett and his warning about 'virtually certain' earnings

While many investors are happy to invest in any online companies, Warren Buffett focusses more on the quality of future growth, buying companies whose earnings are 'virtually certain' in 10 or 20 years from now.

Shares

18 Aussie names for your watchlist

A Morningstar stock screener reveals a cross-section of companies with competitive advantages that are trading at material discounts to estimated value. This is a list of 18 highly-rated names worth watching.

Economy

Are debt and its servicing cost serious worries?

The impact of the pandemic on Australia's debt and deficit has forced the government into borrowing on a scale unimaginable at the start of 2020. What are the implications, and what is even more important?

Investment strategies

Why not use options to protect your share portfolio?

Many investors ask why fund managers do not protect the portfolio downside by using options. All insurance has a cost, and achieving full protection is expensive, but there are other ways to use options.

Property

A-REITs offering much-needed income

Many listed property stocks were hard hit by COVID, especially in retail, but foot traffic outside Victoria has held up relatively well. Some sectors are now good value for the recovery and less working from home.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.