Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 210

Listed property headlines disguise full story

A cursory look at the headline performance of the Australian listed property trusts, or as they are now more commonly known, Australian real estate investment trusts (A-REITs), would suggest all is not well. The S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Index posted a total return of -5.6% in the year to 30 June 2017, underperforming the equities market, which returned 13.8%. The underlying direct property market returned circa 12%.

The headline index performance is deceiving and the composition of the S&P/ASX300 A-REIT Index is fundamentally flawed. Like most indices, it is weighted by the market capitalisation of each security. The larger A-REIT securities such as Scentre (ASX:SCG), Westfield (ASX:WFD) and Stockland (ASX:SGP) have a higher weighting in the Index. It says nothing about the merit of a particular security.

Investors are continually reminded not to put all their eggs in one basket and avoid taking concentration risk. We are told to diversify, diversify, and diversify. Yet the A-REIT Index fails that test. The top eight A-REITs comprise a staggering 78% of the Index by market capitalization, as shown in the figure below. The performance of these A-REITs has a massive influence on the Index and the sector.

S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Index Market Capitalisation – June 2017

Source: IRESS

Impact of the largest companies

The median performance of the top eight A-REITs by market capitalisation was -3%. The big guns, apart from Goodman Group (14.3%), were hit particularly hard – Westfield (-21.5%), SCentre (-13.4%) and Vicinity (-17.3%) as can be seen in the figure below.

A-REITs Performance – 12 Months to 30 June 2017

Source: IRESS

The sell-off in the larger cap stocks was driven mainly by two factors.

Firstly, concerns about the retail sector saw Westfield, Scentre and Vicinty sold-off (like several of the listed retailers) despite all three owning some of the best retail assets in the country.

Secondly, in recent years the A-REIT sector has attracted significant inflows from institutional and global capital chasing its attractive yield. However, as bond yields started rising (the 10-year bond yield rose from 2% to 2.6% during FY17) the sector’s ‘bond-like’ defensive characteristics become less attractive to some investors. The larger, more liquid A-REITs, in particular, came under pressure. Some institutional and global investors started to rotate out of A-REITs into other cyclical sectors of the equities market or redeployed their capital into offshore markets.

At the other end of the scale, the median performance of the smallest eight A-REITs in the Index was a positive 9.9% for the year to 30 June 2017. Of these, Rural Funds Group, GDI Property and Arena REIT were the standouts, delivering stellar returns to investors.

Index does not cover the whole market

Another flaw in the Index is that it only captures 31 listed A-REITs. There are another 15 that are considered too small to be included, typically with a market capitalisation below $350 million. For institutional investors, these A-REITs are not big enough to invest in. Many outside the Index are well managed, have excellent real estate portfolios and performed well in the past year, including Centuria Metropolitan Office REIT (25.5% return) and Australian Unity Office Fund (11.4% return).

Finally, the Index is flawed given its sector composition does not reflect the broader real estate market. Retail A-REITs comprise 45% of the Index, well ahead of diversified A-REITs at 27%, office and industrial A-REITs both at 12%, and specialised A-REITs is a minnow comprising just 4% of the Index. Office, retail and industrial are far more dominant sectors across the real estate landscape.

If we drill down to the underlying asset level and include the retail centres owned by the major diversified AREITs – GPT, Stockland, Mirvac – the exposure to retail is more than 50% of the total assets owned by the sector. Given the structural and cyclical issues currently facing retail, that is a massive bet on the retail sector for anyone invested in the Index.

The arrival of international retailers in recent years including Zara, H&M and Uniqlo has reshaped retail. At the same time, local retailers such as Dick Smith, Payless Shoes and Rhodes & Beckett have disappeared. Retail sales numbers reveal anaemic spending, and the growth of online retail spending continues to gain momentum, even before the Amazon juggernaut hits our shores. It is not surprising that the past year median performance of the retail A-REITs was down 9.5%.

As the past year has shown, the overall performance of the A-REIT Index masks a wide variation in performance across individual A-REIT securities. FY18 is unlikely to be any different given the way the Index is constructed and the likely on-going short-term volatility in A-REIT pricing. Investors who are prepared to avoid using a passive market cap index fund can go hunting for individual A-REIT securities based on merit and attractive pricing. Otherwise, investing with an A-REIT securities fund manager that utilises a high conviction, benchmark (index) unaware investment process, will be well placed to deliver returns well above the headline A-REIT Index in the year ahead.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone (ASX:FLK). This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.