Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 267

ANZ-IOOF deal mired by conflicts of interest

The A$1 billion sale of OnePath by ANZ is at risk of being stranded in a minefield of internal and external conflicts, caught between doing the right thing by members of the OnePath fund versus obtaining the best deal for shareholders of ANZ, as well as looking after the advisers that will support the fund in future.

And now there is another spanner in the works, one which ANZ’s witnesses at the Royal Commission in Melbourne yesterday were careful not to specify: the reputational risk, in that IOOF may not be the best cultural fit for OnePath after all.

ANZ is now being forced to tread warily, as Victoria Weekes, chair of OnePath Custodians, expressed so diplomatically:

“For OnePath Custodians to provide approval, and at this stage it’s just talking about in-principle approval, it will be conditional upon various matters, including being satisfied that it’s in members’ best interests for things to proceed.”

Michael Hodge, Counsel Assisting the Commissioner, questioned Weekes on some aspects of the decision by ANZ to sell its Wealth business to IOOF.

On the face of it, there are an increasingly complex number of issues emerging, not the least of which being that the sale to IOOF is beginning to look like not being in the best interests of OnePath’s members.

And even so, if the sale is done in a way that minimises capital gains exposure, it will end the payment of trailing commissions to the advisors associated with OnePath under current grandfathering arrangements that stretch back before the introduction of FOFA rules.

This raises obvious questions as to why it is in the OnePath members’ best interests to keep paying commissions to advisers when these could be stopped. But if that happens, the attractiveness of OnePath to potential buyers drops – creating a conflict around what is the best deal for ANZ’s shareholders.

The structure presently consists of a trustee, OnePath Custodians, which is the trustee of two super funds. One of those funds is OnePath Master Fund and the other is the Retirement Portfolio Service.

The Retirement Portfolio Service effectively functions like a superannuation wrap platform, allowing investments into products of a fund member’s choice. In contrast, the OnePath Master Fund contains a variety of different products, including a MySuper product and two Smart Choice Super products – one for retail investors, and another for employers.

The OnePath Master Fund deals with a related party insurer, OnePath Life, and ANZ is also selling this insurance business – although to Zurich.

One consequence of the sale to Zurich is that the OnePath Master Fund will need to unwind its investments through the life insurance policies. The extraction of the investment component parts and superannuation parts from the life insurance, or from the life insurance company, has been proving awkward.

“The preferred method for the trustee of de-linking the OnePath Master Fund from the insurance policy investments is by successor fund transfer of the OnePath Master Fund into the Retirement Portfolio Service,” Weekes said.

One of the main advantages of this method is that it has a capital gains benefit, so if you combine the redemption of those investment linked life policies with a successor fund transfer, then there’s no impact on members of the fund.

Once that successor fund transfer happens, assuming that it does, there will only be one super fund operated by OnePath Custodians, the Retirement Portfolio Service.

And OnePath Custodians will, as part of the IOOF transaction, be sold to IOOF, meeting one of the preconditions.

What’s adding further intrigue to the deal is if the successor fund transfer disturbs Future of Financial Advice grandfathering of commission arrangements – or rather the risk that will flow if grandfathering were not maintained, that was a problem. “Support from the adviser network is critical for the IOOF sale,” Weekes said.

Weekes confirmed that the present status is that OnePath Life pays commissions to advisers, and “the current working assumption is that commissions will continue to be grandfathered.”

Hodge asked: “Has the trustee considered previously why it’s in the best interests of members to continue paying commissions?"

Weekes: “No, not – not in that specific manner, no.”

And then the question of how to deal with IOOF, given their performance in this round of the round commission inquiry.

In response to Hodge’s question as to why the board [of OnePath] is yet to have a presentation from IOOF, Weekes launched into a long explanation that could be summarised as:

“It is a complex process and we need to be clear about what input we want from IOOF and how IOOF will treat OnePath and its members. … to satisfy ourselves as part of a broader package that both the [successor fund transfer] and the transaction will be in members’ best interests.”

 

Bernard Kellerman is Deputy Editor of Banking Day. This article was originally published in Banking Day.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Conflicted selling fees are back, and it’s game on

Four things advisers can do to manage conflicts

The saga of FoFA (so far) - a reprise from 2014

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.