Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 172

Annuities have come a long way

The practice where I work as an adviser has, for various reasons, predominantly attracted older senior clients over the years. While we do have a growing number of wealth accumulators, there has been a strong focus on retiree, seniors and ageing-related issues.

One would think then that we have been signing our clients up to annuities left, right and centre for a long time. However, until this year, this hasn’t really been the case. The recovering share market of recent years, strong franked dividend yields from ‘defensive’ market sectors and low interest rates have made annuities relatively uninteresting as a long-term investment option for most of our client base.

Until recently, that is. This year we’ve noticed a major shift in investment attitudes, and suddenly those in their advanced years are looking at annuities with increasing interest, even with current interest rates at record lows.

We’ve seen more global uncertainty in 2016 than at any time since the GFC. Brexit, falling fuel and oil prices, wars, political uncertainty, a slowing Chinese economy, and record low bond yields are contributing to a wary economic outlook and elderly investors are nervous about their share market exposure. Couple that with some innovative annuity enhancements over recent years and changes to the age pension assets test kicking in on 1 January 2017 and suddenly annuities are on the radar.

What is an annuity?

An annuity is simply a guaranteed income stream purchased from a life company with a lump sum. The payments are promised up front by quotation, so the investor knows what they’re signing up for from the outset. The ‘guarantee’ does not refer to a government guarantee that applies to bank accounts and term deposits. However, the life companies are closely regulated and their reserving requirements make their guarantees solid.

The annuity can be paid until the holder dies (a ‘lifetime’ annuity), or for a fixed number of years (a ‘term’ annuity). It can be linked to inflation, or not, and can have a residual amount paid back at the end of the term. The annuitant chooses the features that determine the income level.

By way of illustration, let’s look at an investment amount of $100,000, and how the features selected change the income that it pays. The results in the table below are based on quotations received from a leading annuity provider on 5 September 2016 for a 70-year-old male with monthly annuity payments. Note for these quotes, I have not included upfront or ongoing Adviser Service fees – these can also be built in to the quotations.

What sets annuities apart from term deposits is their tax and social security treatment. Term annuities that only pay out the interest component (100% RCV) are basically the same as term deposits, but nil RCV and lifetime annuities have distinct advantages.

In the 7 year, nil RCV, nil indexation example above, the tax and social security rules recognise that a large portion of the $15,807 payment is in fact return of capital. That return of capital is calculated simply as:

With $14,286 of the $15,807 annuity payment considered return of capital, only $1,521 is assessed as taxable income and income-tested income.

Life expectancy (taken from the Australian Life Tables 2010-2012) is the denominator when the calculation is on a lifetime annuity. So for the lifetime examples above, the return of capital amount is:

This is more than the actual income the annuity pays, so no income is assessed for tax or Centrelink purposes.

Under the Assets Test, the return of capital is deducted off the purchase price each year to determine how much counts.

Who wants annuities?

Jack and Mary are in their late 70s and in good health. They’ve sold their home and bought into a retirement village, leaving $360,000 of capital to invest. They have an existing share portfolio and are comfortably living off the dividends and their part age pension. However, the pension is set to halve as a result of Centrelink counting the capital released from the home as an asset, then halve again from 1 January 2017 with the new Assets test.

They are adamant that they do not want any further share market exposure, and term deposits are not appealing with their low rates. We showed them an annuity product that guarantees income for the life of the annuitant and has a ‘withdrawal guarantee’ that allows a guaranteed amount to be withdrawn after 15 years, if required.

Lifetime annuities of old lost their appeal as there was little or no guarantee that any capital would be repaid from it after purchase. But recent products have largely solved this problem and allows for a withdrawal amount along the way up to 15 years.

Annuities can also have generous tax, income and asset test treatments compared with term deposits, so over time Jack and Mary’s age pension may improve at a faster rate than if they had invested in term deposits, fixed interest or shares.

Suitable for older clients who dislike market volatility

Then there’s Keith and Leanne, each about 80 years old and utterly risk averse. They are attached to their age pension and, like Jack and Mary, have downsized and unlocked capital from their home that is going to eat into their pension now and from 1 January. They were looking for something with no market volatility that would also allow their pension benefits to increase over time.

