Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 610

Are pension rules impacting fertility?

Australia’s fertility rate has dropped to a historic low level of 1.5 births per woman, well below the replacement rate of 2.1 required to maintain a stable population. One factor affecting fertility decisions may be the availability of childcare, as it helps reduce financial and logistical barriers to child-rearing. Grandmothers are a vital source of informal childcare support for many families. However, policies that increase the labour market participation of older women, such as raising the Age Pension eligibility age from 60 to 67, may reduce grandmothers’ availability to provide childcare.

This note investigates an underexplored trade-off in policy design: how measures encouraging work among the older population can unintentionally impact their offspring’s fertility rates. Specifically, it investigates how changes to Age Pension eligibility age may have reduced grandmothers’ availability for childcare, subsequently influencing their daughters’ fertility decisions. Given Australia’s low fertility rates and aging population, this note highlights the trade-offs in designing policies that encourage labour force participation among older people without negatively affecting fertility.

Our results show:

  • The increase in the pension eligibility age delayed grandmothers’ retirement, increasing their employment rate from 25% to 36%, and hours of work by 3.9 hours per week.
  • Having a grandmother who qualifies for the pension based on her age increases the likelihood that her daughter will have a child, from 69% to 73.5%, and increases the average number of children per woman from 1.47 to 1.56. This effect on the average number of children per woman is comparable to the impact observed with the introduction of paid parental leave policies.
  • Among daughters in lower-wealth households and those with lower educational attainment, grandmother’s pension eligibility had a larger effect on fertility, suggesting that access to grandparental childcare may play a greater role in fertility decisions for these groups.
  • The increase in pension eligibility age reduces grandmothers’ ability to provide childcare by keeping them in the labour market longer. Grandmothers who are age-qualified for the pension are more likely to provide childcare, whereas those who work longer hours are less available for caregiving.

Fertility decisions are shaped by a range of factors, often reflecting a trade-off between career prospects and family planning. Support systems/arrangements, such as free or grandparental childcare, play a crucial role in easing the financial burden of child-rearing. The recent Productivity Commission report on early childhood education and care underscores the importance of grandparental childcare, highlighting its spillover effects: caring for grandchildren can act as a barrier to working for grandparents and lead them to reduce their working hours to provide this support. However, less attention has been paid to the reverse dynamic: policies aimed at increasing labour market participation among older individuals may reduce the availability of grandparental childcare, potentially impacting fertility choices among their offspring.

Census data reveal that grandparental care is predominantly provided by women, with the share of women caring for other children — likely their grandchildren — peaking around their age pension (AP) eligibility age. This pattern underscores the trade-offs they face between caregiving and labour market participation.

Figure 1: Effect of age pension eligibility on women’s labour market outcomes by age pension eligibility

What is the effect of pension reform on the labour supply of older women?

The Australian AP reform has gradually raised the minimum age for AP eligibility for women from 60 to 67, increasing by six months every two years since July 1, 1995, to decrease the fiscal cost of the aging population. Using data from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, Figure 1 illustrates that women eligible for the pension based on their age1 have lower employment rates and work fewer hours per week compared to those who are not eligible. However, this raw comparison does not account for the differences between cohorts, which are influenced by the gradual implementation of the reform. For example, consider two women born in June 1952 and June 1954, respectively. The woman born in 1952 would qualify for the pension at age 65, while the woman born in 1954 would qualify at age 66. As a result, when these women are 65 years old, one becomes eligible for the pension based on age, while the other would still be ineligible. These differences in outcomes by pension eligibility reflect not only the staggered rollout of the policy, but also the varying social and economic contexts experienced by different birth cohorts. As a result, women from different cohorts may have been influenced by varying economic, social, and labour market conditions, potentially confounding the observed relationship between pension eligibility and employment outcomes. Therefore, it is important to control for these differences.

To address this, we control for observed and unobserved, time-invariant factors affecting labour market outcomes, such as cohort-specific differences.2 After accounting for individual differences, our analysis shows that the employment rate among grandmothers eligible for the pension is 25%, compared to 36% for those who are ineligible. Additionally, eligible grandmothers worked 3.9 fewer hours per week. These results suggest that the Australian pension reform was effective in keeping older women in the labour market, achieving its intended policy goal.

What is the effect of mother’s age pension eligibility on the fertility of daughters?

Women whose mothers are eligible for the AP based on their age are more likely to have children and have more children on average, compared to women whose mothers are of similar age but ineligible (Figure 2). However, this association may also reflect cohort differences, as women whose mothers qualified for AP earlier belong to older cohorts that may have different norms, socioeconomic conditions, and characteristics.

Figure 2: Effect of mother’s age pension eligibility on fertility of daughters by age pension eligibility

After taking into account individual, age- and year-specific factors, we find that having a mother eligible for AP increases the probability of having a child from 69% to 73.5% and increases the average number of children from 1.47 to 1.56. These effects are more pronounced for women in lower-income households and those without a university degree, suggesting that grandparent support is likely more important for women facing greater financial or social constraints.

The observed impact of grandmother’s AP eligibility on the average number of births is around 4.5%, comparable to the effect of introducing paid parental leave policies, which increased the average number of births by 5% through improved childcare support and reduced financial burdens.

How does grandmothers’ pension eligibility affect their childcare provision?

