Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 201

Active versus passive: there’s more to it

I am as guilty as most market participants of using the phrase ‘active versus passive’, when strictly speaking, that is not what I mean. The problem with using those terms is it glosses over some important details. As a simple example, a highly active investor can use index funds and a highly passive investor can use traditional actively managed funds.

What should the debate focus? There are three comparisons that immediately spring to mind:

  1. Low cost versus high cost
  2. Low turnover versus high turnover
  3. Rules-based versus forecast-based.

Low cost versus high cost funds

We have written at length about the costs of funds and ETFs. Costs are closely associated with performance. Numerous studies have confirmed this, starting with the work of Nobel Laureate William Sharpe in ‘Mutual Fund Performance’ written in 1966. It is not as if the thought is new, rather the marketing of more expensive investment options has been very effective.

Why do costs matter so much? Fees are taken directly out of performance daily and investors never actually see them. The less paid in fees, the more that remains for the investor, but it's not as simple as active equals expensive and index equals cheap.

Not all index funds are cheap nor active funds expensive

Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, May 2017

Low turnover versus high turnover

One metric that is often overlooked, but is extremely important particularly to after-tax returns, is turnover. Turnover measures the frequency in which securities are traded over a 12-month period and serves as a proxy for trading costs. Trading costs directly impact a fund’s performance (and again, like fees, are taken out prior to performance is calculated, making it difficult to see). In addition, capital gains can be locked in and then passed through to the investor. Traditional active managers and indeed some rules-based approaches have very high turnover, which investors pay for, and again impacts directly the returns realised.

Not all index funds have low turnover

Source: Morningstar, Owners Advisory, May 2017

Rules-based versus forecast-based

Rules-based investment strategies are what underpin nearly every smart beta offering or factor tilt investment strategy. Typically, rules-based approaches are based on academic research. Value, for example, is such a factor. Researched endlessly, in the early work by Fama and French, companies with low price-to-book ratios were identified as providing excess returns to the market over the long -term. Indeed, straight cap-weighted index funds, such as an investment that tracks the S&P/ASX 200 is another factor investment, but here the factor is beta or the market as a whole. These rule-based strategies do not care about the direction of the market. They simple follow the rules.

On the other hand, forecast-based approaches are typically seen in the traditional active management strategies. Analysts work to identify the ‘true’ or ‘fair’ value of a security using some valuation method and then look to see where mispriced securities may be lurking. This is a tough gig, particularly as technology improves. A well-designed algorithm can identify mispricings much faster than a human can. The impact is to push prices to their ‘fair’ value faster than was once the case.

Using the phrase ‘active versus passive’ is an oversimplification of the problem investors face when thinking about how to implement their asset allocation. Really, what ultimately matters is returns individual investment vehicles deliver, not whether they are index investments or not.

 

Leah Kelly is Portfolio Manager at Owners Advisory. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.