Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 268

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again

The 2018 financial year, like the previous few years, turned out to be a security picker's market in the listed property, or A-REIT, sector. Performance varied across the 31 stocks in the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Index, ranging from Propertylink up 34.4% to Stockland Group down 3.6%.

Even within sectors, the performance variation was wide. Among the retail A-REITs, SCA Property Group took line honors with a total return of 18.4% while Aventus, the specialist large format retail centre owner, underperformed with a total return of just 4.7%. It was a similar story in the office A-REITs, GDI Property Group returned 33.8%, while Dexus returned just 7.5%. Among the diversified A-REITs, Abacus returned 25.5% and Stockland negative 3.6%.

Overall, the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Accumulation Index finished FY18 on a high, returning 13.2%, in line with the broader equities market, with the last three months delivering a strong return of 9.8%. The strength in the A-REIT sector coincided with rising concerns of an escalation in a trade war between United States and China, political tensions in Europe, a pullback in US bond yields and the flattening of the Australian yield curve.

Office and industrial up, residential steady

In the current reporting season, valuations are up and earnings guidance ranges have narrowed towards the upper end supported by solid rental growth across most office and industrial markets. Notwithstanding the broader market concern about the weakening residential sector, strong settlements were recorded across the Stockland, Mirvac and Ingenia residential portfolios.

Darren Steinberg, CEO of Dexus, was on the money when he recently said:

“It is pleasing to see higher market rents being reflected in our latest round of valuations across many of our assets. In addition, valuers have taken into account recent transactions where there has been no softening in the underlying investment demand for good quality office and industrial properties which continue to attract a variety of domestic and offshore buyers.”

Looking ahead, we expect corporate activity to remain elevated reflecting many A-REITs' inability to acquire assets in the direct market at reasonable prices. Finding bargains is next to impossible at this point in the cycle, and to grow, A-REITs are now looking to M&A. And we’ve seen this play before. Back in 1999-2000 and again in 2006-2007, M&As became defining factors in a relative hot property market.

Also, the lower Australian dollar is making the valuations of A-REITs increasingly attractive to foreign acquirers (note the Unibail-Rodamco acquisition of Westfield Group, Blackstone’s bid for Investa Office Fund, and Brookfield and Hometown’s fight for Gateway Lifestyle).

A-REITs trading at the smallest premiums or discounts to NTA will be most prone to being merged or taken private.

Overall, we expect the A-REIT sector to deliver relatively attractive returns given the continued low domestic interest rate environment. The two wildcards are the impact of more M&A activity and A-REITs, like interest rate sensitive sectors, being susceptible in the short term, to any major sell-off in global bond markets.

A-REITs owned by asset allocators

Unfortunately, short-term volatility is now a permanent feature of the A-REIT market. With more of the A-REITs being owned by general equity funds, hedge funds and global investors, the sector is more susceptible to the gyrations of these investors, who move in and out of the sector, at a whim. In January and February 2018, the A-REIT sector returned negative 3.2% and negative 3.3% respectively, as concerns about rising global inflation pushed global bond yields higher. Fast forward to May and June, when concerns about rising bond yields abated, the A-REIT sector rallied, with returns of 3.0% in May and 2.3% in June.

In such an environment, as an active manager that doesn’t follow the weighting of each A-REIT security in the Index, we favour those stocks with exposure to the social infrastructure and specialised property sub-sectors, selected real estate developers and managers that have growing funds management platforms. We also like securities with quality management and relatively attractive yields that have the ability to actively manage their portfolios to drive income growth. Not all A-REITs will perform the same.

 

Winston Sammat is the Managing Director of the Folkestone Maxim A-REIT Securities Fund. Folkestone is a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

For more articles and papers from Folkestone, please click here.

 

  •   23 August 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
Fundie
August 23, 2018

Not to mention Charter Hall buying Folkestone ...

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Listed property headlines disguise full story

Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

State of play in listed real estate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.