They chose two 7-year annuities with nil RCV. Splitting the investment by half to give them an annuity each, they now have a known cash flow and optimised age pension. If one passes away before the 7-year term expires, the annuity continues to the survivor. If they both pass away, the estate will continue to receive the payments until the term is complete, or it can opt to get a lump sum payout.

Then we have Neville, who is single with $2 million in rolling term deposits. Shares (or managed funds) were never an option for him. While not a pensioner, Neville was equally determined to qualify for whatever government benefits he could, and his attachment was to the Commonwealth Seniors Health Care card. The interest on the term deposits was going to disqualify him from holding that card.

Neville had made provision for $500,000 worth of cash bequests and wanted to retain at least that much for his estate. In his words, he wanted an investment that provided the same or similar level of capital security as term deposits with a competitive return and tax efficiency.

Again, the lifetime annuity that provides for a withdrawal guarantee came into play, his taxable income was reduced so that he retains his CSHC card.

Annuities generally don’t make for lively dinner conversation. Those that remember the old products are surprised that, given global economic volatility and product innovation, they are more appealing now.

 

Alex Denham is a Senior Adviser with Dartnall Advisers in Berrima. Prior to becoming an adviser, she spent 20 years in senior technical roles with several financial services companies. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

5 Comments
Alex Denham
September 14, 2016

The rule change that came in on 1 January 2015 affects account-based income streams only. Non-account based annuities such as lifetime annuities and fixed term annuities with a term of greater than 5 years (unless life expectancy is less than 5 years) continue to be assessed using the deductible amount formula. Short-term annuties (less than 5 years) are deemed.

Rafal Chomik
September 12, 2016

As far as means-test treatment, I thought that since 2015, deeming rates apply when determining the amount counted in the income test, and these are unaffected by actual amount of annuity income or capital returned.

Bruce Gregor
September 08, 2016

Very useful article. The longer the term of the annuity (particularly lifetime) the more you need to be convinced the providing company will remain solvent throughout your lifetime. To my knowledge there are no government guarantees in Australia like the $250,000 bank term deposit guarantee. A drop in yields like we have now is a big risk for annuity companies.

Warren Bird
September 14, 2016

Yes, I'm always a little concerned when I read someone saying that, because insurance companies have to hold reserves and are regulated by APRA, that makes them safe. It doesn't. If, for example, the investment policy of the reserves is risky, then they might not provide much protection when it's most needed. HIH had a lot of reserves, but they were invested in very poor quality assets and that contributed to their demise.

Some insurers are rated AA as a credit risk, but some are rated lower than that. Without naming names, one of the popular annuity providers is rated BBB+. That's investment grade, but it's a credit rating level that I would always prefer to have no more than 5% of my portfolio invested in any one credit.
The point is that having annuities with several providers, with smaller amounts invested through those with lower credit ratings, is part of the risk management strategy. The odds of losing capital are really small, but what you are managing is the consequences that flow from something going wrong. (Tail risk.)

Sorry if that sounds like a lot of work, but you can't look at annuities as an easy way out of having to manage investment risk. Even if they are marketed that way.

An alternative way to get a similar outcome is to buy a few well managed corporate bond funds, with perhaps a bit of equity income thrown in as well. Reinvest the distributions, but set up a regular withdrawal at a similar % rate as the going annuity rate. You don't have the same guarantee of return, but you get the cash flow, you get diversification and you get the flexibility to withdraw some capital should you later find that you need it. You create your own annuity in a way.

Seek advice first, as always, but please ask your adviser to fully explain to you the investment risks of any strategy. Annuities will suit some people, but not others and there are other ways of getting the same result.

David
September 08, 2016

Interesting to see how life annuities are being used but it is unclear if/how the return of capital amount is recalculated each year.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Overcoming loss aversion in retirement income

Retirement income products - what's ideal?

Longevity risk solutions for retirees

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates

Economy

The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.

Shares

Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.

Shares

The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.

Property

The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.