Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 401

Active funds in Australia land some punches

Like their peers around the world, Australians have enthusiastically embraced passively managed index tracking funds in recent years. Active funds are of course still significantly larger than their passive counterparts making up roughly $2 in every $3 of equity assets under management in this country, about the same as in the UK.

Change happens more slowly than we think

This is simply because net flows of new cash into funds are orders of magnitude smaller than the hundreds of billions of dollars already under management, so change tends to happen rather slowly. What’s more, having steadily lost market share in the past, active funds have recently fought for new investment dollars more successfully here in Australia than they have in in comparable countries.

The Calastone network handles hundreds of millions of fund transactions around the world each year. We have good coverage in Australia, so we get a great overview. It is not our role to say one kind of fund is better than another. This is a job for financial advisers and investors themselves. But we are well positioned to observe the behavioural trends and pick up turning points long before anyone else can, and in real time.

What's happening with fund flows?

First a bit of context. 2020 saw a huge increase in overall transaction volumes across our network globally (+45% compared to 2019). The year started with net outflows from equity funds as the coronavirus infection took hold in China. Investors in Asia were first out of the blocks. Australians and Europeans jumped ship next, selling down heavily in February, while those in the UK took longer to respond.

From April onwards, however, the global policy response to the pandemic prompted investors everywhere to pump cash into equity funds. Australian investors were among the most bullish, adding $6.8 billion to their holdings by the end of the year. Three fifths of this was in November and December alone as vaccine approvals raised hopes for an end to the pandemic. Our index of funds flows for the year scored a very positive 54.9 in Australia compared to those outside Australia of 51.3 (a reading of 50 means inflows equal outflows).

More than a third of the money Australians added to equity funds in 2020 went into funds that only invest in Australian equities. In Europe, the UK, and most of Asia, investors preferred to take a more global approach. While there are good reasons to have a portion of savings in domestic assets, it is surprising to see Australia-only funds take such a big slice of the inflows. Perhaps the successful suppression of the pandemic here in Australia encouraged investors to stay local.

When it comes to active and index funds, investors behave rather like fund managers. Flows into index funds are relatively stable, reflecting a simple ‘buy and hold’ strategy that accumulates savings over time. Net inflows are large by comparison due to total trading volumes – steady buying, not much turnover.

By contrast, investors trade their active funds much more often, picking favoured funds, adding money more opportunistically in response to news flow on economic, political or world events. Investors re-allocate around the world by switching between funds with a particular regional focus or favoured strategy. For active funds, total trading activity is very large, and the resulting net inflow or outflow is extremely small by comparison to overall volumes.

Net fund flows are small relative to huge trading volumes

 

Overseas, index funds are comfortable winners

Outside Australia, index trackers comfortably beat active funds in the race to attract new capital in the last two years. Across Calastone’s global network, index funds garnered inflows of $12.2 billion in 2019 and a further $18.2 billion in 2020. By contrast, active funds saw net outflows of $16.7 billion in 2019 and would have shed cash again in 2020 were it not for a dramatic turnaround in the final quarter. By the end of the year, investors added a net $3.3 billion to their holdings (not enough to make up for 2019 outflows).

Net inflows for index tracking equity funds were US$23.5 billion (A$31 billion) in 2019 and 2020.

Australians still focus on active funds 

In Australia, the preference for passive funds has been less clear in the last couple of years. Australians actually added modestly to their active fund holdings in 2019 and significantly in 2020, in contrast to investors in the rest of the world. Over the two-year period, these inflows totalled A$5.7 billion.

Unlike investors elsewhere, Australians added less to index funds - A$3.6 billion. However, there was relatively little two-way trading associated with the index-fund flows. Activity was characterised by steadier buying while active fund inflows were on the back of volumes four times greater.

The long bull market has favoured passive funds. Savers are happy to ride a rising index and take the simple market return. But passive investors are all-in on market bubbles and market crashes alike. Moreover, the rise of mega-caps like Apple and Amazon has increased absolute risk for passive investors, even if a fund continues to mirror the market perfectly. This is a sort of hidden risk.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Active funds winning in ESG globally

There is one area where the active fund management industry outside Australia is mounting a hugely successful defence against the rise of index trackers – ESG funds. They are the undisputed success story of the last two years. From a near standing start, they have captured investor imagination to such an extent that in 2019 and 2020 they took an astonishing $84 in every net $100 flowing over our network into equity funds of any kind. Net inflows rose seven-fold between 2019 and 2020, even though overall turnover in ESG funds only doubled. Three quarters of this new ESG capital ($16.3 billion) flowed into active funds.

Globally, three quarters of new ESG capital (US$11.3 billion) flowed into active funds. If we strip out ESG funds altogether then traditional active funds have shed US$16.8 billion over last two years.

UK and European investors have been the keenest buyers. Based on fund flows, Australian and Asian investors appear to be about two and three years behind the curve respectively. In 2019 and 2020, Australian investors added just $1.2 billion to ESG equity funds, only $1 for every $13 that flowed into equity funds of any kind – a fraction of the global average.

Appetite is growing, however. November and December saw larger inflows to ESG funds in Australia than in the previous two years combined. Active managers like them because it’s much easier to differentiate their funds from vanilla index trackers. In Australia they are pushing at an open door.

Investors have shown they are still open to buying active funds. Structurally, index funds are likely to take more market share over time, but ESG has given active managers a new string to their bow and a good reason to fight back.

 

Edward Glyn is Head of Global Markets at Calastone. The full report, “Tidal Forces – Can Active Funds Fight the Passive Flows?” can be downloaded here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

Four reasons ESG investing continues to grow

Too much, too fast: four ways we are investing now

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Retirement

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Property

Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.

Property

Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.

Shares

10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.