Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 169

Advice is silver bullet on super battlefield

In the battle to retain super fund members into retirement, advice is the key weapon. And First State Super's acquisition of financial planning firm StatePlus for about $1 billion is a clarion call to this new super fund battlefield. By buying a well-respected financial planning provider, First State Super signalled that advice is of paramount importance for leading super funds. If leadership means ‘taking a stand and acting on something you believe in’, this move shows advice is critical to serving members and keeping them into retirement phase.

Higher satisfaction levels

Other funds have increasingly stated the importance of advice in their plans. Advised investors, on the whole, benefit from savings, investment and insurance advice through better outcomes, and generally report higher levels of satisfaction.

These efforts seem to be paying off as, anecdotally at least, funds that make strong financial planning efforts appear to have much better member retention rates into retirement and more success particularly with higher- balance members.

But many funds have only a basic financial planning offer, provided more as an add-on service, not a core component. And the numbers from Comparator show just how modest the overall impact is: industry-wide, only 2% of members reportedly receive financial advice from their super fund each year.

Industry, and other profit-for-member funds, were once labelled the ‘sleeping giant’ of the advice business and it’s long been suspected that industry and retail funds would converge through more similar advice offers. Surely, the giant is waking up.

Strategic imperative and strategic decisions

If there’s a clear strategic imperative for fund executives to build advice capabilities, it’s not quite as clear how to do it. Executives face a number of strategic questions and opportunities:

a.  Distribute through independent financial planners? In the post FOFA fee-for-service world, the competitive pricing and performance of profit-for-member funds should place them in a strong position to compete with retail funds in distribution through independent financial planners. This is dependent on them being able to master the arcane requirements of third-party distribution, build a brand, and match the service proposition of retail funds.

b.  Introduce external planners to serve members? A number of funds, such as AustralianSuper and Sunsuper, have headed down this path by developing panels of independent financial advisers to extend the services available to members. The challenge of course is to not lose the member in the process.

c.  Build internal planning capability? Many funds such as Unisuper have ramped up internal capability by hiring a team of planners, with all the licensing, management and business process challenges that involves. Smaller funds may struggle to get the economies of scale and efficiency needed to offer a first-class effort, but larger funds may be able to do it with a significant investment.

d.  Reach the mass of members? This requires adopting a much broader focus than traditional advice approaches. The economics of financial planning delivery means that only high balance members can be served through traditional telephone or face-to-face processes. The costs per statement of advice are too high to provide advice to the mass membership. Retail firms often talk about the costs of advice being $2000-$3000 per client. Even straightforward intra-fund telephone advice can cost hundreds of dollars to deliver. Those economics aren’t supported by the typical balances of industry fund members.

The role of digital advice in reaching a larger audience

Leaders look at trends and what is happening in other industries for a competitive edge, and digital advice has the potential to be the ‘game-changer’. Using the toolkit of digital disruption changes the economics of advice delivery and opens up access to advice for all members at low costs.

Digital advice enables personalised experiences, both financial and behavioural. Digital approaches can engage the client in an ongoing journey, which makes the experience personalised, on demand (24X7), ‘in my living room’ or anywhere else. Digital advice need not be transactional based only on one-time statements of advice. It can guide. It can educate. It can provide motivation and personalised communications as needed.

And it can coexist with traditional human forms of advice. Effective triage is an essential part of strong digital advice offers. At times, people need the validation provided by another human being; at times, advice requirements are just beyond today's digital solutions.

The US industry has been leading the way. While often referred to as robo advice, that catchy title doesn’t capture the variety of digitally based solutions currently available. Often overlooked in articles about US robo advice is Financial Engines, the ‘granddaddy’ of online retirement advice services companies. This pioneer, founded by Nobel Laureate Bill Sharpe, has for 20 years offered online retirement forecasts, advice and managed accounts to members of US defined contribution (401(k)) plans. Financial Engines currently provides advice to millions of members, with assets under advice exceeding $A1,300 billion, and investments in managed discretionary accounts of more than $A160 billion. It is the largest independent investment adviser in the US.

Others in the US are focusing on hybrid solutions. A major trend is using technology to make human advisers more efficient and allowing the interaction between consumer and adviser to be more interactive and integrated, so the customer can decide when to obtain advice online and when to call a human adviser.

In conclusion, advice will become a key battlefield for funds serving their members into retirement. As most funds don’t have a billion to spare to buy existing capability and need better ways to reach the mass membership with ongoing advice, digital advice is the most promising solution.


Jeremy Duffield is Co-Founder of SuperEd. See He was the Managing Director and Founder of Vanguard Investments Australia, and he retired as Chairman in 2010.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.