The most plausible mechanism linking grandmothers’ AP eligibility to their daughters’ fertility is the availability of informal childcare. Pension reform delayed grandmothers’ retirement, which could have reduced their ability to provide childcare to their grandchildren. Our results confirm this, showing that grandmothers eligible for pension based on their age are more likely to provide childcare, with the proportion increasing from 59.4% to 63.4%. Additionally, the frequency of care increases with their pension eligibility.

We examine grandmothers’ hours of work to understand whether this increase in childcare provision is driven by the reform’s effect on grandmothers’ labour market participation. Our analysis shows that once we account for the hours worked by grandmothers, the effects of pension eligibility on the provision and frequency of childcare become smaller and less pronounced. Moreover, grandmothers who work longer hours are less likely to provide care for their grandchildren and tend to do so less frequently. Overall, our findings suggest that pension eligibility increases grandmothers’ availability for childcare by reducing their labour market participation.

These findings suggest that pension reforms that increase the eligibility age can have unintended intergenerational consequences on fertility. While such policies aim to improve fiscal sustainability and labour market outcomes, they may inadvertently reduce the availability of grandparental childcare, influencing daughters’ fertility decisions. This highlights the importance of designing policies that balance the needs of an aging population with support for young families. 

 

1 Throughout this note, pension eligibility refers only to age-based eligibility, excluding income, assets, or residency criteria.
2 We also include year-fixed effects and potentially time-varying characteristics such as education, region, etc. 

 

Dr. Pelin Akyol is an Economist and Research Manager at e61 Institute. Professor Kadir Atalay is a Postgraduate Research Coordinator (Economics) at the University of Sydney. The the full report, including references, appendices and disclaimers can be accessed here.

 

5 Comments
Peter
May 09, 2025

Correlation is not causation - as two other comments have pointed out.

Disgruntled
May 09, 2025

Total fertility rate has been in decline since the mid 70's.

This coincides with greater workforce participation from women.

I was born in the later years of the 60's, went to primary school in the mid to late 70's and high school in the early to mid 80's.

Most mothers were stay at home mums or worked part time. Very few of my friends mothers worked full time when I was in primary school.

Mothers working full time when I was in high school picked up amongst my friends mothers. We were older, could be left alone more.

2 income families were becoming more and more common.

Early 90's we had Howard and Costello CGT changes, families with more buying power being able to outbid/outspend single income families.

Investing for yield in property got taken over by investing for Capital Gain, early 2000's property prices began their stellar run.

Debt levels surged, working longer became a necessity to repay the increased borrowings that a 2 income family could take on.

Governments supplemented reduced birth rates by increasing immigration, adding to rental and property prices with the demand/supply metric that ensued.



Old super hand
May 09, 2025

I agree with OldbutSane. There is a lot going on over the periods concerned, with higher labour force participation for older women (and men) driven by a range of factors. Fertility rates are also impacted by a range of factors, with Age Pension eligibility age for a grandmother not likely to have much impact at all. Fertility rates have been falling in many countries, and you could just as easily link this to, say, global warming rather than changes in Age Pension or equivalent qualifying age.

OldbutSane
May 08, 2025

Just because age pension eligibility has increased and fertility has decreased does mean theat one is the consequence of the other. I'm sure one could just as easily correlated the decline in fertility to increased female participation in the workforce.

This theory would have had at least a bit of credence if the author had compared the situation in Australia with other developed countries where the fertility rate has fallen dramatically eg South Korea, Japan, Europe. To do it for one country in isolation proves nothing and to not correct for other factors like increased female participation in the workforce makes the whole analysis suspect.

John G
May 08, 2025

It seems on face value that the "retirement" age for women should be reduced to 60 or even 55. They should also be allowed to continue working part time without having the AP means tested so that they may be in a position to contribute extra to superannuation to overcome disadvantage from non-working years earlier in life.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Australia’s roaring population growth won’t last

Population and ageing nonsense … again

Embracing the bright side of population decline

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

Latest Updates

Economics

Does Buffett’s farewell represent peak America?

Buffett's surprise decision to step down as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO sparked reflection on his legendary legacy and concern for America’s future, as he warned of unsustainable deficits and possible cracks in U.S. exceptionalism.

Taxation

Labor should focus on cutting Government spending

Reining in the Government's appetite for spending wouldn't just ease the country's fiscal burden. It would also clear the way for the meaningful tax reforms that are needed to boost Australia's ailing productivity.

Economy

The Liberals need to return to Menzies’ values

The former Liberal Minister and Chief of Staff to John Howard gives a blunt assessment of the election defeat and how the party needs to get back to its roots and merge its values with the needs of the community.

Gold

Gold $5,000?

Following the gold price's recent surge, headlines have popped up with increasingly bold predictions - US$5,000, even US$20,000 an ounce? This looks at the fundamentals and the credibility of these bullish predictions.

Economy

Are pension rules impacting fertility?

Australia’s push to delay retirement has boosted workforce participation - but at a cost. New research shows the measures have unintentionally impacted fertility rates, and the trend will be hard to reverse.

Investment strategies

Profiting from panic: inside the mind of a contrarian investor

Recent years have been challenging for contrarian investors, though 2025 has brought wild market swings, and with it, more opportunity. MFS' Zahid Kassam discusses contrarianism and his favourite global stocks.

Economics

America's green transition is taking a beating

The green transition in the US has made great progress in recent years, but the wheels are falling off. This is largely due to economic pressures, lack of financing, and the new tariffs instituted by Trump.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.